Amin Abolhasani Foroughi, B. Zeinali-Rafsanjani, Masoume Nazeri, M. Saeedi-Moghadam, A. Torkaman
{"title":"脑多发性硬化症(MS)斑块体积的量化:用药前后连续磁共振图像中脑MS斑块体积的定量和定性评估的比较","authors":"Amin Abolhasani Foroughi, B. Zeinali-Rafsanjani, Masoume Nazeri, M. Saeedi-Moghadam, A. Torkaman","doi":"10.5812/iranjradiol.105630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a demyelinating disease with multiple symptoms. To examine the effect of medications, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging can be performed. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the visual assessment of MRI images by physicians and the results of a MATLAB-based software developed for evaluating the MS plaque volume. Methods: TYSABRI (natalizumab)-treated patients were enrolled in this study. MRI was performed before and after treatment. A MATLAB-based software was developed to evaluate the MRI images. The images were then subjectively evaluated by three specialists and objectively assessed by the software, and the results were then compared. Results: Thirty-five patients participated in this study. According to the software, the status of 37.14% of the patients improved; however, 62.86% of cases deteriorated after a year of treatment. There was less than 50% agreement between the physicians and less than 55% agreement between the physicians and the software results. A disagreement of almost 45% was observed between the physicians and the software results, as in some cases, small changes were detected in successive images. The second cause of disagreement could be the physicians’ expectations; although the patient’s recovery was highly expected in some cases, their condition deteriorated. Conclusions: The results revealed that the objective assessment of sequential MRI images of MS patients reduced human errors and improved the evaluation of this disease.","PeriodicalId":50273,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantification of the Brain Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Plaque Volume: Comparison of Quantitative and Qualitative Assessments of the Brain MS Plaque Volume in Successive Magnetic Resonance Images before and after Medication Use\",\"authors\":\"Amin Abolhasani Foroughi, B. Zeinali-Rafsanjani, Masoume Nazeri, M. Saeedi-Moghadam, A. Torkaman\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/iranjradiol.105630\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a demyelinating disease with multiple symptoms. To examine the effect of medications, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging can be performed. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the visual assessment of MRI images by physicians and the results of a MATLAB-based software developed for evaluating the MS plaque volume. Methods: TYSABRI (natalizumab)-treated patients were enrolled in this study. MRI was performed before and after treatment. A MATLAB-based software was developed to evaluate the MRI images. The images were then subjectively evaluated by three specialists and objectively assessed by the software, and the results were then compared. Results: Thirty-five patients participated in this study. According to the software, the status of 37.14% of the patients improved; however, 62.86% of cases deteriorated after a year of treatment. There was less than 50% agreement between the physicians and less than 55% agreement between the physicians and the software results. A disagreement of almost 45% was observed between the physicians and the software results, as in some cases, small changes were detected in successive images. The second cause of disagreement could be the physicians’ expectations; although the patient’s recovery was highly expected in some cases, their condition deteriorated. Conclusions: The results revealed that the objective assessment of sequential MRI images of MS patients reduced human errors and improved the evaluation of this disease.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.105630\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.105630","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quantification of the Brain Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Plaque Volume: Comparison of Quantitative and Qualitative Assessments of the Brain MS Plaque Volume in Successive Magnetic Resonance Images before and after Medication Use
Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a demyelinating disease with multiple symptoms. To examine the effect of medications, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging can be performed. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the visual assessment of MRI images by physicians and the results of a MATLAB-based software developed for evaluating the MS plaque volume. Methods: TYSABRI (natalizumab)-treated patients were enrolled in this study. MRI was performed before and after treatment. A MATLAB-based software was developed to evaluate the MRI images. The images were then subjectively evaluated by three specialists and objectively assessed by the software, and the results were then compared. Results: Thirty-five patients participated in this study. According to the software, the status of 37.14% of the patients improved; however, 62.86% of cases deteriorated after a year of treatment. There was less than 50% agreement between the physicians and less than 55% agreement between the physicians and the software results. A disagreement of almost 45% was observed between the physicians and the software results, as in some cases, small changes were detected in successive images. The second cause of disagreement could be the physicians’ expectations; although the patient’s recovery was highly expected in some cases, their condition deteriorated. Conclusions: The results revealed that the objective assessment of sequential MRI images of MS patients reduced human errors and improved the evaluation of this disease.
期刊介绍:
The Iranian Journal of Radiology is the official journal of Tehran University of Medical Sciences and the Iranian Society of Radiology. It is a scientific forum dedicated primarily to the topics relevant to radiology and allied sciences of the developing countries, which have been neglected or have received little attention in the Western medical literature.
This journal particularly welcomes manuscripts which deal with radiology and imaging from geographic regions wherein problems regarding economic, social, ethnic and cultural parameters affecting prevalence and course of the illness are taken into consideration.
The Iranian Journal of Radiology has been launched in order to interchange information in the field of radiology and other related scientific spheres. In accordance with the objective of developing the scientific ability of the radiological population and other related scientific fields, this journal publishes research articles, evidence-based review articles, and case reports focused on regional tropics.
Iranian Journal of Radiology operates in agreement with the below principles in compliance with continuous quality improvement:
1-Increasing the satisfaction of the readers, authors, staff, and co-workers.
2-Improving the scientific content and appearance of the journal.
3-Advancing the scientific validity of the journal both nationally and internationally.
Such basics are accomplished only by aggregative effort and reciprocity of the radiological population and related sciences, authorities, and staff of the journal.