公共图书馆数字媒体使用的建模度量:馆藏和流通Vs.保管后馆藏的访问和许可

IF 0.5 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Technical Services Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI:10.1080/07317131.2023.2226431
Elizabeth L. Keathley, Matthew Frizzell, Fred Rascoe
{"title":"公共图书馆数字媒体使用的建模度量:馆藏和流通Vs.保管后馆藏的访问和许可","authors":"Elizabeth L. Keathley, Matthew Frizzell, Fred Rascoe","doi":"10.1080/07317131.2023.2226431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Public libraries submit the number of holdings and circulation of items in their collections to their state libraries annually, which in turn report these statistics to the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) Public Library Survey (PLS). The reported numbers qualify public libraries for federal and state funding. Additionally, the quantity of holdings (traditionally monographs, serials and physical popular media) is often compared to the circulation (number of check-outs) of those items to calculate a cost-per-circulation number. This calculation becomes complicated when a library’s “holdings” become ephemeral due to the nature of digital media and digital licensing models. This article describes several existing metrics for assessing the holdings and circulation of digital assets within both public and academic libraries and argues for the adoption of post-custodial holding metrics used by archives to better represent items available to library patrons, especially those in traditionally underserved demographics.","PeriodicalId":43138,"journal":{"name":"Technical Services Quarterly","volume":"40 1","pages":"140 - 150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling Metrics of Digital Media Use in Public Libraries: Holdings and Circulation Vs. Access and Licensing in Post-Custodial Collections\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth L. Keathley, Matthew Frizzell, Fred Rascoe\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07317131.2023.2226431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Public libraries submit the number of holdings and circulation of items in their collections to their state libraries annually, which in turn report these statistics to the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) Public Library Survey (PLS). The reported numbers qualify public libraries for federal and state funding. Additionally, the quantity of holdings (traditionally monographs, serials and physical popular media) is often compared to the circulation (number of check-outs) of those items to calculate a cost-per-circulation number. This calculation becomes complicated when a library’s “holdings” become ephemeral due to the nature of digital media and digital licensing models. This article describes several existing metrics for assessing the holdings and circulation of digital assets within both public and academic libraries and argues for the adoption of post-custodial holding metrics used by archives to better represent items available to library patrons, especially those in traditionally underserved demographics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technical Services Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"140 - 150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technical Services Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2023.2226431\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technical Services Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2023.2226431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公共图书馆每年向其州立图书馆提交馆藏和流通数量,州立图书馆反过来将这些统计数据报告给博物馆和图书馆服务研究所(IMLS)公共图书馆调查(PLS)。报告的数字使公共图书馆有资格获得联邦和州的资助。此外,经常将持有的数量(传统上是专著、连载和实体流行媒体)与这些项目的发行量(借阅次数)进行比较,以计算每发行量的成本。由于数字媒体和数字许可模式的性质,当图书馆的“馆藏”变得短暂时,这种计算就变得复杂了。本文描述了用于评估公共和学术图书馆中数字资产的持有和流通的几个现有指标,并主张采用档案使用的保管后持有指标,以更好地代表图书馆用户(特别是那些传统上服务不足的人口统计数据)可获得的项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modeling Metrics of Digital Media Use in Public Libraries: Holdings and Circulation Vs. Access and Licensing in Post-Custodial Collections
ABSTRACT Public libraries submit the number of holdings and circulation of items in their collections to their state libraries annually, which in turn report these statistics to the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) Public Library Survey (PLS). The reported numbers qualify public libraries for federal and state funding. Additionally, the quantity of holdings (traditionally monographs, serials and physical popular media) is often compared to the circulation (number of check-outs) of those items to calculate a cost-per-circulation number. This calculation becomes complicated when a library’s “holdings” become ephemeral due to the nature of digital media and digital licensing models. This article describes several existing metrics for assessing the holdings and circulation of digital assets within both public and academic libraries and argues for the adoption of post-custodial holding metrics used by archives to better represent items available to library patrons, especially those in traditionally underserved demographics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Technical Services Quarterly
Technical Services Quarterly INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Technical Services Quarterly is dedicated to providing a forum for the presentation of current developments and future trends concerning the technical operations of libraries and information centers. The journal aims to keep its readers informed of current developments and future trends in research, developments, and practical implementation of systems and applications of traditional and non-traditional technical services and the public operations they influence and sustain. The journal accepts original research, theoretical, and implementation articles pertaining to technical services, automation, networking, document delivery, information technology, library instruction and information literacy, reference and bibliography, case studies, cost analysis, staffing, etc.
期刊最新文献
Cataloging and Classification - Worcester State University Library AI for Cataloging and Metadata Creation: Perspectives and Future Opportunities from Cataloging and Metadata Professionals Omniglot: The Online Encyclopedia of Writing Systems & Languages The Experimental Library: A Guide to Taking Risks, Failing Forward, and Creating Change Creators in the Academic Library: Collections & Spaces
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1