伦敦的私人收藏、展览和艺术史的塑造:伯灵顿美术俱乐部,斯泰西·j·皮尔森著

IF 0.3 0 ART Visual Resources Pub Date : 2018-02-13 DOI:10.1080/01973762.2018.1432207
J. Codell
{"title":"伦敦的私人收藏、展览和艺术史的塑造:伯灵顿美术俱乐部,斯泰西·j·皮尔森著","authors":"J. Codell","doi":"10.1080/01973762.2018.1432207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stacey Pierson’s book has many implications for art market studies, archival research, and the study of the social nature of art world activities – collecting, exhibiting, and the development, indeed even the creation or invention, of public taste. Focusing on the history of the Burlington Fine Arts Club (BFAC), founded in 1866 as a gentleman’s club to exhibit its members’ art collections, the history of this club, kept in a rich archive, provides a magnified examination of an organization devoted to intense collecting, exhibiting, dealing and dissemination by catalogs of a collective field of knowledge. Unique among such clubs were its regular and special biannual exhibitions, the latter with catalogs and open by invitation to the public. Its members were collectors, curators, politicians, from across social categories (e.g. MPs, aristocrats, bankers, artists, diplomats, museum professionals) who organized these events that were both private and public. Some members and contributors were women. Their catalogs and exhibitions expressed not only their tastes but also their “associated specialists’ view of connoisseurship, art history and thematic display” (x), a profound nexus of knowledge and expertise by specialists and collectors who organized and thematized their collections as repositories of knowledge and also expressive of a discourse on art across a wide and often innovative variety of collected objects. Pierson hit the jackpot with a rich archive of the club’s meeting minutes, activities, and catalogs. She rightly sees these activities as formative of both professional curating and scholarship and of public taste and knowledge of art and objets d’art. Her argument for the importance of the club includes her claim that the club’s activities demonstrated “that the so-called ‘global turn’ in art history began to take place well before the midtwentieth century” (xi). Of course, the global turn began much sooner, with private collections by civil servants of the East India Company and eighteenth-century Chinoiserie, and became a public topic through the 1851 Great Exhibition with the then-stunning revelation that Middle Eastern and Indian art objects, and to a lesser extent Continental objects, bested British manufactured goods, sparking the collecting of non-European objects by the South Kensington Museum (later the V&A).","PeriodicalId":41894,"journal":{"name":"Visual Resources","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01973762.2018.1432207","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Private Collecting, Exhibition and the Shaping of Art History in London: The Burlington Fine Arts Club, by Stacey J. Pierson\",\"authors\":\"J. Codell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01973762.2018.1432207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Stacey Pierson’s book has many implications for art market studies, archival research, and the study of the social nature of art world activities – collecting, exhibiting, and the development, indeed even the creation or invention, of public taste. Focusing on the history of the Burlington Fine Arts Club (BFAC), founded in 1866 as a gentleman’s club to exhibit its members’ art collections, the history of this club, kept in a rich archive, provides a magnified examination of an organization devoted to intense collecting, exhibiting, dealing and dissemination by catalogs of a collective field of knowledge. Unique among such clubs were its regular and special biannual exhibitions, the latter with catalogs and open by invitation to the public. Its members were collectors, curators, politicians, from across social categories (e.g. MPs, aristocrats, bankers, artists, diplomats, museum professionals) who organized these events that were both private and public. Some members and contributors were women. Their catalogs and exhibitions expressed not only their tastes but also their “associated specialists’ view of connoisseurship, art history and thematic display” (x), a profound nexus of knowledge and expertise by specialists and collectors who organized and thematized their collections as repositories of knowledge and also expressive of a discourse on art across a wide and often innovative variety of collected objects. Pierson hit the jackpot with a rich archive of the club’s meeting minutes, activities, and catalogs. She rightly sees these activities as formative of both professional curating and scholarship and of public taste and knowledge of art and objets d’art. Her argument for the importance of the club includes her claim that the club’s activities demonstrated “that the so-called ‘global turn’ in art history began to take place well before the midtwentieth century” (xi). Of course, the global turn began much sooner, with private collections by civil servants of the East India Company and eighteenth-century Chinoiserie, and became a public topic through the 1851 Great Exhibition with the then-stunning revelation that Middle Eastern and Indian art objects, and to a lesser extent Continental objects, bested British manufactured goods, sparking the collecting of non-European objects by the South Kensington Museum (later the V&A).\",\"PeriodicalId\":41894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Visual Resources\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01973762.2018.1432207\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Visual Resources\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01973762.2018.1432207\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visual Resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01973762.2018.1432207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

斯泰西·皮尔森的书对艺术市场研究、档案研究和艺术世界活动的社会性质的研究——收藏、展览和公众品味的发展,甚至是创造或发明——有很多启示。伯灵顿美术俱乐部(Burlington Fine Arts Club,简称BFAC)成立于1866年,最初是一个绅士俱乐部,旨在展示其成员的艺术收藏。本书以该俱乐部的历史为重点,保存在丰富的档案中,通过一个集体知识领域的目录,为一个致力于密集收集、展览、交易和传播的组织提供了一个放大的考察。在这些俱乐部中,独特的是它的定期和特别的两年一次的展览,后者有目录,并邀请公众开放。它的成员是收藏家、策展人、政治家,来自各个社会阶层(如国会议员、贵族、银行家、艺术家、外交官、博物馆专业人士),他们组织这些私人和公共活动。一些成员和撰稿人是妇女。他们的目录和展览不仅表达了他们的品味,也表达了他们“相关专家对鉴赏、艺术史和主题展示的看法”(x),这是专家和收藏家之间知识和专业知识的深刻联系,他们组织和主题化了他们的藏品,作为知识的宝库,也表达了一种关于艺术的话语,这种话语跨越了广泛的、经常是创新的各种收藏对象。皮尔逊中了头彩,他拥有丰富的俱乐部会议记录、活动和目录档案。她正确地将这些活动视为专业策展和学术以及公众对艺术和艺术品的品味和知识的形成。她对该俱乐部重要性的论证包括,她声称该俱乐部的活动表明“艺术史上所谓的‘全球转向’早在20世纪中叶就开始了”(xi)。当然,全球转向开始得更早,东印度公司公务员的私人收藏和18世纪的中国风格,并通过1851年的大展览成为了一个公众话题,当时令人震惊的是,中东和印度的艺术品,以及较小程度上的欧洲大陆的物品,击败了英国的制成品,引发了南肯辛顿博物馆(后来的V&A)收集非欧洲物品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Private Collecting, Exhibition and the Shaping of Art History in London: The Burlington Fine Arts Club, by Stacey J. Pierson
Stacey Pierson’s book has many implications for art market studies, archival research, and the study of the social nature of art world activities – collecting, exhibiting, and the development, indeed even the creation or invention, of public taste. Focusing on the history of the Burlington Fine Arts Club (BFAC), founded in 1866 as a gentleman’s club to exhibit its members’ art collections, the history of this club, kept in a rich archive, provides a magnified examination of an organization devoted to intense collecting, exhibiting, dealing and dissemination by catalogs of a collective field of knowledge. Unique among such clubs were its regular and special biannual exhibitions, the latter with catalogs and open by invitation to the public. Its members were collectors, curators, politicians, from across social categories (e.g. MPs, aristocrats, bankers, artists, diplomats, museum professionals) who organized these events that were both private and public. Some members and contributors were women. Their catalogs and exhibitions expressed not only their tastes but also their “associated specialists’ view of connoisseurship, art history and thematic display” (x), a profound nexus of knowledge and expertise by specialists and collectors who organized and thematized their collections as repositories of knowledge and also expressive of a discourse on art across a wide and often innovative variety of collected objects. Pierson hit the jackpot with a rich archive of the club’s meeting minutes, activities, and catalogs. She rightly sees these activities as formative of both professional curating and scholarship and of public taste and knowledge of art and objets d’art. Her argument for the importance of the club includes her claim that the club’s activities demonstrated “that the so-called ‘global turn’ in art history began to take place well before the midtwentieth century” (xi). Of course, the global turn began much sooner, with private collections by civil servants of the East India Company and eighteenth-century Chinoiserie, and became a public topic through the 1851 Great Exhibition with the then-stunning revelation that Middle Eastern and Indian art objects, and to a lesser extent Continental objects, bested British manufactured goods, sparking the collecting of non-European objects by the South Kensington Museum (later the V&A).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
There Is a Digital Art History Creative-aesthetic product design and tools ‘Constructing a Critical Situation’: A Data-Based Approach to the Study of Cultural Periodicals and Art Criticism How Do Ecological Emotions Emerge? An Analysis of Contemporary Swiss Eco-documentaries The Emotions of the Late Anthropocene in Visual Arts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1