{"title":"残疾学生150年教育:取得的进展和仍然存在的挑战。客座编辑","authors":"Karen de Bruin","doi":"10.1177/00049441221131875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"and Saggers in the third article. This article presents an examination of what drives and what hinders the transformation to a single inclusive system in Queensland, the Australian jurisdiction with the most progressive policy for inclusive education in Australia. The following two articles, both by Elizabeth Dickson, examine the legal barriers to inclusive education for school students with disability. The fourth article considers the shortcomings of the DDA itself, while the fi fth article examines the adversarial nature of the legal system within which it functions. The sixth article by Tanya Serry, Pamela Snow, Lorraine Hammond, Emina McLean and Jane McCormack considers the preparation for teachers to work in inclusive classrooms through the example of reading in-struction. Their fi ndings highlight lingering attitudinal barriers within the teaching workforce, and those who prepare them, as many teachers expressed low con fi dence in their capability to support students experiencing reading dif fi culties, low expectations of those students ’ capacity to learn and make progress, and a view that the learning of students with disability is the responsibility of specialists beyond the general education classroom. The seventh and fi nal article by Tim Pitman and Matthew Brett considers how inclusion and disability are themselves conceptualised and traces the trajectory of conceptual models over the past 150 years through the example of higher education policy. The authors conclude by noting the lingering traces of historical thinking such as charity and welfarism within contemporary policy and argue for a new model, grounded in what they term (A)ccessibility, that would genuinely support the agency and educational aspirations of students with disability.","PeriodicalId":46741,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Education","volume":"66 1","pages":"215 - 217"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"150 years of Education for Students with Disability: Progress Made and Remaining Challenges. Guest Editorial\",\"authors\":\"Karen de Bruin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00049441221131875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"and Saggers in the third article. This article presents an examination of what drives and what hinders the transformation to a single inclusive system in Queensland, the Australian jurisdiction with the most progressive policy for inclusive education in Australia. The following two articles, both by Elizabeth Dickson, examine the legal barriers to inclusive education for school students with disability. The fourth article considers the shortcomings of the DDA itself, while the fi fth article examines the adversarial nature of the legal system within which it functions. The sixth article by Tanya Serry, Pamela Snow, Lorraine Hammond, Emina McLean and Jane McCormack considers the preparation for teachers to work in inclusive classrooms through the example of reading in-struction. Their fi ndings highlight lingering attitudinal barriers within the teaching workforce, and those who prepare them, as many teachers expressed low con fi dence in their capability to support students experiencing reading dif fi culties, low expectations of those students ’ capacity to learn and make progress, and a view that the learning of students with disability is the responsibility of specialists beyond the general education classroom. The seventh and fi nal article by Tim Pitman and Matthew Brett considers how inclusion and disability are themselves conceptualised and traces the trajectory of conceptual models over the past 150 years through the example of higher education policy. The authors conclude by noting the lingering traces of historical thinking such as charity and welfarism within contemporary policy and argue for a new model, grounded in what they term (A)ccessibility, that would genuinely support the agency and educational aspirations of students with disability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Education\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"215 - 217\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00049441221131875\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00049441221131875","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
150 years of Education for Students with Disability: Progress Made and Remaining Challenges. Guest Editorial
and Saggers in the third article. This article presents an examination of what drives and what hinders the transformation to a single inclusive system in Queensland, the Australian jurisdiction with the most progressive policy for inclusive education in Australia. The following two articles, both by Elizabeth Dickson, examine the legal barriers to inclusive education for school students with disability. The fourth article considers the shortcomings of the DDA itself, while the fi fth article examines the adversarial nature of the legal system within which it functions. The sixth article by Tanya Serry, Pamela Snow, Lorraine Hammond, Emina McLean and Jane McCormack considers the preparation for teachers to work in inclusive classrooms through the example of reading in-struction. Their fi ndings highlight lingering attitudinal barriers within the teaching workforce, and those who prepare them, as many teachers expressed low con fi dence in their capability to support students experiencing reading dif fi culties, low expectations of those students ’ capacity to learn and make progress, and a view that the learning of students with disability is the responsibility of specialists beyond the general education classroom. The seventh and fi nal article by Tim Pitman and Matthew Brett considers how inclusion and disability are themselves conceptualised and traces the trajectory of conceptual models over the past 150 years through the example of higher education policy. The authors conclude by noting the lingering traces of historical thinking such as charity and welfarism within contemporary policy and argue for a new model, grounded in what they term (A)ccessibility, that would genuinely support the agency and educational aspirations of students with disability.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Journal of Education was established in 1957 under the editorship of Professor Bill Connell. Drawing upon research conducted in Australia and internationally, the AJE aims to inform educational researchers as well as educators, administrators and policymakers about issues of contemporary concern in education. The AJE seeks to publish research studies that contribute to educational knowledge and research methodologies, and that review findings of research studies. Its scope embraces all fields of education and training. In addition to publishing research studies about education it also publishes articles that address education in relation to other fields.