ESL写作研究中书面反馈中引用的预测因子

IF 1.6 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/09737766.2020.1776651
William S. Pearson
{"title":"ESL写作研究中书面反馈中引用的预测因子","authors":"William S. Pearson","doi":"10.1080/09737766.2020.1776651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Getting cited is important for scholars in the burgeoning field of written feedback on English as a second language (ESL) writing. While much depends on the quality of the paper and the reputation of the author, there are a range of subjective factors that are known to impact on citation counts generally. The present study investigated the effects of 11 journal- and paper-based variables on the age-weighted citation rates (measured using data from Google Scholar) of a comprehensive body of 376 research articles on the topic of written feedback on ESL writing (spanning 1980-2018). It was found that the following factors positively predicted the citation rates of papers; a) the journal of publication, b) its publishing company, c) the journal's impact factor, d) inclusion on the Social Sciences or Emerging Sources Citation Indices and SCOPUS, e) subscription access to the journal, f) appearance in a specialist publication, g) paper length, and h) age of the article. The presence of keywords and title lengths were found to negatively correlate. The implications of the findings are discussed, and recommendations for future authors seeking to improve article citability are provided.","PeriodicalId":10501,"journal":{"name":"COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management","volume":"14 1","pages":"55 - 73"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09737766.2020.1776651","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of citations in written feedback on ESL writing research\",\"authors\":\"William S. Pearson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09737766.2020.1776651\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Getting cited is important for scholars in the burgeoning field of written feedback on English as a second language (ESL) writing. While much depends on the quality of the paper and the reputation of the author, there are a range of subjective factors that are known to impact on citation counts generally. The present study investigated the effects of 11 journal- and paper-based variables on the age-weighted citation rates (measured using data from Google Scholar) of a comprehensive body of 376 research articles on the topic of written feedback on ESL writing (spanning 1980-2018). It was found that the following factors positively predicted the citation rates of papers; a) the journal of publication, b) its publishing company, c) the journal's impact factor, d) inclusion on the Social Sciences or Emerging Sources Citation Indices and SCOPUS, e) subscription access to the journal, f) appearance in a specialist publication, g) paper length, and h) age of the article. The presence of keywords and title lengths were found to negatively correlate. The implications of the findings are discussed, and recommendations for future authors seeking to improve article citability are provided.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"55 - 73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09737766.2020.1776651\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2020.1776651\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2020.1776651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在以英语为第二语言(ESL)写作的书面反馈这一新兴领域,被引用对学者来说非常重要。虽然在很大程度上取决于论文的质量和作者的声誉,但有一系列主观因素通常会影响引用数。本研究调查了11个基于期刊和论文的变量对376篇关于ESL写作书面反馈主题的研究论文的年龄加权引用率(使用b谷歌Scholar的数据测量)的影响(从1980年到2018年)。研究发现,以下因素对论文被引率有正向预测作用;a)发表的期刊,b)出版公司,c)期刊的影响因子,d)社会科学或新兴资源引文索引和SCOPUS的收录,e)期刊的订阅访问,f)在专业出版物上的出现,g)论文长度,h)文章的年龄。关键词的存在与标题长度呈负相关。讨论了研究结果的意义,并为未来作者寻求提高文章可引性提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictors of citations in written feedback on ESL writing research
Getting cited is important for scholars in the burgeoning field of written feedback on English as a second language (ESL) writing. While much depends on the quality of the paper and the reputation of the author, there are a range of subjective factors that are known to impact on citation counts generally. The present study investigated the effects of 11 journal- and paper-based variables on the age-weighted citation rates (measured using data from Google Scholar) of a comprehensive body of 376 research articles on the topic of written feedback on ESL writing (spanning 1980-2018). It was found that the following factors positively predicted the citation rates of papers; a) the journal of publication, b) its publishing company, c) the journal's impact factor, d) inclusion on the Social Sciences or Emerging Sources Citation Indices and SCOPUS, e) subscription access to the journal, f) appearance in a specialist publication, g) paper length, and h) age of the article. The presence of keywords and title lengths were found to negatively correlate. The implications of the findings are discussed, and recommendations for future authors seeking to improve article citability are provided.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management
COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Mapping of top papers in the subject category of Soil Science Mapping global research on expert systems Research trends in the field of natural language processing : A scientometric study based on global publications during 2001-2020 Classic articles in cervical cancer research : A bibliometric analysis Human and algorithmic decision-making in the personnel selection process: A comparative bibliometric on bias
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1