从物理素养到共存的物理素养:问题是什么?

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH European Physical Education Review Pub Date : 2022-07-19 DOI:10.1177/1356336X221112867
Lisa Young, L. Alfrey, J. O’Connor
{"title":"从物理素养到共存的物理素养:问题是什么?","authors":"Lisa Young, L. Alfrey, J. O’Connor","doi":"10.1177/1356336X221112867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores how various ideological positions or ‘cosmoses’ associated with physical literacy (PL) have come to be and, in doing so, extends scholarship by examining and presenting PL as a multiplicity of physical literacies. Drawing on Stengers’ notion of ‘cosmopolitics’ and Venturini's ‘cartography of controversies’ method, 167 scholarly articles and 23 non-scholarly texts were analysed to observe and describe how PL has been framed over time as a result of dynamic political factors. Findings reveal that three ‘waves’ of PL cosmoses have unfolded over time (PL as health-promoting physical activity, PL as motor competence and PL as phenomenological embodiment). Whilst all three seek to promote engagement in physical activity and have loose ties to ‘health’, each PL cosmos is bound by different objectives, actors and obligations and is orientated towards solving a different problem. Rather than continued confusion and controversy, we propose that PL be understood as a multiverse wherein the three different PL cosmoses are held apart as physical literacies that play co-existing roles based on the problem that each cosmos is trying to solve. While understanding PL as a multiverse is not a solution to the controversy and uncertainty surrounding PL, it provides those who are interested in or tasked with enacting PL an opportunity to become aware of and understand what the different PL cosmoses or physical literacies constitute and thus make possible (or not) on the basis of their ontological differences.","PeriodicalId":47681,"journal":{"name":"European Physical Education Review","volume":"29 1","pages":"55 - 73"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moving from physical literacy to co-existing physical literacies: What is the problem?\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Young, L. Alfrey, J. O’Connor\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1356336X221112867\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper explores how various ideological positions or ‘cosmoses’ associated with physical literacy (PL) have come to be and, in doing so, extends scholarship by examining and presenting PL as a multiplicity of physical literacies. Drawing on Stengers’ notion of ‘cosmopolitics’ and Venturini's ‘cartography of controversies’ method, 167 scholarly articles and 23 non-scholarly texts were analysed to observe and describe how PL has been framed over time as a result of dynamic political factors. Findings reveal that three ‘waves’ of PL cosmoses have unfolded over time (PL as health-promoting physical activity, PL as motor competence and PL as phenomenological embodiment). Whilst all three seek to promote engagement in physical activity and have loose ties to ‘health’, each PL cosmos is bound by different objectives, actors and obligations and is orientated towards solving a different problem. Rather than continued confusion and controversy, we propose that PL be understood as a multiverse wherein the three different PL cosmoses are held apart as physical literacies that play co-existing roles based on the problem that each cosmos is trying to solve. While understanding PL as a multiverse is not a solution to the controversy and uncertainty surrounding PL, it provides those who are interested in or tasked with enacting PL an opportunity to become aware of and understand what the different PL cosmoses or physical literacies constitute and thus make possible (or not) on the basis of their ontological differences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Physical Education Review\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"55 - 73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Physical Education Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X221112867\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Physical Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X221112867","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文探讨了与物理素养(PL)相关的各种意识形态立场或“宇宙观”是如何形成的,并在这样做的过程中,通过将物理素养作为一种多样的物理素养进行考察和呈现来扩展学术。根据Stengers的“宇宙政治”概念和Venturini的“争议制图”方法,分析了167篇学术文章和23篇非学术文本,以观察和描述PL是如何随着时间的推移而被框定为动态政治因素的结果。研究结果表明,随着时间的推移,PL宇宙的三个“波”已经展开(PL是促进健康的身体活动,PL是运动能力,PL是现象学的体现)。虽然这三者都寻求促进身体活动,并与“健康”有着松散的联系,但每个PL宇宙都受到不同目标、参与者和义务的约束,并致力于解决不同的问题。与其继续混淆和争论,我们建议将PL理解为一个多元宇宙,其中三个不同的PL宇宙被视为基于每个宇宙试图解决的问题而共同发挥作用的物理文学。虽然将PL理解为多元宇宙并不能解决围绕PL的争议和不确定性,但它为那些对制定PL感兴趣或负责制定PL的人提供了一个机会,让他们意识到并理解不同的PL宇宙或物理文学构成了什么,从而在其本体论差异的基础上实现(或不实现)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Moving from physical literacy to co-existing physical literacies: What is the problem?
This paper explores how various ideological positions or ‘cosmoses’ associated with physical literacy (PL) have come to be and, in doing so, extends scholarship by examining and presenting PL as a multiplicity of physical literacies. Drawing on Stengers’ notion of ‘cosmopolitics’ and Venturini's ‘cartography of controversies’ method, 167 scholarly articles and 23 non-scholarly texts were analysed to observe and describe how PL has been framed over time as a result of dynamic political factors. Findings reveal that three ‘waves’ of PL cosmoses have unfolded over time (PL as health-promoting physical activity, PL as motor competence and PL as phenomenological embodiment). Whilst all three seek to promote engagement in physical activity and have loose ties to ‘health’, each PL cosmos is bound by different objectives, actors and obligations and is orientated towards solving a different problem. Rather than continued confusion and controversy, we propose that PL be understood as a multiverse wherein the three different PL cosmoses are held apart as physical literacies that play co-existing roles based on the problem that each cosmos is trying to solve. While understanding PL as a multiverse is not a solution to the controversy and uncertainty surrounding PL, it provides those who are interested in or tasked with enacting PL an opportunity to become aware of and understand what the different PL cosmoses or physical literacies constitute and thus make possible (or not) on the basis of their ontological differences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Physical Education Review
European Physical Education Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: - Multidisciplinary Approaches: European Physical Education Review brings together contributions from a wide range of disciplines across the natural and social sciences and humanities. It includes theoretical and research-based articles and occasionally devotes Special Issues to major topics and themes within the field. - International Coverage: European Physical Education Review publishes contributions from Europe and all regions of the world, promoting international communication among scholars and professionals.
期刊最新文献
Meaningful physical education: Towards an embodied pedagogy Pre-service teachers’ experiences of an activist approach in a health and physical education teacher education context What is the meaning of PE? Exploring the influence of an educational curriculum approach on students’ participation and non-participation in physical education How is observed (de)motivating teaching associated with student motivation and device-based physical activity during physical education? Understandings and enactments of social justice pedagogies in Swedish physical education and health practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1