英国肾移植循环死亡后捐献延迟移植物功能定义的预测价值

IF 0.1 Q4 TRANSPLANTATION Transplant Research and Risk Management Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.2147/trrm.s320221
H. Stirnadel-Farrant, G. Mu, Selin Cooper-Blenkinsopp, R. Schroyer, K. Thorneloe, E. Harrison, S. M. Andrews
{"title":"英国肾移植循环死亡后捐献延迟移植物功能定义的预测价值","authors":"H. Stirnadel-Farrant, G. Mu, Selin Cooper-Blenkinsopp, R. Schroyer, K. Thorneloe, E. Harrison, S. M. Andrews","doi":"10.2147/trrm.s320221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: A variety of definitions for delayed graft function (DGF) have been proposed, but none has consistently been shown to be superior for predicting long-term graft outcomes for kidney donation after circulatory death (DCD) transplantation. In this study, real-world clinical outcome data following DCD transplantation were explored to determine the value of various DGF definitions for predicting graft survival. Patients and Methods: Data from 4 centers registered in the UK-based National Health Service Blood and Transplant registry (2010 to mid-2015) were used to assess 4 definitions of DGF in this retrospective chart review study. Results: Depending on the definition used, the frequency of DGF ranged from 119/362 (32.9%) when DGF was determined with available registry data and based on a requirement for dialysis within 7 days post-transplantation, to 224/315 (71.1%) when based on failure to achieve a 10% fall in serum creatinine (SCr) versus baseline per 24 hours averaged over the first 72 hours. Patients without clinical DGF as determined by a physician upon chart review, or when defined as <30% reduction in baseline SCr within 7 days post-transplantation with or without dialysis, had significantly better graft survival probability 1 year (hazard ratio 2.08 and 4.48, respectively) and 5 years post-transplant, whereas serum creatinine level over the first 72 hours post-transplant was not predictive of graft survival at 1 year. Patients with clinical DGF upon physician chart review also had higher SCr, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate levels, and were dialyzed more (2.3 days) versus patients without (0.2 days). Conclusion: Delayed graft function, determined clinically or using a functional definition, is associated with poorer renal function and remains a useful predictor of graft survival at 1 year after DCD kidney transplantation. not have DGF by these definitions had better kidney function at 30 days and at 1 year following their transplant. In conclusion, DGF using these definitions may help to predict long-term outcomes after DCD kidney transplantation.","PeriodicalId":41597,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Research and Risk Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive Value of Delayed Graft Function Definitions Following Donation After Circulatory Death Renal Transplantation in the United Kingdom\",\"authors\":\"H. Stirnadel-Farrant, G. Mu, Selin Cooper-Blenkinsopp, R. Schroyer, K. Thorneloe, E. Harrison, S. M. Andrews\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/trrm.s320221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: A variety of definitions for delayed graft function (DGF) have been proposed, but none has consistently been shown to be superior for predicting long-term graft outcomes for kidney donation after circulatory death (DCD) transplantation. In this study, real-world clinical outcome data following DCD transplantation were explored to determine the value of various DGF definitions for predicting graft survival. Patients and Methods: Data from 4 centers registered in the UK-based National Health Service Blood and Transplant registry (2010 to mid-2015) were used to assess 4 definitions of DGF in this retrospective chart review study. Results: Depending on the definition used, the frequency of DGF ranged from 119/362 (32.9%) when DGF was determined with available registry data and based on a requirement for dialysis within 7 days post-transplantation, to 224/315 (71.1%) when based on failure to achieve a 10% fall in serum creatinine (SCr) versus baseline per 24 hours averaged over the first 72 hours. Patients without clinical DGF as determined by a physician upon chart review, or when defined as <30% reduction in baseline SCr within 7 days post-transplantation with or without dialysis, had significantly better graft survival probability 1 year (hazard ratio 2.08 and 4.48, respectively) and 5 years post-transplant, whereas serum creatinine level over the first 72 hours post-transplant was not predictive of graft survival at 1 year. Patients with clinical DGF upon physician chart review also had higher SCr, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate levels, and were dialyzed more (2.3 days) versus patients without (0.2 days). Conclusion: Delayed graft function, determined clinically or using a functional definition, is associated with poorer renal function and remains a useful predictor of graft survival at 1 year after DCD kidney transplantation. not have DGF by these definitions had better kidney function at 30 days and at 1 year following their transplant. In conclusion, DGF using these definitions may help to predict long-term outcomes after DCD kidney transplantation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplant Research and Risk Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplant Research and Risk Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/trrm.s320221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPLANTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Research and Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/trrm.s320221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:关于延迟移植功能(DGF)的各种定义已经被提出,但没有一种定义被一致证明在预测循环死亡(DCD)移植后肾捐赠的长期移植结果方面具有优势。本研究探讨了DCD移植后的真实临床结果数据,以确定各种DGF定义在预测移植物存活方面的价值。患者和方法:在这项回顾性图表回顾研究中,来自英国国家卫生服务血液和移植登记处(2010年至2015年中期)注册的4个中心的数据用于评估DGF的4种定义。结果:根据所使用的定义,DGF的频率范围从根据可用登记数据确定DGF并基于移植后7天内透析需求的119/362(32.9%)到基于前72小时平均每24小时血清肌酐(SCr)与基线相比未能达到10%下降的224/315(71.1%)。由医生根据图表检查确定的无临床DGF的患者,或在移植后7天内基线SCr降低<30%(伴有或不伴有透析)的患者,移植后1年和5年的移植物生存率显著提高(风险比分别为2.08和4.48),而移植后前72小时的血清肌酐水平并不能预测移植后1年的移植物存活率。临床DGF患者的SCr更高,估计肾小球滤过率水平更低,透析时间更长(2.3天),而非患者(0.2天)。结论:延迟的移植物功能,无论是临床确定还是使用功能定义,都与较差的肾功能相关,并且仍然是DCD肾移植后1年移植物存活的有用预测指标。没有DGF的患者在移植后30天和1年的肾脏功能更好。总之,使用这些定义的DGF可能有助于预测DCD肾移植后的长期预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictive Value of Delayed Graft Function Definitions Following Donation After Circulatory Death Renal Transplantation in the United Kingdom
Purpose: A variety of definitions for delayed graft function (DGF) have been proposed, but none has consistently been shown to be superior for predicting long-term graft outcomes for kidney donation after circulatory death (DCD) transplantation. In this study, real-world clinical outcome data following DCD transplantation were explored to determine the value of various DGF definitions for predicting graft survival. Patients and Methods: Data from 4 centers registered in the UK-based National Health Service Blood and Transplant registry (2010 to mid-2015) were used to assess 4 definitions of DGF in this retrospective chart review study. Results: Depending on the definition used, the frequency of DGF ranged from 119/362 (32.9%) when DGF was determined with available registry data and based on a requirement for dialysis within 7 days post-transplantation, to 224/315 (71.1%) when based on failure to achieve a 10% fall in serum creatinine (SCr) versus baseline per 24 hours averaged over the first 72 hours. Patients without clinical DGF as determined by a physician upon chart review, or when defined as <30% reduction in baseline SCr within 7 days post-transplantation with or without dialysis, had significantly better graft survival probability 1 year (hazard ratio 2.08 and 4.48, respectively) and 5 years post-transplant, whereas serum creatinine level over the first 72 hours post-transplant was not predictive of graft survival at 1 year. Patients with clinical DGF upon physician chart review also had higher SCr, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate levels, and were dialyzed more (2.3 days) versus patients without (0.2 days). Conclusion: Delayed graft function, determined clinically or using a functional definition, is associated with poorer renal function and remains a useful predictor of graft survival at 1 year after DCD kidney transplantation. not have DGF by these definitions had better kidney function at 30 days and at 1 year following their transplant. In conclusion, DGF using these definitions may help to predict long-term outcomes after DCD kidney transplantation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Tacrolimus Trough Level Variation and Its Correlation to Clinical Outcomes and Consequences in Solid Organ Transplantation Kidney Transplant Recipients with JC Virus Infection Have Decreased Function of the Transplanted Kidney A Unique Case of Tacrolimus-Induced Dysphagia and Dysarthria in the Absence of Diagnostic Findings Predictive Value of Delayed Graft Function Definitions Following Donation After Circulatory Death Renal Transplantation in the United Kingdom Prophylaxis of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Solid Organ Transplantation, Retrospective Evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1