销形对搅拌摩擦焊铝拼焊板成形性能的影响:试验与有限元模拟分析

IF 0.8 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Transactions of The Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering Pub Date : 2022-04-13 DOI:10.1139/tcsme-2022-0031
N. M. Battina, C. Hari Krishna, Varaha Siva Prasad Vanthala
{"title":"销形对搅拌摩擦焊铝拼焊板成形性能的影响:试验与有限元模拟分析","authors":"N. M. Battina, C. Hari Krishna, Varaha Siva Prasad Vanthala","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2022-0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In sheet metal forming processes, the forming limit diagram is frequently employed as a criterion for predicting necking initiation. This is one of the most useful and effective methods for the evaluation of the formability of tailor welded blanks. The goal of this study was to determine the formability of friction stir welded (FSW) AA6061-T6 and AA2017-T6 by employing five dissimilar tool pin profiles. To evaluate the limiting dome height, five different combinations of dissimilar blanks were used in experimental and simulation experiments. Material characteristics such as density, elastic modulus, and all multi-linear behavior of blanks were manually assigned for simulation from the test results of true stress vs true strain plots. The punch with die supports was considered as a rigid body, whereas the metallic blanks were considered as plastic material. To carry out the simulation, the entire blank was divided into three zones. The results obtained from the experimental and simulation results show that the straight square tool pin profile is the optimal tool pin profile for the formability of FSW AA6061-T6 and AA2017-T6. The tested height values obtained from the limiting dome height are 20.5mm and 20.9 mm in experimentation and simulation respectively. The straight cylindrical tool pin profile exhibited the worst formability properties in both experimentation and simulation.","PeriodicalId":23285,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of The Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of pin profile on formability of friction stir welded aluminium tailor welded blanks: an experimental and finite element simulation analysis\",\"authors\":\"N. M. Battina, C. Hari Krishna, Varaha Siva Prasad Vanthala\",\"doi\":\"10.1139/tcsme-2022-0031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In sheet metal forming processes, the forming limit diagram is frequently employed as a criterion for predicting necking initiation. This is one of the most useful and effective methods for the evaluation of the formability of tailor welded blanks. The goal of this study was to determine the formability of friction stir welded (FSW) AA6061-T6 and AA2017-T6 by employing five dissimilar tool pin profiles. To evaluate the limiting dome height, five different combinations of dissimilar blanks were used in experimental and simulation experiments. Material characteristics such as density, elastic modulus, and all multi-linear behavior of blanks were manually assigned for simulation from the test results of true stress vs true strain plots. The punch with die supports was considered as a rigid body, whereas the metallic blanks were considered as plastic material. To carry out the simulation, the entire blank was divided into three zones. The results obtained from the experimental and simulation results show that the straight square tool pin profile is the optimal tool pin profile for the formability of FSW AA6061-T6 and AA2017-T6. The tested height values obtained from the limiting dome height are 20.5mm and 20.9 mm in experimentation and simulation respectively. The straight cylindrical tool pin profile exhibited the worst formability properties in both experimentation and simulation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions of The Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions of The Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1139/tcsme-2022-0031\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of The Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/tcsme-2022-0031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在板料成形过程中,成形极限图经常被用作预测颈缩起始的判据。这是评价拼焊板成形性最实用、最有效的方法之一。本研究的目的是通过采用五种不同的工具销轮廓来确定搅拌摩擦焊(FSW) AA6061-T6和AA2017-T6的成形性。为了评估极限穹顶高度,采用5种不同毛坯组合进行了试验和模拟试验。材料特性,如密度、弹性模量和坯料的所有多线性行为都是手动分配的,用于从真应力与真应变图的测试结果进行模拟。将带模具支撑的冲床视为刚体,而将金属毛坯视为塑性材料。为了进行仿真,将整个毛坯划分为三个区域。实验和仿真结果表明,直方型刀销轮廓是FSW AA6061-T6和AA2017-T6成形性能最优的刀销轮廓。由极限穹顶高度得到的测试高度在实验和模拟中分别为20.5mm和20.9 mm。实验和仿真结果表明,直圆柱型刀销的成形性能最差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influence of pin profile on formability of friction stir welded aluminium tailor welded blanks: an experimental and finite element simulation analysis
In sheet metal forming processes, the forming limit diagram is frequently employed as a criterion for predicting necking initiation. This is one of the most useful and effective methods for the evaluation of the formability of tailor welded blanks. The goal of this study was to determine the formability of friction stir welded (FSW) AA6061-T6 and AA2017-T6 by employing five dissimilar tool pin profiles. To evaluate the limiting dome height, five different combinations of dissimilar blanks were used in experimental and simulation experiments. Material characteristics such as density, elastic modulus, and all multi-linear behavior of blanks were manually assigned for simulation from the test results of true stress vs true strain plots. The punch with die supports was considered as a rigid body, whereas the metallic blanks were considered as plastic material. To carry out the simulation, the entire blank was divided into three zones. The results obtained from the experimental and simulation results show that the straight square tool pin profile is the optimal tool pin profile for the formability of FSW AA6061-T6 and AA2017-T6. The tested height values obtained from the limiting dome height are 20.5mm and 20.9 mm in experimentation and simulation respectively. The straight cylindrical tool pin profile exhibited the worst formability properties in both experimentation and simulation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1972, Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering is a quarterly journal that publishes comprehensive research articles and notes in the broad field of mechanical engineering. New advances in energy systems, biomechanics, engineering analysis and design, environmental engineering, materials technology, advanced manufacturing, mechatronics, MEMS, nanotechnology, thermo-fluids engineering, and transportation systems are featured.
期刊最新文献
Research on Optimal Fast Terminal Sliding Mode Control of Horizontal Vibration of High-speed Elevator Car System A Study on the Contact Quality Improvement of Fin to Tube Assemblies ERROR COMPENSATION OF A 2TPR&2TPS PARALLEL MECHANISM BASED ON PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION Trends in Research on Latent Heat Storage Using PCM, A Bibliometric Analysis Comparison of Flow and Loss Aspects in the Rotors of a Counter Rotating Turbine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1