探索美国军事基地政治的公民抵抗方法:以厄瓜多尔曼塔为例

Q2 Arts and Humanities Middle Atlantic Review of Latin American Studies Pub Date : 2018-06-30 DOI:10.23870/MARLAS.177
Anna Ikeda
{"title":"探索美国军事基地政治的公民抵抗方法:以厄瓜多尔曼塔为例","authors":"Anna Ikeda","doi":"10.23870/MARLAS.177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"U.S. troops withdrew from the forward operating location (FOL) in Manta, Ecuador, in 2009 after a decade of presence. The withdrawal was celebrated not only by Ecuadorian activists, who had protested the FOL since it was established in 1999, but also by anti-U.S. military base movements around the world, which became connected through the transnational “No Bases” network and considered this a “people’s victory.” To advance our understanding of the role of such movements and their agency in U.S. military base politics, I borrow from civil resistance literature that holds a pluralistic view of power and examine the campaign to close the FOL in Manta through the lens of this conceptual framework, which revealed some limitations to the approach. I discuss areas that require further improvements in order for the framework to offer more rigorous explanations of anti-U.S. military base campaigns and their outcomes.","PeriodicalId":36126,"journal":{"name":"Middle Atlantic Review of Latin American Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring a Civil Resistance Approach to Examining U.S. Military Base Politics: The Case of Manta, Ecuador\",\"authors\":\"Anna Ikeda\",\"doi\":\"10.23870/MARLAS.177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"U.S. troops withdrew from the forward operating location (FOL) in Manta, Ecuador, in 2009 after a decade of presence. The withdrawal was celebrated not only by Ecuadorian activists, who had protested the FOL since it was established in 1999, but also by anti-U.S. military base movements around the world, which became connected through the transnational “No Bases” network and considered this a “people’s victory.” To advance our understanding of the role of such movements and their agency in U.S. military base politics, I borrow from civil resistance literature that holds a pluralistic view of power and examine the campaign to close the FOL in Manta through the lens of this conceptual framework, which revealed some limitations to the approach. I discuss areas that require further improvements in order for the framework to offer more rigorous explanations of anti-U.S. military base campaigns and their outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Middle Atlantic Review of Latin American Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Middle Atlantic Review of Latin American Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23870/MARLAS.177\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle Atlantic Review of Latin American Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23870/MARLAS.177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

美军在驻扎了十年后,于2009年从厄瓜多尔曼塔的前沿作战基地撤出。厄瓜多尔活动人士不仅庆祝撤军,他们自1999年FOL成立以来一直抗议FOL,世界各地的反美军事基地运动也庆祝撤军,这些运动通过跨国“无基地”网络建立了联系,并认为这是“人民的胜利”。“为了加深我们对这些运动及其在美国军事基地政治中的作用的理解,我借用了对权力持多元观点的民间抵抗文献,并通过这个概念框架的视角来审视关闭曼塔FOL的运动,这揭示了这种方法的一些局限性。我讨论了需要进一步改进的领域,以便该框架对反美军事基地战役及其结果提供更严格的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring a Civil Resistance Approach to Examining U.S. Military Base Politics: The Case of Manta, Ecuador
U.S. troops withdrew from the forward operating location (FOL) in Manta, Ecuador, in 2009 after a decade of presence. The withdrawal was celebrated not only by Ecuadorian activists, who had protested the FOL since it was established in 1999, but also by anti-U.S. military base movements around the world, which became connected through the transnational “No Bases” network and considered this a “people’s victory.” To advance our understanding of the role of such movements and their agency in U.S. military base politics, I borrow from civil resistance literature that holds a pluralistic view of power and examine the campaign to close the FOL in Manta through the lens of this conceptual framework, which revealed some limitations to the approach. I discuss areas that require further improvements in order for the framework to offer more rigorous explanations of anti-U.S. military base campaigns and their outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Middle Atlantic Review of Latin American Studies
Middle Atlantic Review of Latin American Studies Arts and Humanities-Arts and Humanities (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Migration and Invisibility in the Americas: The Importance of Non-State Actors Brokering Protection for People on the Move Review / Reseña. Aviva Chomsky. Central America’s Forgotten History: Revolution, Violence, and the Roots of Migration. 2021 Review / Reseña. Paula Cucurella. Jacques Derrida & Nicanor Parra. Ensayo sobre la poesía en tiempos de censura. 2021 Speaking a Motherless Tongue: Translation as Decolonial Praxis in Valeria Luiselli’s Tell Me How it Ends: An Essay in Forty Questions Review / Reseña. Consuelo Meza Márquez. Reinvención de nuestra identidad como mujeres viejas: Cuerpo, sexualidad y resiliencia. 2021
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1