身份和访问管理的新方向和挑战

Daniela Pöhn, Wolfgang Hommel
{"title":"身份和访问管理的新方向和挑战","authors":"Daniela Pöhn, Wolfgang Hommel","doi":"10.1109/MCOMSTD.0006.2200077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Identity and access management is a core building block for the majority of web services. Cloud-based services, social webs, mobile apps, but also IoT-related services rely on identity management to provide a seamless and secure user experience. Transmitting and sharing sensitive information with other organizations always poses a security and privacy risk to all participating entities. One solution to tackle this problem is the principle of federated identity management (FIM). FIM is used to authenticate and authorize users across multiple organizations and platforms in order to obtain access to resources and services. The benefits of FIM are, for example, consistent data, reduced amount of sensitive information needed to be shared, as well as less passwords for the user to remember. Both predominant standards, Secure Assertion Markup Language (SAML) 2.0 and Open Authentication (OAuth) 2.0 with the authentication layer OpenID Connect, are in wide-spread practical use for at least a decade. However, these protocols were developed with different requirements in mind than nowadays present. This led to several extensions to tackle real-world problems, making it cumbersome to comply with every flavor. Also, Request for Comments (RFC) 8252 suggests that a native app opens a system browser for user authentication; consequently, new protocols are currently developed. For example, within Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), Kantara Initiative, and OpenID Foundation, which (should) have three main goals in common: • Reducing the complexity in contrast to SAML 2.0 and OAuth 2.0. • Decreasing the amount of extensions and varieties found in the wild. Both help developers to comply with the standards and, consequently, increase the security. • Including edge and future use cases, making the protocols even more useful. This article gives insights into current developments and possible future paths.","PeriodicalId":36719,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Communications Standards Magazine","volume":"7 1","pages":"84-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Directions and Challenges within Identity and Access Management\",\"authors\":\"Daniela Pöhn, Wolfgang Hommel\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MCOMSTD.0006.2200077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Identity and access management is a core building block for the majority of web services. Cloud-based services, social webs, mobile apps, but also IoT-related services rely on identity management to provide a seamless and secure user experience. Transmitting and sharing sensitive information with other organizations always poses a security and privacy risk to all participating entities. One solution to tackle this problem is the principle of federated identity management (FIM). FIM is used to authenticate and authorize users across multiple organizations and platforms in order to obtain access to resources and services. The benefits of FIM are, for example, consistent data, reduced amount of sensitive information needed to be shared, as well as less passwords for the user to remember. Both predominant standards, Secure Assertion Markup Language (SAML) 2.0 and Open Authentication (OAuth) 2.0 with the authentication layer OpenID Connect, are in wide-spread practical use for at least a decade. However, these protocols were developed with different requirements in mind than nowadays present. This led to several extensions to tackle real-world problems, making it cumbersome to comply with every flavor. Also, Request for Comments (RFC) 8252 suggests that a native app opens a system browser for user authentication; consequently, new protocols are currently developed. For example, within Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), Kantara Initiative, and OpenID Foundation, which (should) have three main goals in common: • Reducing the complexity in contrast to SAML 2.0 and OAuth 2.0. • Decreasing the amount of extensions and varieties found in the wild. Both help developers to comply with the standards and, consequently, increase the security. • Including edge and future use cases, making the protocols even more useful. This article gives insights into current developments and possible future paths.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Communications Standards Magazine\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"84-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Communications Standards Magazine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOMSTD.0006.2200077\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Communications Standards Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOMSTD.0006.2200077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

身份和访问管理是大多数web服务的核心构建块。基于云的服务、社交网络、移动应用程序以及物联网相关服务都依赖于身份管理,以提供无缝和安全的用户体验。与其他组织传输和共享敏感信息总是给所有参与实体带来安全和隐私风险。解决这个问题的一个解决方案是联合身份管理(FIM)原则。FIM用于跨多个组织和平台对用户进行身份验证和授权,以便获得对资源和服务的访问权限。例如,FIM的好处是数据一致,减少了需要共享的敏感信息量,以及减少了用户需要记住的密码。安全断言标记语言(SAML)2.0和具有身份验证层OpenID Connect的开放身份验证(OAuth)2.0这两个主要标准都在实际应用中广泛使用了至少十年。然而,这些协议的开发考虑到了与目前不同的要求。这导致了一些扩展来解决现实世界中的问题,使得遵守每种口味都很麻烦。此外,征求意见(RFC)8252建议本地应用程序打开系统浏览器进行用户身份验证;因此,目前正在开发新的协议。例如,在互联网工程任务组(IETF)、Kantara Initiative和OpenID Foundation中,它们(应该)有三个共同的主要目标:•与SAML 2.0和OAuth 2.0相比,降低复杂性。•减少在野外发现的扩展和变种的数量。两者都有助于开发人员遵守标准,从而提高安全性。•包括边缘和未来的用例,使协议更加有用。这篇文章对当前的发展和未来可能的道路提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
New Directions and Challenges within Identity and Access Management
Identity and access management is a core building block for the majority of web services. Cloud-based services, social webs, mobile apps, but also IoT-related services rely on identity management to provide a seamless and secure user experience. Transmitting and sharing sensitive information with other organizations always poses a security and privacy risk to all participating entities. One solution to tackle this problem is the principle of federated identity management (FIM). FIM is used to authenticate and authorize users across multiple organizations and platforms in order to obtain access to resources and services. The benefits of FIM are, for example, consistent data, reduced amount of sensitive information needed to be shared, as well as less passwords for the user to remember. Both predominant standards, Secure Assertion Markup Language (SAML) 2.0 and Open Authentication (OAuth) 2.0 with the authentication layer OpenID Connect, are in wide-spread practical use for at least a decade. However, these protocols were developed with different requirements in mind than nowadays present. This led to several extensions to tackle real-world problems, making it cumbersome to comply with every flavor. Also, Request for Comments (RFC) 8252 suggests that a native app opens a system browser for user authentication; consequently, new protocols are currently developed. For example, within Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), Kantara Initiative, and OpenID Foundation, which (should) have three main goals in common: • Reducing the complexity in contrast to SAML 2.0 and OAuth 2.0. • Decreasing the amount of extensions and varieties found in the wild. Both help developers to comply with the standards and, consequently, increase the security. • Including edge and future use cases, making the protocols even more useful. This article gives insights into current developments and possible future paths.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
期刊最新文献
IEEE 802.11BB Reference Channel Models For Light Communications Interface To Security Functions: An Overview And Comparison Of I2nsf And Openc2 Further Enhanced Urllc And Industrial IoT Support With Release-17 5g New Radio A Secure Ndn-based Architecture For Electronic Voting In 6g Space-air-ground Integrated Networks For Urllc In Spatial Digital Twins
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1