顺从行动者的悖论

IF 0.1 3区 文学 N/A LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN OXFORD GERMAN STUDIES Pub Date : 2021-07-03 DOI:10.1080/00787191.2021.1958571
S. E. Jackson
{"title":"顺从行动者的悖论","authors":"S. E. Jackson","doi":"10.1080/00787191.2021.1958571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay reconsiders the apparent paradox in Goethe’s reverence for the actor’s freedom in Wilhelm Meisters Lehrjahre and his demand for actors’ obedience in his ‘Regeln für Schauspieler’. Looking beyond the practical application of the individual ‘Regeln’ and instead reading them collectively as an extension of the Bildungsroman form, it identifies an analogous understanding of the actor as a subject in these works. If Goethe intended the Bildungsroman to educate bourgeois social subjects, in the ‘Regeln’ he sought to educate actors as aesthetic subjects. As much or more than working toward the ‘Verbürgerlichung’ of German theatre and actors, the ‘Regeln’ thus work toward the ‘Ästhetisierung’ of acting and of the actors themselves. Examining the paradox of the obedient actor, the essay shifts perspectives on Goethe’s ‘Regeln für Schauspieler’, and raises questions about how the Bildungsroman and ‘Theaterreform’ related to and impacted modern philosophies of subjecthood and freedom.","PeriodicalId":53844,"journal":{"name":"OXFORD GERMAN STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Paradox of the Obedient Actor\",\"authors\":\"S. E. Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00787191.2021.1958571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay reconsiders the apparent paradox in Goethe’s reverence for the actor’s freedom in Wilhelm Meisters Lehrjahre and his demand for actors’ obedience in his ‘Regeln für Schauspieler’. Looking beyond the practical application of the individual ‘Regeln’ and instead reading them collectively as an extension of the Bildungsroman form, it identifies an analogous understanding of the actor as a subject in these works. If Goethe intended the Bildungsroman to educate bourgeois social subjects, in the ‘Regeln’ he sought to educate actors as aesthetic subjects. As much or more than working toward the ‘Verbürgerlichung’ of German theatre and actors, the ‘Regeln’ thus work toward the ‘Ästhetisierung’ of acting and of the actors themselves. Examining the paradox of the obedient actor, the essay shifts perspectives on Goethe’s ‘Regeln für Schauspieler’, and raises questions about how the Bildungsroman and ‘Theaterreform’ related to and impacted modern philosophies of subjecthood and freedom.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OXFORD GERMAN STUDIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OXFORD GERMAN STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00787191.2021.1958571\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OXFORD GERMAN STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00787191.2021.1958571","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文重新审视了歌德在《威廉·迈斯特·勒哈尔》中对演员自由的崇敬和在《沙夫皮勒》中要求演员服从的明显矛盾。超越个人“Regeln”的实际应用,将其作为成长小说形式的延伸进行集体解读,它确定了对演员作为这些作品中的主体的类似理解。如果说歌德的成长小说旨在教育资产阶级的社会主体,那么在《Regeln》中,他试图将演员教育为审美主体。因此,“Regeln”不仅致力于德国戏剧和演员的“Verbürgerlichung”,还致力于表演和演员本身的“麻醉”。本文考察了顺从行动者的悖论,并对歌德的《沙夫皮勒》进行了视角转换,提出了成长小说和《剧场形式》如何与现代主体和自由哲学联系并影响现代哲学的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Paradox of the Obedient Actor
This essay reconsiders the apparent paradox in Goethe’s reverence for the actor’s freedom in Wilhelm Meisters Lehrjahre and his demand for actors’ obedience in his ‘Regeln für Schauspieler’. Looking beyond the practical application of the individual ‘Regeln’ and instead reading them collectively as an extension of the Bildungsroman form, it identifies an analogous understanding of the actor as a subject in these works. If Goethe intended the Bildungsroman to educate bourgeois social subjects, in the ‘Regeln’ he sought to educate actors as aesthetic subjects. As much or more than working toward the ‘Verbürgerlichung’ of German theatre and actors, the ‘Regeln’ thus work toward the ‘Ästhetisierung’ of acting and of the actors themselves. Examining the paradox of the obedient actor, the essay shifts perspectives on Goethe’s ‘Regeln für Schauspieler’, and raises questions about how the Bildungsroman and ‘Theaterreform’ related to and impacted modern philosophies of subjecthood and freedom.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
OXFORD GERMAN STUDIES
OXFORD GERMAN STUDIES LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: Oxford German Studies is a fully refereed journal, and publishes in English and German, aiming to present contributions from all countries and to represent as wide a range of topics and approaches throughout German studies as can be achieved. The thematic coverage of the journal continues to be based on an inclusive conception of German studies, centred on the study of German literature from the Middle Ages to the present, but extending a warm welcome to interdisciplinary and comparative topics, and to contributions from neighbouring areas such as language study and linguistics, history, philosophy, sociology, music, and art history. The editors are literary scholars, but seek advice from specialists in other areas as appropriate.
期刊最新文献
Fluchtpunkt Florenz – Deutsch-Florentiner in Risorgimento und Gründerzeit Thinking Like a Rat: Grotesque Interspecies Relations, Narrative Hospitality And Posthuman Assemblages in Katherina Hacker’s Die Gäste The Internet is Relational: Networked Connectivity and the ‘Sovereign Individual’ in Videos by Brenda Lien Unrecognizable Subjects, Grief, and Repair in Esther Dischereit’s Blumen Für Otello (2014) Assembly and its Other in German Romantic Literature and Thought: The Inexhaustible Gathering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1