18世纪德国和英国的作家经济学

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN Publications of the English Goethe Society Pub Date : 2017-09-02 DOI:10.1080/09593683.2017.1368923
M. Bell
{"title":"18世纪德国和英国的作家经济学","authors":"M. Bell","doi":"10.1080/09593683.2017.1368923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The relative backwardness of eighteenth-century German literature and the presumed ambivalence of German writers towards political power have traditionally been explained by the lack of a copyright law in Germany, which meant that German writers, in contrast to their British contemporaries, were often financially dependent on the state. This paper argues that the differences between British and German writers in economic terms have been overstated. British copyright law did not in fact serve the interests of writers to the extent that has traditionally been supposed. In Germany and Britain the situation of writers was determined more by the underlying economics of the publishing trade, especially the high cost of book production, which enabled publishers to pursue monopolistic practices and tilted the tables in favour of publishers and against writers. This argument has further implications for our understanding of the politics of German literature in the late eighteenth century.","PeriodicalId":40789,"journal":{"name":"Publications of the English Goethe Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09593683.2017.1368923","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Economics of Authorship in Eighteenth-Century Germany and Britain\",\"authors\":\"M. Bell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09593683.2017.1368923\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The relative backwardness of eighteenth-century German literature and the presumed ambivalence of German writers towards political power have traditionally been explained by the lack of a copyright law in Germany, which meant that German writers, in contrast to their British contemporaries, were often financially dependent on the state. This paper argues that the differences between British and German writers in economic terms have been overstated. British copyright law did not in fact serve the interests of writers to the extent that has traditionally been supposed. In Germany and Britain the situation of writers was determined more by the underlying economics of the publishing trade, especially the high cost of book production, which enabled publishers to pursue monopolistic practices and tilted the tables in favour of publishers and against writers. This argument has further implications for our understanding of the politics of German literature in the late eighteenth century.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Publications of the English Goethe Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09593683.2017.1368923\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Publications of the English Goethe Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593683.2017.1368923\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Publications of the English Goethe Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593683.2017.1368923","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

18世纪德国文学的相对落后和德国作家对政治权力的矛盾心理,传统上被解释为德国缺乏版权法,这意味着德国作家,与他们的英国同时代人相比,往往在经济上依赖于国家。本文认为,英国和德国作家在经济学方面的差异被夸大了。事实上,英国版权法并没有像传统上认为的那样为作家的利益服务。在德国和英国,作家的处境更多地是由出版业的基本经济状况决定的,尤其是图书生产的高成本,这使得出版商能够追求垄断行为,使天平向有利于出版商而不利于作家的方向倾斜。这一论点对我们理解18世纪晚期德国文学的政治有进一步的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Economics of Authorship in Eighteenth-Century Germany and Britain
Abstract The relative backwardness of eighteenth-century German literature and the presumed ambivalence of German writers towards political power have traditionally been explained by the lack of a copyright law in Germany, which meant that German writers, in contrast to their British contemporaries, were often financially dependent on the state. This paper argues that the differences between British and German writers in economic terms have been overstated. British copyright law did not in fact serve the interests of writers to the extent that has traditionally been supposed. In Germany and Britain the situation of writers was determined more by the underlying economics of the publishing trade, especially the high cost of book production, which enabled publishers to pursue monopolistic practices and tilted the tables in favour of publishers and against writers. This argument has further implications for our understanding of the politics of German literature in the late eighteenth century.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Publications of the English Goethe Society
Publications of the English Goethe Society LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
The Battle of the Statues in Berlin, 1859–71: Reflections on the Public Image and Standing of the German Classical Authors The Whirlwind of the Biosphere: On Vernadsky’s Goethean Cosmos – An Introduction to Vernadsky’s Goethe Essay Vladimir Vernadsky’s ‘Thoughts and Observations on Goethe as a Naturalist’: Its Prehistory and Reception Thoughts and Observations on Goethe as a Naturalist* ‘Gestaltenlehre ist Verwandlungslehre’: Zur ‘genetischen Methode’ als einem interdisziplinären Schlüsselkonzept Goethes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1