拜占庭四至三世纪的爱国主义思想与环境

Q4 Arts and Humanities Byzantin Symmeikta Pub Date : 2021-03-03 DOI:10.12681/BYZSYM.25339
Filip Ivanovic
{"title":"拜占庭四至三世纪的爱国主义思想与环境","authors":"Filip Ivanovic","doi":"10.12681/BYZSYM.25339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article situates itself within the debate on ecological issues by emphasizing the importance of philosophical and theological approach to the questions at stake, and focusing on the contributions of Byzantine thought, which has been rather neglected in this context. With this in mind, the article offers a panoramic view of several Byzantine authors’ ideas on the environment and the relationship between human beings and the rest of the creation. By examining the thought of Maximus the Confessor, Dionysius the Areopagite, John Damascene, and John Chrysostom the author highlights their views on deification, unity of creation, and environmental/animal ethics in order to conclude that the mainstream Byzantine vision of nature was not its exploitation, but affirmation of the created world and crucial responsibility of human beings in it.","PeriodicalId":38484,"journal":{"name":"Byzantin Symmeikta","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Il pensiero patristico bizantino dei secoli IV-VIII e l'ambiente\",\"authors\":\"Filip Ivanovic\",\"doi\":\"10.12681/BYZSYM.25339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article situates itself within the debate on ecological issues by emphasizing the importance of philosophical and theological approach to the questions at stake, and focusing on the contributions of Byzantine thought, which has been rather neglected in this context. With this in mind, the article offers a panoramic view of several Byzantine authors’ ideas on the environment and the relationship between human beings and the rest of the creation. By examining the thought of Maximus the Confessor, Dionysius the Areopagite, John Damascene, and John Chrysostom the author highlights their views on deification, unity of creation, and environmental/animal ethics in order to conclude that the mainstream Byzantine vision of nature was not its exploitation, but affirmation of the created world and crucial responsibility of human beings in it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Byzantin Symmeikta\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Byzantin Symmeikta\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12681/BYZSYM.25339\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Byzantin Symmeikta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12681/BYZSYM.25339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过强调哲学和神学方法对利害攸关的问题的重要性,将自己置于关于生态问题的辩论中,并关注拜占庭思想的贡献,这在这一背景下被相当忽视。考虑到这一点,本文提供了几个拜占庭作家关于环境和人类与其他创造物之间关系的观点的全景视图。通过考察忏忏者马克西姆斯、战神狄奥尼修斯、约翰·大马士革和约翰·克里索斯托姆的思想,作者强调了他们对神化、创造的统一和环境/动物伦理的观点,从而得出结论,拜占庭的主流自然观不是对自然的剥削,而是对被创造的世界和人类在其中的关键责任的肯定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Il pensiero patristico bizantino dei secoli IV-VIII e l'ambiente
The article situates itself within the debate on ecological issues by emphasizing the importance of philosophical and theological approach to the questions at stake, and focusing on the contributions of Byzantine thought, which has been rather neglected in this context. With this in mind, the article offers a panoramic view of several Byzantine authors’ ideas on the environment and the relationship between human beings and the rest of the creation. By examining the thought of Maximus the Confessor, Dionysius the Areopagite, John Damascene, and John Chrysostom the author highlights their views on deification, unity of creation, and environmental/animal ethics in order to conclude that the mainstream Byzantine vision of nature was not its exploitation, but affirmation of the created world and crucial responsibility of human beings in it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Byzantin Symmeikta
Byzantin Symmeikta Arts and Humanities-Classics
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Βιβλιογραφικό σημείωμα: Storytelling in Byzantium : narratological approaches to Byzantine texts and images / edited by Charis Messis, Margaret Mullett & Ingela Nilsson, Uppsala 2018, σελ. X+320. ISBN 978-91-513-0362-8 Βιβλιογραφικό σημείωμα: Γ. Διαμαντόπουλος, Το δίκαιο της μνηστείας και του γάμου στα Βασιλικά. Νομοκανονική θεώρηση, Αθήνα 2013 Βιβλιογραφικό σημείωμα: The Reception of Byzantium in European culture since 1500, edited by P. MARCINIAK and D. C. SMYTHE, London and New York 2016 (first issued in paperback 2019) Βιβλιογραφικό σημείωμα: Δ. Μ. ΓΟΝΗΣ - ΠΑΤΑΠΙΟΣ ΜΟΝΑΧΟΣ ΚΑΥΣΟΚΑΛΥΒΙΤΗΣ, Παπα-Ἰωνᾶ Καυσοκαλυβίτου (†1765). Νεομαρτυρολογικὴ Συλλογὴ (Εἰσαγωγή-Κριτικὴ ἔκδοση τοῦ κειμένου), Θεσσαλονίκη 2020, σελ. 450. ISBN 978-960-656-016-3 Βιβλιοκρισία:Constantin VII Porphyrogénète, Le Livre des Cérémonies, sous la direction de G. Dagron (+) et B. Flusin; t. I-V, Paris 2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1