Anne Ganteaume, Bastien Romero, Catherine Fernandez, Elena Ormeño, Caroline Lecareux
{"title":"挥发性和半挥发性萜烯影响叶片可燃性:根据萜烯鉴定水平的差异","authors":"Anne Ganteaume, Bastien Romero, Catherine Fernandez, Elena Ormeño, Caroline Lecareux","doi":"10.1007/s00049-021-00349-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In flammability assessment, the terpene effect is usually studied using their total or subgroup content, missing, therefore, the information that could be provided by the molecules themselves. In this study, the specific role of terpenes on leaf flammability was sought comparing different levels of terpene identification—total, subgroup (i.e. mono-, sesqui-, and diterpene), and single compound—as well as their interactions with fuel moisture content (FMC) in four species common in Mediterranean Wildland–Urban Interfaces (<i>Pinus halepensis</i>, <i>Cupressocyparis leylandii</i>, <i>Hesperocyparis arizonica</i>, <i>Cupressus sempervirens</i>). <i>Pinus halepensis</i> was the most flammable species (low FMC and higher sesquiterpene content but low terpene diversity) while <i>Cupressocyparis leylandii</i> presented the highest terpene diversity and total terpene content (higher mono- and diterpene content). Flammability was differently affected according to the terpene identification level used in the models. The effects ranged from non-significant for most species studied, using subgroup or total terpene content, to mostly significant, using single compound content. Regarding the former, the lack of significant results could be due to opposite effects of different single compounds within a terpene subgroup. For the latter, terpene molecules driving flammability and their effects (positive or negative) differed among species. A cumulative effect with FMC was also highlighted in some cases but terpenes mostly remained the main flammability drivers regardless of the species. Using the refined terpene level in modelling allowed a better understanding of the compounds’ role on flammability, which is useful in the identification of plant traits linked to flammability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":515,"journal":{"name":"Chemoecology","volume":"31 4","pages":"259 - 275"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00049-021-00349-1","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Volatile and semi-volatile terpenes impact leaf flammability: differences according to the level of terpene identification\",\"authors\":\"Anne Ganteaume, Bastien Romero, Catherine Fernandez, Elena Ormeño, Caroline Lecareux\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00049-021-00349-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In flammability assessment, the terpene effect is usually studied using their total or subgroup content, missing, therefore, the information that could be provided by the molecules themselves. In this study, the specific role of terpenes on leaf flammability was sought comparing different levels of terpene identification—total, subgroup (i.e. mono-, sesqui-, and diterpene), and single compound—as well as their interactions with fuel moisture content (FMC) in four species common in Mediterranean Wildland–Urban Interfaces (<i>Pinus halepensis</i>, <i>Cupressocyparis leylandii</i>, <i>Hesperocyparis arizonica</i>, <i>Cupressus sempervirens</i>). <i>Pinus halepensis</i> was the most flammable species (low FMC and higher sesquiterpene content but low terpene diversity) while <i>Cupressocyparis leylandii</i> presented the highest terpene diversity and total terpene content (higher mono- and diterpene content). Flammability was differently affected according to the terpene identification level used in the models. The effects ranged from non-significant for most species studied, using subgroup or total terpene content, to mostly significant, using single compound content. Regarding the former, the lack of significant results could be due to opposite effects of different single compounds within a terpene subgroup. For the latter, terpene molecules driving flammability and their effects (positive or negative) differed among species. A cumulative effect with FMC was also highlighted in some cases but terpenes mostly remained the main flammability drivers regardless of the species. Using the refined terpene level in modelling allowed a better understanding of the compounds’ role on flammability, which is useful in the identification of plant traits linked to flammability.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemoecology\",\"volume\":\"31 4\",\"pages\":\"259 - 275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00049-021-00349-1\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemoecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00049-021-00349-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemoecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00049-021-00349-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Volatile and semi-volatile terpenes impact leaf flammability: differences according to the level of terpene identification
In flammability assessment, the terpene effect is usually studied using their total or subgroup content, missing, therefore, the information that could be provided by the molecules themselves. In this study, the specific role of terpenes on leaf flammability was sought comparing different levels of terpene identification—total, subgroup (i.e. mono-, sesqui-, and diterpene), and single compound—as well as their interactions with fuel moisture content (FMC) in four species common in Mediterranean Wildland–Urban Interfaces (Pinus halepensis, Cupressocyparis leylandii, Hesperocyparis arizonica, Cupressus sempervirens). Pinus halepensis was the most flammable species (low FMC and higher sesquiterpene content but low terpene diversity) while Cupressocyparis leylandii presented the highest terpene diversity and total terpene content (higher mono- and diterpene content). Flammability was differently affected according to the terpene identification level used in the models. The effects ranged from non-significant for most species studied, using subgroup or total terpene content, to mostly significant, using single compound content. Regarding the former, the lack of significant results could be due to opposite effects of different single compounds within a terpene subgroup. For the latter, terpene molecules driving flammability and their effects (positive or negative) differed among species. A cumulative effect with FMC was also highlighted in some cases but terpenes mostly remained the main flammability drivers regardless of the species. Using the refined terpene level in modelling allowed a better understanding of the compounds’ role on flammability, which is useful in the identification of plant traits linked to flammability.
期刊介绍:
It is the aim of Chemoecology to promote and stimulate basic science in the field of chemical ecology by publishing research papers that integrate evolution and/or ecology and chemistry in an attempt to increase our understanding of the biological significance of natural products. Its scopes cover the evolutionary biology, mechanisms and chemistry of biotic interactions and the evolution and synthesis of the underlying natural products. Manuscripts on the evolution and ecology of trophic relationships, intra- and interspecific communication, competition, and other kinds of chemical communication in all types of organismic interactions will be considered suitable for publication. Ecological studies of trophic interactions will be considered also if they are based on the information of the transmission of natural products (e.g. fatty acids) through the food-chain. Chemoecology further publishes papers that relate to the evolution and ecology of interactions mediated by non-volatile compounds (e.g. adhesive secretions). Mechanistic approaches may include the identification, biosynthesis and metabolism of substances that carry information and the elucidation of receptor- and transduction systems using physiological, biochemical and molecular techniques. Papers describing the structure and functional morphology of organs involved in chemical communication will also be considered.