{"title":"欧洲中生代现存寄生甲壳类动物的化石亲缘关系","authors":"M. Schädel, C. Nagler, M. Hyžný","doi":"10.18268/bsgm2023v75n2a220323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The fossil record of Isopoda includes remains of presumed parasites. Among the fossils which have been discussed as potential parasites are those termed as Urda Münster, 1840. Some of these fossils have been discussed as possibly related to an extant group of parasites, Gnathiidae Leach, 1814. The type species of Urda – Urda rostrata Münster, 1840 – is herein interpreted as a close relative of the group Gnathiidae, based on the shared occurrence of a number of apomorphic features. This is with Urda punctata (Münster, 1842) herein being interpreted as a junior subjective synonym of U. rostrata. However, not all of the fossils associated with the name Urda can safely be identified as close relatives of Gnathiidae. Moreover, it is unclear whether the extinct species, which can be identified as close relatives of U. rostrata and Gnathiidae form a monophyletic group, as we could not identify an autapomorphy for a natural group Urda. A new species of close relatives of Urda rostrata and Gnathiidae – Urda buechneri n. sp. – is formally described based on µCT image data. Palaega suevica Reiff, 1936 and Palaega kessleri Reiff, 1936 are found to be subjective synonyms and are re-interpreted as Urda suevica n. comb. – a species closely related to U. rostrata. Due to the documented destruction of the holotype, a herein figured fossil specimen is designated as the neotype of Urda suevica. Palaega? stemmerbergensis Malzahn, 1968 is also interpreted as a close representative of U. rostrata and herein treated as Urda stemmerbergensis n. comb. Another already formally described species – Eobooralana rhodanica gen. et comb. nov. – is interpreted as a more distant relative, which is likely to be closer related to other extant species of Isopoda than those within Gnathiidae. For three species there are not enough characters preserved to interpret them as closely related to U. rostrata and Gnathiidae: Urda? liasica Frentzen, 1937 nom. dub. (type material destroyed, description insufficient for proper diagnosis), Urda? moravica Remeš, 1912 and Urda? zelandica Buckeridge and Johns, 1996.","PeriodicalId":48849,"journal":{"name":"Boletin De La Sociedad Geologica Mexicana","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fossil relatives of extant parasitic crustaceans from the Mesozoic of Europe\",\"authors\":\"M. Schädel, C. Nagler, M. Hyžný\",\"doi\":\"10.18268/bsgm2023v75n2a220323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The fossil record of Isopoda includes remains of presumed parasites. Among the fossils which have been discussed as potential parasites are those termed as Urda Münster, 1840. Some of these fossils have been discussed as possibly related to an extant group of parasites, Gnathiidae Leach, 1814. The type species of Urda – Urda rostrata Münster, 1840 – is herein interpreted as a close relative of the group Gnathiidae, based on the shared occurrence of a number of apomorphic features. This is with Urda punctata (Münster, 1842) herein being interpreted as a junior subjective synonym of U. rostrata. However, not all of the fossils associated with the name Urda can safely be identified as close relatives of Gnathiidae. Moreover, it is unclear whether the extinct species, which can be identified as close relatives of U. rostrata and Gnathiidae form a monophyletic group, as we could not identify an autapomorphy for a natural group Urda. A new species of close relatives of Urda rostrata and Gnathiidae – Urda buechneri n. sp. – is formally described based on µCT image data. Palaega suevica Reiff, 1936 and Palaega kessleri Reiff, 1936 are found to be subjective synonyms and are re-interpreted as Urda suevica n. comb. – a species closely related to U. rostrata. Due to the documented destruction of the holotype, a herein figured fossil specimen is designated as the neotype of Urda suevica. Palaega? stemmerbergensis Malzahn, 1968 is also interpreted as a close representative of U. rostrata and herein treated as Urda stemmerbergensis n. comb. Another already formally described species – Eobooralana rhodanica gen. et comb. nov. – is interpreted as a more distant relative, which is likely to be closer related to other extant species of Isopoda than those within Gnathiidae. For three species there are not enough characters preserved to interpret them as closely related to U. rostrata and Gnathiidae: Urda? liasica Frentzen, 1937 nom. dub. (type material destroyed, description insufficient for proper diagnosis), Urda? moravica Remeš, 1912 and Urda? zelandica Buckeridge and Johns, 1996.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Boletin De La Sociedad Geologica Mexicana\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Boletin De La Sociedad Geologica Mexicana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18268/bsgm2023v75n2a220323\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boletin De La Sociedad Geologica Mexicana","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18268/bsgm2023v75n2a220323","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fossil relatives of extant parasitic crustaceans from the Mesozoic of Europe
The fossil record of Isopoda includes remains of presumed parasites. Among the fossils which have been discussed as potential parasites are those termed as Urda Münster, 1840. Some of these fossils have been discussed as possibly related to an extant group of parasites, Gnathiidae Leach, 1814. The type species of Urda – Urda rostrata Münster, 1840 – is herein interpreted as a close relative of the group Gnathiidae, based on the shared occurrence of a number of apomorphic features. This is with Urda punctata (Münster, 1842) herein being interpreted as a junior subjective synonym of U. rostrata. However, not all of the fossils associated with the name Urda can safely be identified as close relatives of Gnathiidae. Moreover, it is unclear whether the extinct species, which can be identified as close relatives of U. rostrata and Gnathiidae form a monophyletic group, as we could not identify an autapomorphy for a natural group Urda. A new species of close relatives of Urda rostrata and Gnathiidae – Urda buechneri n. sp. – is formally described based on µCT image data. Palaega suevica Reiff, 1936 and Palaega kessleri Reiff, 1936 are found to be subjective synonyms and are re-interpreted as Urda suevica n. comb. – a species closely related to U. rostrata. Due to the documented destruction of the holotype, a herein figured fossil specimen is designated as the neotype of Urda suevica. Palaega? stemmerbergensis Malzahn, 1968 is also interpreted as a close representative of U. rostrata and herein treated as Urda stemmerbergensis n. comb. Another already formally described species – Eobooralana rhodanica gen. et comb. nov. – is interpreted as a more distant relative, which is likely to be closer related to other extant species of Isopoda than those within Gnathiidae. For three species there are not enough characters preserved to interpret them as closely related to U. rostrata and Gnathiidae: Urda? liasica Frentzen, 1937 nom. dub. (type material destroyed, description insufficient for proper diagnosis), Urda? moravica Remeš, 1912 and Urda? zelandica Buckeridge and Johns, 1996.
期刊介绍:
The Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica Mexicana is a completely free-access electronic journal published semi-annually that publishes papers and technical notes with its main objective to contribute to an understanding of the geology of Mexico, of its neighbor areas, and of geologically similar areas anywhere on Earth’s crust. Geology has no boundaries so we may publish papers on any area of knowledge that is interesting to our readers.
We also favor the publication of papers on relatively unfamiliar subjects and objectives in mainstream journals, e.g., papers devoted to new methodologies or their improvement, and areas of knowledge that in the past had relatively little attention paid them in Mexican journals, such as urban geology, water management, environmental geology, and ore deposits, among others. Mexico is a land of volcanos, earthquakes, vast resources in minerals and petroleum, and a shortage of water. Consequently, these topics should certainly be of major interest to our readers, our Society, and society in general. Furthermore, the Boletín has been published since 1904; that makes it one of the oldest scientific journals currently active in Mexico and, most notably, its entire contents, from the first issue on, are available online.