基于HMI/SDO和SOT/Hinode数据的太阳活动区垂直电流概率密度函数的比较

IF 0.9 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Solar-Terrestrial Physics Pub Date : 2022-09-30 DOI:10.12737/stp-83202210
A. Nechaeva, I. Zimovets, I. Sharykin
{"title":"基于HMI/SDO和SOT/Hinode数据的太阳活动区垂直电流概率密度函数的比较","authors":"A. Nechaeva, I. Zimovets, I. Sharykin","doi":"10.12737/stp-83202210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studying electric currents in solar active regions (AR) is an essential step in understanding solar activity in general and solar flares in particular. In this paper, we compare probability density functions of vertical electric current PDF(|jz|) in several active regions, using HMI/SDO and SOT/Hinode photospheric magnetic field data. We have established that at a high value (above the noise level of |jz| ~9•10³ statampere/cm²) of current structures of ARs these functions are nearly identical. The main difference in PDFs for low (noise) jz is due to differences in sensitivity of these two instruments. We have also found that the criterion of pixel selection from magnetic field strength is inapplicable, and the similarity between PDFs is determined by high jz. For all ARs under study we have calculated the power law exponent of the PDF tail for the two instruments, which coincide within their errors for the current structures with current values above noise level. Thus there is no significant difference as to which instrument is used for analyzing probability density functions in high current parts of ARs where flares are localized.","PeriodicalId":43869,"journal":{"name":"Solar-Terrestrial Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between probability density functions of vertical electric current in solar active regions based on HMI/SDO and SOT/Hinode data\",\"authors\":\"A. Nechaeva, I. Zimovets, I. Sharykin\",\"doi\":\"10.12737/stp-83202210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Studying electric currents in solar active regions (AR) is an essential step in understanding solar activity in general and solar flares in particular. In this paper, we compare probability density functions of vertical electric current PDF(|jz|) in several active regions, using HMI/SDO and SOT/Hinode photospheric magnetic field data. We have established that at a high value (above the noise level of |jz| ~9•10³ statampere/cm²) of current structures of ARs these functions are nearly identical. The main difference in PDFs for low (noise) jz is due to differences in sensitivity of these two instruments. We have also found that the criterion of pixel selection from magnetic field strength is inapplicable, and the similarity between PDFs is determined by high jz. For all ARs under study we have calculated the power law exponent of the PDF tail for the two instruments, which coincide within their errors for the current structures with current values above noise level. Thus there is no significant difference as to which instrument is used for analyzing probability density functions in high current parts of ARs where flares are localized.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Solar-Terrestrial Physics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Solar-Terrestrial Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12737/stp-83202210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solar-Terrestrial Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12737/stp-83202210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究太阳活动区(AR)的电流是了解一般太阳活动,特别是太阳耀斑的重要一步。本文利用HMI/SDO和SOT/Hinode光球磁场数据,比较了几个活动区垂直电流PDF(|jz|)的概率密度函数。我们已经确定,在AR的电流结构的高值(高于噪声水平|jz|~9•10³定子安培/cm²)下,这些函数几乎相同。低(噪声)jz的PDF的主要差异是由于这两种仪器的灵敏度不同。我们还发现,根据磁场强度选择像素的标准是不适用的,PDF之间的相似性是由高jz决定的。对于正在研究的所有AR,我们已经计算了两个仪器的PDF尾部的幂律指数,对于电流值高于噪声水平的电流结构,这两个指数在其误差范围内一致。因此,在耀斑局部化的AR的高电流部分中,使用哪种仪器来分析概率密度函数没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison between probability density functions of vertical electric current in solar active regions based on HMI/SDO and SOT/Hinode data
Studying electric currents in solar active regions (AR) is an essential step in understanding solar activity in general and solar flares in particular. In this paper, we compare probability density functions of vertical electric current PDF(|jz|) in several active regions, using HMI/SDO and SOT/Hinode photospheric magnetic field data. We have established that at a high value (above the noise level of |jz| ~9•10³ statampere/cm²) of current structures of ARs these functions are nearly identical. The main difference in PDFs for low (noise) jz is due to differences in sensitivity of these two instruments. We have also found that the criterion of pixel selection from magnetic field strength is inapplicable, and the similarity between PDFs is determined by high jz. For all ARs under study we have calculated the power law exponent of the PDF tail for the two instruments, which coincide within their errors for the current structures with current values above noise level. Thus there is no significant difference as to which instrument is used for analyzing probability density functions in high current parts of ARs where flares are localized.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Solar-Terrestrial Physics
Solar-Terrestrial Physics GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
38
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Design and Development of a Conceptual Solar Energy Laboratory for District Heating Applications Harmonic Stability Assessment of Commercially Available Single-Phase Photovoltaic Inverters Considering Operating-Point Dependencies Simulation of Lead-Free Heterojunction CsGeI2Br/CsGeI3-Based Perovskite Solar Cell Using SCAPS-1D Towards 30% Efficiency by 2030 of Eco-Designed Building Integrated Photovoltaics Global Atlas of Marine Floating Solar PV Potential
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1