《拯救英国乡村的妇女》(耶鲁大学出版社,伦敦,2022)

Q1 Arts and Humanities Landscape History Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/01433768.2023.2196138
H. Cook
{"title":"《拯救英国乡村的妇女》(耶鲁大学出版社,伦敦,2022)","authors":"H. Cook","doi":"10.1080/01433768.2023.2196138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"encountered when attempts are made to preserve landscapes. Many orchard landscapes are neither ancient nor traditional: rather they are a product of the significant economic expansion of the Victorian and Edwardian periods, resulting in the ‘orchard century’ defined in the book. Whilst orchards are a part of the historic landscape, they are not a longestablished feature. The book closes with recognition that further research is necessary and acknowledges that this may result in a need to re-write parts of the book. Finally, Barnes and Williamson present some reflective thoughts on the benefits, or otherwise, of the current trends towards re-wilding. The book does contain several typographical errors, for example ‘750 centimetres’ rather than ‘75 centimetres’ (p. 149), and ‘supress’ rather than ‘suppress’ (pp. 29, 44 and 102). There is also a curious reference to the ‘Vale of Pershore’ (p. 35), as opposed to the usual collective term of the ‘Vale of Evesham’ for the fruit-growing parishes of the area: the text also places Evesham and Pershore in Worcestershire on pages 76–7, but in Gloucestershire on page 149. Overall, this is a well-produced book with ample colour illustrations and presents a useful summary on the subject of English orchards, in particular the consideration of the four different types of orchards and a comparison of orchard development between the three key regions of orchard landscapes in England.","PeriodicalId":39639,"journal":{"name":"Landscape History","volume":"44 1","pages":"150 - 151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Women who saved the English Countryside (Yale University Press, London, 2022)\",\"authors\":\"H. Cook\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01433768.2023.2196138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"encountered when attempts are made to preserve landscapes. Many orchard landscapes are neither ancient nor traditional: rather they are a product of the significant economic expansion of the Victorian and Edwardian periods, resulting in the ‘orchard century’ defined in the book. Whilst orchards are a part of the historic landscape, they are not a longestablished feature. The book closes with recognition that further research is necessary and acknowledges that this may result in a need to re-write parts of the book. Finally, Barnes and Williamson present some reflective thoughts on the benefits, or otherwise, of the current trends towards re-wilding. The book does contain several typographical errors, for example ‘750 centimetres’ rather than ‘75 centimetres’ (p. 149), and ‘supress’ rather than ‘suppress’ (pp. 29, 44 and 102). There is also a curious reference to the ‘Vale of Pershore’ (p. 35), as opposed to the usual collective term of the ‘Vale of Evesham’ for the fruit-growing parishes of the area: the text also places Evesham and Pershore in Worcestershire on pages 76–7, but in Gloucestershire on page 149. Overall, this is a well-produced book with ample colour illustrations and presents a useful summary on the subject of English orchards, in particular the consideration of the four different types of orchards and a comparison of orchard development between the three key regions of orchard landscapes in England.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Landscape History\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"150 - 151\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Landscape History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01433768.2023.2196138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01433768.2023.2196138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在试图保护景观时遇到的问题。许多果园景观既不古老也不传统:相反,它们是维多利亚和爱德华时代重大经济扩张的产物,导致了书中定义的“果园世纪”。虽然果园是历史景观的一部分,但它们并不是一个长期存在的特色。本书最后承认有必要进行进一步的研究,并承认这可能导致需要重写本书的部分内容。最后,巴恩斯和威廉姆森对当前重新野生化趋势的好处或其他方面提出了一些反思性的想法。这本书确实包含了一些印刷错误,例如“750厘米”而不是“75厘米”(第149页),以及“压制”而非“压制”(第29、44和102页)。还有一个奇怪的地方提到了“佩肖尔谷”(第35页),而不是该地区水果种植教区通常的“伊夫舍姆谷”:文本还将伍斯特郡的伊夫舍姆和佩肖尔放在第76-7页,但将格洛斯特郡放在第149页。总的来说,这是一本制作精良的书,有大量的彩色插图,对英国果园主题进行了有益的总结,特别是对四种不同类型果园的考虑,以及对英国果园景观三个关键区域之间果园发展的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Women who saved the English Countryside (Yale University Press, London, 2022)
encountered when attempts are made to preserve landscapes. Many orchard landscapes are neither ancient nor traditional: rather they are a product of the significant economic expansion of the Victorian and Edwardian periods, resulting in the ‘orchard century’ defined in the book. Whilst orchards are a part of the historic landscape, they are not a longestablished feature. The book closes with recognition that further research is necessary and acknowledges that this may result in a need to re-write parts of the book. Finally, Barnes and Williamson present some reflective thoughts on the benefits, or otherwise, of the current trends towards re-wilding. The book does contain several typographical errors, for example ‘750 centimetres’ rather than ‘75 centimetres’ (p. 149), and ‘supress’ rather than ‘suppress’ (pp. 29, 44 and 102). There is also a curious reference to the ‘Vale of Pershore’ (p. 35), as opposed to the usual collective term of the ‘Vale of Evesham’ for the fruit-growing parishes of the area: the text also places Evesham and Pershore in Worcestershire on pages 76–7, but in Gloucestershire on page 149. Overall, this is a well-produced book with ample colour illustrations and presents a useful summary on the subject of English orchards, in particular the consideration of the four different types of orchards and a comparison of orchard development between the three key regions of orchard landscapes in England.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Landscape History
Landscape History Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Roman to early medieval cereal farming in the Rhineland: weeds, tillage, and the spread of the mouldboard plough. Landscapes of the Norman Conquest (Pen & Sword Archaeology, Barnsley, 2022) Environments of Identity. Agricultural community, work and concepts of local in Yorkshire, 1918–2018 (The White Horse Press, Winwick, 2022) Landscape Research The Doctor’s Garden: medicine, science, and horticulture in Britain (Yale University Press, London, 2022)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1