对需求在马尔萨斯积累理论中作用的再思考*

Q3 Social Sciences Contributions to Political Economy Pub Date : 2020-06-16 DOI:10.1093/cpe/bzaa004
Matthew G. Smith
{"title":"对需求在马尔萨斯积累理论中作用的再思考*","authors":"Matthew G. Smith","doi":"10.1093/cpe/bzaa004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper is concerned with the role of effective demand in Malthus’s theory of accumulation expounded in his Principles of Political Economy. As is well known, Keynes praised Malthus for being a forerunner in identifying a lack of effective demand as a cause of depression in economic activity and a constraint on growth. There have since been many interpretations in the literature of Malthus’s position by reference to his arguments against Say’s Law in contending the possibility of “general gluts” and to his theory of capital accumulation. We begin by examining Malthus’s conception of the supply-side factors that determine what we call, “potential accumulation”, being accumulation that is not constrained by demand. The paper then considers the role of effective demand in Malthus’s well known contention of the possibility of “general gluts” and, connectedly, in his theory of demand-constrained capital accumulation. On this basis, we then appraise whether Malthus’s theory anticipates Keynes’s principle of effective demand by reference to the debate on this question in the literature, showing that while Malthus lacked a meaningful saving-investment analysis, he does provide insights important to the modern demand-led approach to growth.","PeriodicalId":38730,"journal":{"name":"Contributions to Political Economy","volume":"39 1","pages":"57-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/cpe/bzaa004","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Reconsideration of the Role of Demand in Malthus’s Theory of Accumulation*\",\"authors\":\"Matthew G. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/cpe/bzaa004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper is concerned with the role of effective demand in Malthus’s theory of accumulation expounded in his Principles of Political Economy. As is well known, Keynes praised Malthus for being a forerunner in identifying a lack of effective demand as a cause of depression in economic activity and a constraint on growth. There have since been many interpretations in the literature of Malthus’s position by reference to his arguments against Say’s Law in contending the possibility of “general gluts” and to his theory of capital accumulation. We begin by examining Malthus’s conception of the supply-side factors that determine what we call, “potential accumulation”, being accumulation that is not constrained by demand. The paper then considers the role of effective demand in Malthus’s well known contention of the possibility of “general gluts” and, connectedly, in his theory of demand-constrained capital accumulation. On this basis, we then appraise whether Malthus’s theory anticipates Keynes’s principle of effective demand by reference to the debate on this question in the literature, showing that while Malthus lacked a meaningful saving-investment analysis, he does provide insights important to the modern demand-led approach to growth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contributions to Political Economy\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"57-76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/cpe/bzaa004\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contributions to Political Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/cpe/bzaa004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contributions to Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cpe/bzaa004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文论述了有效需求在马尔萨斯《政治经济学原理》积累论中的作用。众所周知,凯恩斯称赞马尔萨斯是将缺乏有效需求视为经济活动萧条和增长制约因素的先驱。从那以后,文献中对马尔萨斯的立场有很多解释,比如他反对萨伊定律,反对“普遍过剩”的可能性,以及他的资本积累理论。我们首先考察马尔萨斯关于供给侧因素的概念,这些因素决定了我们所说的“潜在积累”,即不受需求约束的积累。然后,本文考虑了有效需求在马尔萨斯关于“普遍过剩”可能性的著名论点中的作用,以及在他的需求约束资本积累理论中的作用。在此基础上,我们通过参考文献中关于这一问题的辩论,评估了马尔萨斯的理论是否预测了凯恩斯的有效需求原则,表明尽管马尔萨斯缺乏有意义的储蓄投资分析,但他确实为现代需求导向的增长方法提供了重要的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Reconsideration of the Role of Demand in Malthus’s Theory of Accumulation*
This paper is concerned with the role of effective demand in Malthus’s theory of accumulation expounded in his Principles of Political Economy. As is well known, Keynes praised Malthus for being a forerunner in identifying a lack of effective demand as a cause of depression in economic activity and a constraint on growth. There have since been many interpretations in the literature of Malthus’s position by reference to his arguments against Say’s Law in contending the possibility of “general gluts” and to his theory of capital accumulation. We begin by examining Malthus’s conception of the supply-side factors that determine what we call, “potential accumulation”, being accumulation that is not constrained by demand. The paper then considers the role of effective demand in Malthus’s well known contention of the possibility of “general gluts” and, connectedly, in his theory of demand-constrained capital accumulation. On this basis, we then appraise whether Malthus’s theory anticipates Keynes’s principle of effective demand by reference to the debate on this question in the literature, showing that while Malthus lacked a meaningful saving-investment analysis, he does provide insights important to the modern demand-led approach to growth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contributions to Political Economy
Contributions to Political Economy Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Contributions to Political Economy provides a forum for the academic discussion of original ideas and arguments drawn from important critical traditions in economic analysis. Articles fall broadly within the lines of thought associated with the work of the Classical political economists, Marx, Keynes, and Sraffa. While the majority of articles are theoretical and historical in emphasis, the journal welcomes articles of a more applied character. It also reviews noteworthy books recently published.
期刊最新文献
Economics Imperialism then and now: Ben Fine on the Changing Relationship between Economics and the Other Social Sciences Money and Its Body in the Social Positioning and Credit Perspectives: Review Article of Samuel A. Chambers’ Money has No Value The Origins and Dynamics of Inequality: Sex, Politics, and Ideology The Place of Law In Political Economy. J.R.Commons’ Legal Foundations of Capitalism at 100: A Retrospective Article Pasinetti on The Cambridge Keynesians*
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1