论坛:挑战学生跨越意识形态差异进行有意义的交流

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Transformative Education Pub Date : 2021-12-06 DOI:10.1177/15413446211062375
Laura M. Harrison, Helen Williams-Cumberbatch
{"title":"论坛:挑战学生跨越意识形态差异进行有意义的交流","authors":"Laura M. Harrison, Helen Williams-Cumberbatch","doi":"10.1177/15413446211062375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As college student educators, we notice a pattern of difficulty in our students’ ability to engage meaningfully across ideological differences. In this work, we posit the social media mindset’s penchant for reductive framing and outgroup shaming as a potential diagnosis of the problem. We explore how these tendencies show up in the classroom; we present alternative frameworks for stimulating better conversations across differences. These frameworks include promoting democratic civility (as opposed to niceness), understanding ourselves as works in progress (as opposed to engaging call-out and cancel culture), and creating the conditions for the call-in (as opposed to “ducking diversity”).","PeriodicalId":51740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transformative Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forum: Challenging Students to Engage Meaningfully Across Ideological Differences\",\"authors\":\"Laura M. Harrison, Helen Williams-Cumberbatch\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15413446211062375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As college student educators, we notice a pattern of difficulty in our students’ ability to engage meaningfully across ideological differences. In this work, we posit the social media mindset’s penchant for reductive framing and outgroup shaming as a potential diagnosis of the problem. We explore how these tendencies show up in the classroom; we present alternative frameworks for stimulating better conversations across differences. These frameworks include promoting democratic civility (as opposed to niceness), understanding ourselves as works in progress (as opposed to engaging call-out and cancel culture), and creating the conditions for the call-in (as opposed to “ducking diversity”).\",\"PeriodicalId\":51740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Transformative Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Transformative Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15413446211062375\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transformative Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15413446211062375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

作为大学生教育工作者,我们注意到学生在跨越意识形态差异进行有意义参与的能力方面存在一种困难模式。在这项工作中,我们认为社交媒体思维倾向于简化框架和群体外羞辱是对这个问题的潜在诊断。我们探究这些倾向是如何在课堂上表现出来的;我们提出了一些可供选择的框架,以促进跨越差异的更好对话。这些框架包括促进民主文明(而不是友善),将自己理解为正在进行的工作(而不是参与呼吁和取消文化),以及为呼吁创造条件(而不是“回避多样性”)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Forum: Challenging Students to Engage Meaningfully Across Ideological Differences
As college student educators, we notice a pattern of difficulty in our students’ ability to engage meaningfully across ideological differences. In this work, we posit the social media mindset’s penchant for reductive framing and outgroup shaming as a potential diagnosis of the problem. We explore how these tendencies show up in the classroom; we present alternative frameworks for stimulating better conversations across differences. These frameworks include promoting democratic civility (as opposed to niceness), understanding ourselves as works in progress (as opposed to engaging call-out and cancel culture), and creating the conditions for the call-in (as opposed to “ducking diversity”).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Transformative Education
Journal of Transformative Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The Journal of Transformative Education (JTED) is a peer-reviewed, scholarly journal focused on advancing the understanding, practice, and experience of transformative education. The journal seeks to deliver high academic quality in an engaging, thought-provoking, participative, and reflexive discourse across the spectrum of issues which transformational education encompasses. Those issues include individual experience, educational and institutional processes, formal and informal purposes and venues for such education, and cultural issues such as accessibility and social context for transformative education.
期刊最新文献
Book Review: Expanding Transformation Theory: Affinities between Jack Mezirow and Emancipatory Educationalists Truth and Transformation: The Test of Truth in the Development of New or Revised Ideas, and Related Values and Beliefs Metaphors of Transformation: Revealing and Concealing Book Review: Transformative Sustainability Education: Reimagining Our Future Perspective Transformation of Cultural Awareness: A Qualitative Study on Research Students’ Experiences of International Cross-Institutional Webinars
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1