印尼版新的简短工作压力问卷(简短版)用于办公室工作人员工作压力筛查的有效性和可靠性

IF 0.5 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medical Journal of Indonesia Pub Date : 2022-11-02 DOI:10.13181/mji.oa.226316
N. P. Adi, Ansgar Azurit Virenti Paska Da Lopez, H. Diatri, R. A. Werdhani, D. Soemarko, D. Fitriani
{"title":"印尼版新的简短工作压力问卷(简短版)用于办公室工作人员工作压力筛查的有效性和可靠性","authors":"N. P. Adi, Ansgar Azurit Virenti Paska Da Lopez, H. Diatri, R. A. Werdhani, D. Soemarko, D. Fitriani","doi":"10.13181/mji.oa.226316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND The short version of the new brief job stress questionnaire (SV-NBJSQ) that is originally in Japanese could evaluate work-related stress in Indonesian office workers. However, it has not been validated in Indonesian. Thus, this study aimed to test the validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of the SV-NBJSQ. \nMETHODS This study was conducted by linguistic and cultural adaptation of the original Japanese questionnaire into Indonesian and continued with exploratory factor analysis, internal consistency, and reliability test of Cronbach’s alpha. Electronic and paper-based data were collected using total sampling from office workers at two companies in Jakarta from December 2017 to August 2018. \nRESULTS A total of 438 respondents filled the questionnaire. The final version of the questionnaire consisted of 63 items, screened based on a loading factor of >0.4 and 13 factors (dimensions). Each factor had a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.628–0.887, while the entire 63 had 0.904 with a total documented cumulative variation of 64.97%. \nCONCLUSIONS The Indonesian version of the SV-NBJSQ is valid and reliable. Thus, we may use it as a more suitable, updated, and comprehensive tool to evaluate work-related stress among office workers.","PeriodicalId":18302,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Indonesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of the new brief job stress questionnaire (short version) for work-related stress screening among office workers\",\"authors\":\"N. P. Adi, Ansgar Azurit Virenti Paska Da Lopez, H. Diatri, R. A. Werdhani, D. Soemarko, D. Fitriani\",\"doi\":\"10.13181/mji.oa.226316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND The short version of the new brief job stress questionnaire (SV-NBJSQ) that is originally in Japanese could evaluate work-related stress in Indonesian office workers. However, it has not been validated in Indonesian. Thus, this study aimed to test the validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of the SV-NBJSQ. \\nMETHODS This study was conducted by linguistic and cultural adaptation of the original Japanese questionnaire into Indonesian and continued with exploratory factor analysis, internal consistency, and reliability test of Cronbach’s alpha. Electronic and paper-based data were collected using total sampling from office workers at two companies in Jakarta from December 2017 to August 2018. \\nRESULTS A total of 438 respondents filled the questionnaire. The final version of the questionnaire consisted of 63 items, screened based on a loading factor of >0.4 and 13 factors (dimensions). Each factor had a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.628–0.887, while the entire 63 had 0.904 with a total documented cumulative variation of 64.97%. \\nCONCLUSIONS The Indonesian version of the SV-NBJSQ is valid and reliable. Thus, we may use it as a more suitable, updated, and comprehensive tool to evaluate work-related stress among office workers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Journal of Indonesia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Journal of Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13181/mji.oa.226316\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13181/mji.oa.226316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新工作压力简要问卷(SV-NBJSQ)的简短版本最初是日语,可以评估印尼上班族的工作压力。然而,它尚未在印尼语中得到验证。因此,本研究旨在检验印尼语版SV-NBJSQ的效度和信度。方法将原日语问卷翻译成印尼语进行语言和文化调整,并进行探索性因子分析、内部一致性和Cronbach 's alpha信度检验。从2017年12月至2018年8月,通过对雅加达两家公司的办公室工作人员进行总抽样,收集了电子和纸质数据。结果共438名被调查者填写了问卷。最终版本的问卷包括63个项目,根据负载因子b>.4和13个因素(维度)筛选。各因子的Cronbach 's alpha为0.628 ~ 0.887,63个因子的Cronbach 's alpha为0.904,总累积变异为64.97%。结论印尼语版SV-NBJSQ有效可靠。因此,我们可以用它作为一个更合适的、更新的、全面的工具来评估办公室工作人员的工作压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of the new brief job stress questionnaire (short version) for work-related stress screening among office workers
BACKGROUND The short version of the new brief job stress questionnaire (SV-NBJSQ) that is originally in Japanese could evaluate work-related stress in Indonesian office workers. However, it has not been validated in Indonesian. Thus, this study aimed to test the validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of the SV-NBJSQ. METHODS This study was conducted by linguistic and cultural adaptation of the original Japanese questionnaire into Indonesian and continued with exploratory factor analysis, internal consistency, and reliability test of Cronbach’s alpha. Electronic and paper-based data were collected using total sampling from office workers at two companies in Jakarta from December 2017 to August 2018. RESULTS A total of 438 respondents filled the questionnaire. The final version of the questionnaire consisted of 63 items, screened based on a loading factor of >0.4 and 13 factors (dimensions). Each factor had a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.628–0.887, while the entire 63 had 0.904 with a total documented cumulative variation of 64.97%. CONCLUSIONS The Indonesian version of the SV-NBJSQ is valid and reliable. Thus, we may use it as a more suitable, updated, and comprehensive tool to evaluate work-related stress among office workers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Indonesia
Medical Journal of Indonesia MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Journal of Indonesia is a peer-reviewed and open access journal that focuses on promoting medical sciences generated from basic sciences, clinical, and community or public health research to integrate researches in all aspects of human health. This journal publishes original articles, reviews, and also interesting case reports. Brief communications containing short features of medicine, latest developments in diagnostic procedures, treatment, or other health issues that is important for the development of health care system are also acceptable. Letters and commentaries of our published articles are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Transition of DNA-HPV over time in HPV-infected women: a 7-year cohort study Changes in body weight and healthy lifestyle perception of Indonesian adults during COVID-19 pandemic Maternal IgG in hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn-ABO incompatibility Incidence of urethral stricture in patients with urethral trauma: a 10-year experience in an Indonesian tertiary hospital How artificial intelligence chatbots becomes author’s true friend in medical writing without risking ethical violations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1