知识分子已死,知识分子万岁!亚历山大·索尔仁尼琴谈苏联异见和新的精神精英

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, SLAVIC RUSSIAN LITERATURE Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ruslit.2022.03.002
Frances Nethercott
{"title":"知识分子已死,知识分子万岁!亚历山大·索尔仁尼琴谈苏联异见和新的精神精英","authors":"Frances Nethercott","doi":"10.1016/j.ruslit.2022.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article explores the peculiar intermeshing of continuity and discontinuity in Russian culture through the prism of Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s essay, ‘Obrazovanshchina’ (‘The Smatterers’). Written in 1974 for the collective volume <em>Iz-pod glyb</em> (<em>From under the Rubble</em>), Solzhenitsyn drew on arguments advanced by contributors to the famous pre-revolutionary work <em>Vekhi</em> (<em>Landmarks</em>, 1909), both as a polemical tool to distance himself from his immediate contemporary rivals and as a template in his bid to establish a new spiritual elite in Brezhnev’s Soviet Russia. This article suggests that if one intention of Solzhenitsyn’s essay was to declare an irrevocable break with the culture of the pre-revolutionary intelligentsia tradition, the discursive tools he used to do this (intertextual devices, ad hominem polemics, selective historical and ideological narratives) remained firmly anchored within that tradition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43192,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN LITERATURE","volume":"130 ","pages":"Pages 29-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304347922000291/pdfft?md5=6319867b4fee43410b214ced36f6e9a4&pid=1-s2.0-S0304347922000291-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Intelligentsia is Dead, Long Live the Intelligentsia! Alexander Solzhenitsyn on Soviet Dissidence and a New Spiritual Elite\",\"authors\":\"Frances Nethercott\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ruslit.2022.03.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This article explores the peculiar intermeshing of continuity and discontinuity in Russian culture through the prism of Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s essay, ‘Obrazovanshchina’ (‘The Smatterers’). Written in 1974 for the collective volume <em>Iz-pod glyb</em> (<em>From under the Rubble</em>), Solzhenitsyn drew on arguments advanced by contributors to the famous pre-revolutionary work <em>Vekhi</em> (<em>Landmarks</em>, 1909), both as a polemical tool to distance himself from his immediate contemporary rivals and as a template in his bid to establish a new spiritual elite in Brezhnev’s Soviet Russia. This article suggests that if one intention of Solzhenitsyn’s essay was to declare an irrevocable break with the culture of the pre-revolutionary intelligentsia tradition, the discursive tools he used to do this (intertextual devices, ad hominem polemics, selective historical and ideological narratives) remained firmly anchored within that tradition.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RUSSIAN LITERATURE\",\"volume\":\"130 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 29-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304347922000291/pdfft?md5=6319867b4fee43410b214ced36f6e9a4&pid=1-s2.0-S0304347922000291-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RUSSIAN LITERATURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304347922000291\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, SLAVIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUSSIAN LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304347922000291","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, SLAVIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过亚历山大·索尔仁尼琴(Alexander Solzhenitsyn)的文章“Obrazovanshchina”(“the Smatterers”)的棱镜,探讨了俄罗斯文化中连续性和非连续性的独特交织。索尔仁尼琴于1974年为《瓦砾之下》(izi -pod glyb)合集撰写,他借鉴了著名的革命前著作《地标》(地标,1909)的撰稿人提出的观点,既作为一种论战工具,使自己与同时代的直接对手拉开距离,也作为他在勃列日涅夫治下的苏维埃俄罗斯建立新的精神精英的模板。这篇文章表明,如果索尔仁尼琴的文章的意图之一是宣布与革命前知识分子传统文化的不可挽回的决裂,那么他用来做到这一点的话语工具(互文设备,人设辩论,选择性的历史和意识形态叙事)仍然牢固地锚定在传统之中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Intelligentsia is Dead, Long Live the Intelligentsia! Alexander Solzhenitsyn on Soviet Dissidence and a New Spiritual Elite

This article explores the peculiar intermeshing of continuity and discontinuity in Russian culture through the prism of Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s essay, ‘Obrazovanshchina’ (‘The Smatterers’). Written in 1974 for the collective volume Iz-pod glyb (From under the Rubble), Solzhenitsyn drew on arguments advanced by contributors to the famous pre-revolutionary work Vekhi (Landmarks, 1909), both as a polemical tool to distance himself from his immediate contemporary rivals and as a template in his bid to establish a new spiritual elite in Brezhnev’s Soviet Russia. This article suggests that if one intention of Solzhenitsyn’s essay was to declare an irrevocable break with the culture of the pre-revolutionary intelligentsia tradition, the discursive tools he used to do this (intertextual devices, ad hominem polemics, selective historical and ideological narratives) remained firmly anchored within that tradition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
RUSSIAN LITERATURE
RUSSIAN LITERATURE LITERATURE, SLAVIC-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Russian Literature combines issues devoted to special topics of Russian literature with contributions on related subjects in Croatian, Serbian, Czech, Slovak and Polish literatures. Moreover, several issues each year contain articles on heterogeneous subjects concerning Russian Literature. All methods and viewpoints are welcomed, provided they contribute something new, original or challenging to our understanding of Russian and other Slavic literatures. Russian Literature regularly publishes special issues devoted to: • the historical avant-garde in Russian literature and in the other Slavic literatures • the development of descriptive and theoretical poetics in Russian studies and in studies of other Slavic fields.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board В поисках симметрии. Андрей Битов и его последний роман Rebellion Against the Church in the Name of Christ – Nikolai Leskov’s Rebel Priests and Russian Cultural Tradition «Навь и явь» в «Дневнике мыслей» Алексея Ремизова. Январь – февраль 1953 г. Review Article: New Russian Literary History
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1