将“尸体”的社会地位扩展到严重昏迷:亨利·比彻与哈佛脑死亡委员会

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Perspectives in Biology and Medicine Pub Date : 2022-03-17 DOI:10.1353/pbm.2022.0002
Michael Nair-Collins
{"title":"将“尸体”的社会地位扩展到严重昏迷:亨利·比彻与哈佛脑死亡委员会","authors":"Michael Nair-Collins","doi":"10.1353/pbm.2022.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This essay examines the development of the seminal report, “A Definition of Irreversible Coma,” by the Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death in 1968. Detailed examination of original documents archived in the Henry K. Beecher Papers at Harvard’s Countway Library reveals a variety of concerns and values at play in the development of the report, along with disagreement on a few key points among Committee members. One important goal of the Committee was to render treatment removal from patients in severe coma mandatory—not merely permissible—and without need for permission or consultation with the patient’s family. Protecting and supporting organ transplantation also played a significant role in the Committee’s writings and deliberations. Multiple concepts of death and justifications for brain death can be found, most of them inconsistent with each other and offered without a clear rationale. The essay emphasizes what is perhaps the most important aspect of this period in history: this is the moment when, without clear physiologic justification, the social and legal status of “corpse” became compulsorily applied to living human bodies.","PeriodicalId":54627,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Biology and Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expanding the Social Status of “Corpse” to the Severely Comatose: Henry Beecher and the Harvard Brain Death Committee\",\"authors\":\"Michael Nair-Collins\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/pbm.2022.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This essay examines the development of the seminal report, “A Definition of Irreversible Coma,” by the Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death in 1968. Detailed examination of original documents archived in the Henry K. Beecher Papers at Harvard’s Countway Library reveals a variety of concerns and values at play in the development of the report, along with disagreement on a few key points among Committee members. One important goal of the Committee was to render treatment removal from patients in severe coma mandatory—not merely permissible—and without need for permission or consultation with the patient’s family. Protecting and supporting organ transplantation also played a significant role in the Committee’s writings and deliberations. Multiple concepts of death and justifications for brain death can be found, most of them inconsistent with each other and offered without a clear rationale. The essay emphasizes what is perhaps the most important aspect of this period in history: this is the moment when, without clear physiologic justification, the social and legal status of “corpse” became compulsorily applied to living human bodies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives in Biology and Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives in Biology and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2022.0002\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2022.0002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:本文考察了1968年哈佛医学院脑死亡定义审查特设委员会的开创性报告《不可逆昏迷的定义》的发展。对哈佛大学Countway图书馆亨利·K·比彻论文中存档的原始文件的详细审查揭示了该报告发展过程中的各种担忧和价值观,以及委员会成员在几个关键点上的分歧。该委员会的一个重要目标是强制要求——而不仅仅是允许——取消对严重昏迷患者的治疗,并且无需征得患者家属的许可或咨询。保护和支持器官移植在委员会的著作和审议中也发挥了重要作用。死亡的概念和脑死亡的理由多种多样,其中大多数相互矛盾,而且没有明确的理由。这篇文章强调了这一时期历史上最重要的方面:在没有明确生理理由的情况下,“尸体”的社会和法律地位被强制适用于活体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Expanding the Social Status of “Corpse” to the Severely Comatose: Henry Beecher and the Harvard Brain Death Committee
Abstract:This essay examines the development of the seminal report, “A Definition of Irreversible Coma,” by the Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death in 1968. Detailed examination of original documents archived in the Henry K. Beecher Papers at Harvard’s Countway Library reveals a variety of concerns and values at play in the development of the report, along with disagreement on a few key points among Committee members. One important goal of the Committee was to render treatment removal from patients in severe coma mandatory—not merely permissible—and without need for permission or consultation with the patient’s family. Protecting and supporting organ transplantation also played a significant role in the Committee’s writings and deliberations. Multiple concepts of death and justifications for brain death can be found, most of them inconsistent with each other and offered without a clear rationale. The essay emphasizes what is perhaps the most important aspect of this period in history: this is the moment when, without clear physiologic justification, the social and legal status of “corpse” became compulsorily applied to living human bodies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectives in Biology and Medicine
Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 医学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, an interdisciplinary scholarly journal whose readers include biologists, physicians, students, and scholars, publishes essays that place important biological or medical subjects in broader scientific, social, or humanistic contexts. These essays span a wide range of subjects, from biomedical topics such as neurobiology, genetics, and evolution, to topics in ethics, history, philosophy, and medical education and practice. The editors encourage an informal style that has literary merit and that preserves the warmth, excitement, and color of the biological and medical sciences.
期刊最新文献
Organismal Superposition and Death "Inherently Limited by Our Imaginations": Health Anxieties, Politics, and the History of the Climate Crisis Diagnosis: What Is the Structure of Its Reasoning? Valuing the Acute Subjective Experience Lived Religion in Religious Vaccine Exemptions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1