解读印度农村女性劳动力供给的变化:基于以往NSSO数据集的经验证据

Ankit Kumar Singh
{"title":"解读印度农村女性劳动力供给的变化:基于以往NSSO数据集的经验证据","authors":"Ankit Kumar Singh","doi":"10.1177/00194662221137268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The female labour force participation rate (LFPR) in India has been persistently declining and has exhibited an unusual pattern over the years, which deviates from the discourse of a U-shaped relationship between female LFPR and economic growth. The article is an attempt to provide some of the empirical foundations to the female LFPR in rural India, and further delves into a comprehensive understanding of the effects of different factors like household, social, economic and personal factors, empirically through previous NSSO data sets. The data sets used in the study are from NSSO 50, that is, from 1993-94 to NSSO 66, that is, 2009-10, to ascertain the factors that were significant over the years in determining the female LFPR in rural areas. These variables were tested to gain an understanding on the variations in female labour supply in rural India. Being cognisant and by problematising some of the significant factors that affected the female LFPR in the past, the article demands the state to exercise policies beyond its neoliberal framework and the ‘Keynesian welfare-state’ model of ‘superficial’ social security. Methodologically, three models were further created based on the NSSO 66 data set to showcase the perennial discouraged-worker effects among the females in LFPR in rural India. The article further empirically tests Jacob Mincer’s theory: ‘substitution effect dominating the income effect’ in the decision of females entering the labour market in rural India and shows empirically how it does not hold in the Indian context, thereby an attempt on debunking the mainstream theory. JEL Codes: J10, J21, J64, C18","PeriodicalId":85705,"journal":{"name":"The Indian economic journal : the quarterly journal of the Indian Economic Association","volume":"71 1","pages":"878 - 894"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decoding the Variations in the Female Labour Supply in Rural India: Empirical Evidences Based on Previous NSSO Datasets\",\"authors\":\"Ankit Kumar Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00194662221137268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The female labour force participation rate (LFPR) in India has been persistently declining and has exhibited an unusual pattern over the years, which deviates from the discourse of a U-shaped relationship between female LFPR and economic growth. The article is an attempt to provide some of the empirical foundations to the female LFPR in rural India, and further delves into a comprehensive understanding of the effects of different factors like household, social, economic and personal factors, empirically through previous NSSO data sets. The data sets used in the study are from NSSO 50, that is, from 1993-94 to NSSO 66, that is, 2009-10, to ascertain the factors that were significant over the years in determining the female LFPR in rural areas. These variables were tested to gain an understanding on the variations in female labour supply in rural India. Being cognisant and by problematising some of the significant factors that affected the female LFPR in the past, the article demands the state to exercise policies beyond its neoliberal framework and the ‘Keynesian welfare-state’ model of ‘superficial’ social security. Methodologically, three models were further created based on the NSSO 66 data set to showcase the perennial discouraged-worker effects among the females in LFPR in rural India. The article further empirically tests Jacob Mincer’s theory: ‘substitution effect dominating the income effect’ in the decision of females entering the labour market in rural India and shows empirically how it does not hold in the Indian context, thereby an attempt on debunking the mainstream theory. JEL Codes: J10, J21, J64, C18\",\"PeriodicalId\":85705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Indian economic journal : the quarterly journal of the Indian Economic Association\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"878 - 894\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Indian economic journal : the quarterly journal of the Indian Economic Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00194662221137268\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Indian economic journal : the quarterly journal of the Indian Economic Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00194662221137268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

印度的女性劳动力参与率一直在下降,多年来表现出一种不同寻常的模式,这偏离了女性劳动力参与与经济增长之间U型关系的说法。本文试图为印度农村女性LFPR提供一些实证基础,并通过之前的NSSO数据集,进一步深入了解家庭、社会、经济和个人因素等不同因素的影响。研究中使用的数据集来自NSSO 50,即1993-94年至NSSO 66,即2009-10年,以确定多年来在确定农村地区女性LFPR方面具有重要意义的因素。对这些变量进行了测试,以了解印度农村女性劳动力供应的变化。由于认识到并质疑了过去影响女性LFPR的一些重要因素,文章要求国家执行超越其新自由主义框架和“肤浅”社会保障的“凯恩斯福利国家”模式的政策。在方法上,基于NSSO 66数据集进一步创建了三个模型,以展示印度农村LFPR女性中长期存在的气馁工人效应。本文进一步实证检验了Jacob Mincer的理论:“替代效应主导收入效应”在印度农村女性进入劳动力市场的决策中的作用,并实证表明它在印度背景下是不成立的,从而试图揭穿主流理论。JEL代码:J10、J21、J64、C18
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Decoding the Variations in the Female Labour Supply in Rural India: Empirical Evidences Based on Previous NSSO Datasets
The female labour force participation rate (LFPR) in India has been persistently declining and has exhibited an unusual pattern over the years, which deviates from the discourse of a U-shaped relationship between female LFPR and economic growth. The article is an attempt to provide some of the empirical foundations to the female LFPR in rural India, and further delves into a comprehensive understanding of the effects of different factors like household, social, economic and personal factors, empirically through previous NSSO data sets. The data sets used in the study are from NSSO 50, that is, from 1993-94 to NSSO 66, that is, 2009-10, to ascertain the factors that were significant over the years in determining the female LFPR in rural areas. These variables were tested to gain an understanding on the variations in female labour supply in rural India. Being cognisant and by problematising some of the significant factors that affected the female LFPR in the past, the article demands the state to exercise policies beyond its neoliberal framework and the ‘Keynesian welfare-state’ model of ‘superficial’ social security. Methodologically, three models were further created based on the NSSO 66 data set to showcase the perennial discouraged-worker effects among the females in LFPR in rural India. The article further empirically tests Jacob Mincer’s theory: ‘substitution effect dominating the income effect’ in the decision of females entering the labour market in rural India and shows empirically how it does not hold in the Indian context, thereby an attempt on debunking the mainstream theory. JEL Codes: J10, J21, J64, C18
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changing Employment Patterns: An Analysis of Rural Labour Force in Punjab Firm Size and Productivity in the Informal Sector: Evidence from India Revisiting India’s Export Potential: Modern Gravity Model Approach What Drives Corporate Saving in India? The Nexus Between Information Asymmetry and Liquidity of Stock: Evidence from the Indian Market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1