铝、石墨和铅的伽马射线累积因子的计算

H. Qadr
{"title":"铝、石墨和铅的伽马射线累积因子的计算","authors":"H. Qadr","doi":"10.1504/IJNEST.2019.10020880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this work was to investigate and quantify the linear attenuation coefficient and the buildup factor for different materials. The linear attenuation coefficient of absorber materials such as graphite was (0.097 cm‒1), whereas it was observed (0.136 cm‒1) for aluminium, and lead was (0.596 cm‒1). By using the gamma radiation energies emitted from 60Co source with 1332 keV, experimental and theoretical values are in a good agreement. Attenuation coefficient was measured by using counts of good geometry and bad geometry. The result shows that the linear attenuation is higher for lead and better radiation shielding compared with graphite and aluminium. Furthermore, buildup factor decreases with increasing thickness of the absorber material.","PeriodicalId":35144,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nuclear Energy Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Calculation for gamma ray buildup factor for aluminium, graphite and lead\",\"authors\":\"H. Qadr\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJNEST.2019.10020880\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this work was to investigate and quantify the linear attenuation coefficient and the buildup factor for different materials. The linear attenuation coefficient of absorber materials such as graphite was (0.097 cm‒1), whereas it was observed (0.136 cm‒1) for aluminium, and lead was (0.596 cm‒1). By using the gamma radiation energies emitted from 60Co source with 1332 keV, experimental and theoretical values are in a good agreement. Attenuation coefficient was measured by using counts of good geometry and bad geometry. The result shows that the linear attenuation is higher for lead and better radiation shielding compared with graphite and aluminium. Furthermore, buildup factor decreases with increasing thickness of the absorber material.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nuclear Energy Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nuclear Energy Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJNEST.2019.10020880\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Energy\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nuclear Energy Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJNEST.2019.10020880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Energy","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

这项工作的目的是研究和量化不同材料的线性衰减系数和堆积因子。石墨等吸收材料的线性衰减系数为(0.097 cm-1),而铝和铅的线性衰减率为(0.136 cm-1)。利用1332keV的60Co源发射的伽马辐射能量,实验值与理论值吻合较好。衰减系数是通过使用良好几何形状和不良几何形状的计数来测量的。结果表明,与石墨和铝相比,铅的线性衰减更高,辐射屏蔽效果更好。此外,堆积因子随着吸收材料厚度的增加而减小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Calculation for gamma ray buildup factor for aluminium, graphite and lead
The purpose of this work was to investigate and quantify the linear attenuation coefficient and the buildup factor for different materials. The linear attenuation coefficient of absorber materials such as graphite was (0.097 cm‒1), whereas it was observed (0.136 cm‒1) for aluminium, and lead was (0.596 cm‒1). By using the gamma radiation energies emitted from 60Co source with 1332 keV, experimental and theoretical values are in a good agreement. Attenuation coefficient was measured by using counts of good geometry and bad geometry. The result shows that the linear attenuation is higher for lead and better radiation shielding compared with graphite and aluminium. Furthermore, buildup factor decreases with increasing thickness of the absorber material.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: Today, nuclear reactors generate nearly one quarter of the electricity in nations representing two thirds of humanity, and other nuclear applications are integral to many aspects of the world economy. Nuclear fission remains an important option for meeting energy requirements and maintaining a balanced worldwide energy policy; with major countries expanding nuclear energy"s role and new countries poised to introduce it, the key issue is not whether the use of nuclear technology will grow worldwide, even if public opinion concerning safety, the economics of nuclear power, and waste disposal issues adversely affect the general acceptance of nuclear power, but whether it will grow fast enough to make a decisive contribution to the global imperative of sustainable development.
期刊最新文献
Molecular Dynamic Studies of the Transesterification Process Using Strontium Oxide as an Effective Catalyst for Biodiesel Production Research Progress on SiC Composite Materials, Electrolyte Additives and Binders of Negative Electrodes Progress in Preparation of Transesterification Catalyzed by Composite Hydrotalcite Optimization of Hydrogen Injection Flow Rate for Hydrogen Internal Combustion Engines Based on IQGA Study on the Performance of Abandoned Medical Masks in Drilling Fluid Under the Background of "COVID-19"
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1