比叶面积在超基性土壤上比在邻近的非超基性土壤上低

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2022-12-05 DOI:10.1080/17550874.2022.2160673
Thomas J. Samojedny, Claudia Garnica-Díaz, Dena L. Grossenbacher, G. Adamidis, P. Dimitrakopoulos, S. Siebert, M. Spasojevic, C. Hulshof, N. Rajakaruna
{"title":"比叶面积在超基性土壤上比在邻近的非超基性土壤上低","authors":"Thomas J. Samojedny, Claudia Garnica-Díaz, Dena L. Grossenbacher, G. Adamidis, P. Dimitrakopoulos, S. Siebert, M. Spasojevic, C. Hulshof, N. Rajakaruna","doi":"10.1080/17550874.2022.2160673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Specific leaf area (SLA) is a core trait within the leaf economic spectrum that describes differences in plant performance and productivity. Research on the sources of variation in the leaf economic spectrum and SLA has primarily focused on climate. Much less is known about SLA variation across unusual edaphic environments, such as on ultramafic soils. Aims To determine the role of ultramafic soils as a driver of SLA variation. Methods We measured SLA for dominant species on paired ultramafic and non-ultramafic soils in five biogeographically distinct regions around the globe and compared mean SLA values to globally reported values. Results SLA was lower on ultramafic than on non-ultramafic soils in all regions, except Puerto Rico, and both climate and soil were important drivers of SLA. For three of the five regions, SLA values on ultramafic soils were lower than the global average. Conclusions Soils can be a major driver of SLA along with climate. Low SLA on ultramafic soil points to selection for stress resistance strategies. Furthermore, in some bioregions, SLA values on ultramafic soils were among the lowest on the planet and thus represent globally rare phenotypes that should be conserved within these unique edaphic habitats.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Specific leaf area is lower on ultramafic than on neighbouring non-ultramafic soils\",\"authors\":\"Thomas J. Samojedny, Claudia Garnica-Díaz, Dena L. Grossenbacher, G. Adamidis, P. Dimitrakopoulos, S. Siebert, M. Spasojevic, C. Hulshof, N. Rajakaruna\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17550874.2022.2160673\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Background Specific leaf area (SLA) is a core trait within the leaf economic spectrum that describes differences in plant performance and productivity. Research on the sources of variation in the leaf economic spectrum and SLA has primarily focused on climate. Much less is known about SLA variation across unusual edaphic environments, such as on ultramafic soils. Aims To determine the role of ultramafic soils as a driver of SLA variation. Methods We measured SLA for dominant species on paired ultramafic and non-ultramafic soils in five biogeographically distinct regions around the globe and compared mean SLA values to globally reported values. Results SLA was lower on ultramafic than on non-ultramafic soils in all regions, except Puerto Rico, and both climate and soil were important drivers of SLA. For three of the five regions, SLA values on ultramafic soils were lower than the global average. Conclusions Soils can be a major driver of SLA along with climate. Low SLA on ultramafic soil points to selection for stress resistance strategies. Furthermore, in some bioregions, SLA values on ultramafic soils were among the lowest on the planet and thus represent globally rare phenotypes that should be conserved within these unique edaphic habitats.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2022.2160673\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2022.2160673","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

比叶面积(SLA)是叶片经济谱中描述植物性能和生产力差异的核心性状。对叶片经济谱和SLA变异源的研究主要集中在气候方面。在不同寻常的土壤环境中,例如在超镁质土壤中,人们对SLA的变化知之甚少。目的探讨超镁质土对土壤质量指数变化的驱动作用。方法测量了全球5个不同生物地理区域的超镁铁质和非超镁铁质配对土壤中优势物种的SLA,并将平均SLA值与全球报道值进行了比较。结果除波多黎各外,所有地区超镁质土壤的SLA都低于非超镁质土壤,气候和土壤都是SLA的重要驱动因素。5个地区中有3个地区的超镁质土壤的SLA值低于全球平均水平。结论土壤与气候一起可能是SLA的主要驱动因素。超塑性土的低SLA为抗应力策略的选择指明了方向。此外,在一些生物区域,超镁质土壤的SLA值是地球上最低的,因此代表了全球罕见的表型,应该在这些独特的土壤栖息地中得到保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Specific leaf area is lower on ultramafic than on neighbouring non-ultramafic soils
ABSTRACT Background Specific leaf area (SLA) is a core trait within the leaf economic spectrum that describes differences in plant performance and productivity. Research on the sources of variation in the leaf economic spectrum and SLA has primarily focused on climate. Much less is known about SLA variation across unusual edaphic environments, such as on ultramafic soils. Aims To determine the role of ultramafic soils as a driver of SLA variation. Methods We measured SLA for dominant species on paired ultramafic and non-ultramafic soils in five biogeographically distinct regions around the globe and compared mean SLA values to globally reported values. Results SLA was lower on ultramafic than on non-ultramafic soils in all regions, except Puerto Rico, and both climate and soil were important drivers of SLA. For three of the five regions, SLA values on ultramafic soils were lower than the global average. Conclusions Soils can be a major driver of SLA along with climate. Low SLA on ultramafic soil points to selection for stress resistance strategies. Furthermore, in some bioregions, SLA values on ultramafic soils were among the lowest on the planet and thus represent globally rare phenotypes that should be conserved within these unique edaphic habitats.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1