通过匈牙利的传统工艺和民间艺术复兴真实性

Q3 Arts and Humanities Acta Ethnographica Hungarica Pub Date : 2022-12-08 DOI:10.1556/022.2021.00039
F. Cseh
{"title":"通过匈牙利的传统工艺和民间艺术复兴真实性","authors":"F. Cseh","doi":"10.1556/022.2021.00039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Folk art and applied folk art have been constantly shaped by cultural and political actors, as well as social and economic processes and the local society affected by them. In the context of these changes, the definitions of authentic, original, and genuine were given a new interpretation, which can be examined in different contexts. The question of authenticity in material folk art arose shortly after the birth of the concept of folk art and the “discovery” of folk art, and has accompanied the history of the revival of material folk art. Nevertheless, although discourses on the subject have been ongoing for a long time in the fields of folklore, theoretical works dealing with material folk art have not paid much attention to the issue of authenticity. The study first describes the contexts through which the issue of authenticity was articulated in artifact production inspired by folk art. The changed social conditions during the 20th century have also generated, and are still generating, new legal dilemmas in the field of artifact production at both community and individual levels, such as the extent to which folk art is individual or community-owned (taking into account the narrower and wider community), and the copyright of an authentic folk artist or craftsman or a creator recognized as a folk artisan. The questions lead to the evolution of the definition of authenticity and point out, among other things, the role that the issue of authenticity plays in the process of the heritagization of folk art.","PeriodicalId":34949,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ethnographica Hungarica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reviving Authenticity through Traditional Crafts and Folk Art in Hungary\",\"authors\":\"F. Cseh\",\"doi\":\"10.1556/022.2021.00039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Folk art and applied folk art have been constantly shaped by cultural and political actors, as well as social and economic processes and the local society affected by them. In the context of these changes, the definitions of authentic, original, and genuine were given a new interpretation, which can be examined in different contexts. The question of authenticity in material folk art arose shortly after the birth of the concept of folk art and the “discovery” of folk art, and has accompanied the history of the revival of material folk art. Nevertheless, although discourses on the subject have been ongoing for a long time in the fields of folklore, theoretical works dealing with material folk art have not paid much attention to the issue of authenticity. The study first describes the contexts through which the issue of authenticity was articulated in artifact production inspired by folk art. The changed social conditions during the 20th century have also generated, and are still generating, new legal dilemmas in the field of artifact production at both community and individual levels, such as the extent to which folk art is individual or community-owned (taking into account the narrower and wider community), and the copyright of an authentic folk artist or craftsman or a creator recognized as a folk artisan. The questions lead to the evolution of the definition of authenticity and point out, among other things, the role that the issue of authenticity plays in the process of the heritagization of folk art.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Ethnographica Hungarica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Ethnographica Hungarica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1556/022.2021.00039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ethnographica Hungarica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/022.2021.00039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

民间艺术和应用民间艺术不断塑造的文化和政治行动者,以及社会和经济进程和当地社会受他们的影响。在这些变化的背景下,真实、原创和真实的定义被赋予了新的解释,可以在不同的背景下进行检验。材料民间艺术的真实性问题在民间艺术概念诞生和民间艺术“被发现”之后不久就出现了,并伴随着材料民间艺术的复兴历史。然而,尽管在民俗学领域关于真实性的论述已经持续了很长一段时间,但关于实物民间艺术的理论作品却没有过多地关注真实性问题。该研究首先描述了受民间艺术启发的工艺品生产中真实性问题的背景。20世纪社会条件的变化,在社区和个人层面上也产生了并仍在产生新的工艺品生产领域的法律困境,例如民间艺术在多大程度上属于个人或社区所有(考虑到更狭窄和更广泛的社区),以及真正的民间艺术家或工匠或被认可为民间工匠的创作者的版权问题。这些问题引出了真实性定义的演变,并指出了真实性问题在民间艺术传承过程中所起的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reviving Authenticity through Traditional Crafts and Folk Art in Hungary
Folk art and applied folk art have been constantly shaped by cultural and political actors, as well as social and economic processes and the local society affected by them. In the context of these changes, the definitions of authentic, original, and genuine were given a new interpretation, which can be examined in different contexts. The question of authenticity in material folk art arose shortly after the birth of the concept of folk art and the “discovery” of folk art, and has accompanied the history of the revival of material folk art. Nevertheless, although discourses on the subject have been ongoing for a long time in the fields of folklore, theoretical works dealing with material folk art have not paid much attention to the issue of authenticity. The study first describes the contexts through which the issue of authenticity was articulated in artifact production inspired by folk art. The changed social conditions during the 20th century have also generated, and are still generating, new legal dilemmas in the field of artifact production at both community and individual levels, such as the extent to which folk art is individual or community-owned (taking into account the narrower and wider community), and the copyright of an authentic folk artist or craftsman or a creator recognized as a folk artisan. The questions lead to the evolution of the definition of authenticity and point out, among other things, the role that the issue of authenticity plays in the process of the heritagization of folk art.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Ethnographica Hungarica
Acta Ethnographica Hungarica Arts and Humanities-Music
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: This journal publishes contributions describing recent scientific advances in the field of ethnography, folklore, and cultural and social anthropology. Emphasis is laid on subjects related to Hungarian ethnography and folklore as well as on works presenting Hungarian folklore in the context of Eastern European and Eurasian cultures. Publishes book reviews and advertisements.
期刊最新文献
The Ornamental Plant Sector and Ornamental Plant Producers During the COVID-19 Pandemic (Cultural Responses to a Pandemic Situation in a Production Setting in East Central Europe) Traditional Food as Cultural Heritage in Hungary The Centralized Management of Folk Art Trade in Hungary Theory and Practice. Ethnographic Approaches to Cultural Heritage and an Empirical Example from Western Ukraine Paládi-Kovács, Attila: Studies in Hungarian Ethnography for a European Ethnology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1