性侵犯策略对加害者性别和受害者性别作用的探索性研究

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL International Journal of Sexual Health Pub Date : 2022-03-29 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1080/19317611.2022.2053027
Errin Fornicola, Zoë D Peterson
{"title":"性侵犯策略对加害者性别和受害者性别作用的探索性研究","authors":"Errin Fornicola, Zoë D Peterson","doi":"10.1080/19317611.2022.2053027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objectives:</i> This study sought to examine the association between perpetrator gender and victim gender and the use of sexually aggressive tactics (e.g., persistent enticement, verbal pressure, taking advantage of the inability to consent, and ignoring explicit non-consent). <i>Methods:</i> Participants were recruited from research panels to complete an online survey. They were asked to indicate which, if any, of 39 sexually aggressive tactics-representing four categories and nine subcategories-they had used to obtain sex, answering based on the gender with whom they most often have sex. Participants included 132 men who answered based on experiences with men (MSM), 131 men who answered based on experiences with women (MSW), 232 women who answered based on experiences with men (WSM), and 56 women who answered based on experiences with women (WSW). <i>Results:</i> MSM were more likely than all other groups to use enticement and more likely than WSM to engage in explicitly nonconsensual sex. WSM were more likely than MSW and WSW to take advantage of their partner's impaired ability to consent. There was no difference among groups in use of verbal pressure. <i>Conclusions:</i> Gendered sexual stereotypes may contribute to the types of tactics used by men and women against men and women.</p>","PeriodicalId":46855,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sexual Health","volume":"34 1","pages":"397-408"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10903606/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Exploratory Study of Sexual Aggression Tactics as a Function of Perpetrator Gender and Victim Gender.\",\"authors\":\"Errin Fornicola, Zoë D Peterson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19317611.2022.2053027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objectives:</i> This study sought to examine the association between perpetrator gender and victim gender and the use of sexually aggressive tactics (e.g., persistent enticement, verbal pressure, taking advantage of the inability to consent, and ignoring explicit non-consent). <i>Methods:</i> Participants were recruited from research panels to complete an online survey. They were asked to indicate which, if any, of 39 sexually aggressive tactics-representing four categories and nine subcategories-they had used to obtain sex, answering based on the gender with whom they most often have sex. Participants included 132 men who answered based on experiences with men (MSM), 131 men who answered based on experiences with women (MSW), 232 women who answered based on experiences with men (WSM), and 56 women who answered based on experiences with women (WSW). <i>Results:</i> MSM were more likely than all other groups to use enticement and more likely than WSM to engage in explicitly nonconsensual sex. WSM were more likely than MSW and WSW to take advantage of their partner's impaired ability to consent. There was no difference among groups in use of verbal pressure. <i>Conclusions:</i> Gendered sexual stereotypes may contribute to the types of tactics used by men and women against men and women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sexual Health\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"397-408\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10903606/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sexual Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2022.2053027\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sexual Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2022.2053027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要目的:本研究旨在探讨犯罪者性别和受害者性别与性侵犯策略(如持续引诱、语言压力、利用无法同意和忽视明确不同意)使用之间的关系。方法:从研究小组中招募参与者完成在线调查。他们被要求指出,如果有的话,在39种性侵犯策略(代表4个类别和9个小类别)中,他们曾使用过哪种策略来获得性行为,答案是基于他们最常与之发生性行为的性别。参与者包括132名男性根据与男性(MSM)的经验回答,131名男性根据与女性(MSW)的经验回答,232名女性根据与男性(WSM)的经验回答,56名女性根据与女性(WSW)的经验回答。结果:男男性接触者比其他所有群体更有可能使用引诱,比女男性接触者更有可能进行明确的非自愿性行为。女性男性比女性女性和女性女性更有可能利用伴侣的同意能力受损。在语言压力的使用上,各组之间没有差异。结论:性别刻板印象可能有助于男性和女性对男性和女性使用的策略类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Exploratory Study of Sexual Aggression Tactics as a Function of Perpetrator Gender and Victim Gender.

Objectives: This study sought to examine the association between perpetrator gender and victim gender and the use of sexually aggressive tactics (e.g., persistent enticement, verbal pressure, taking advantage of the inability to consent, and ignoring explicit non-consent). Methods: Participants were recruited from research panels to complete an online survey. They were asked to indicate which, if any, of 39 sexually aggressive tactics-representing four categories and nine subcategories-they had used to obtain sex, answering based on the gender with whom they most often have sex. Participants included 132 men who answered based on experiences with men (MSM), 131 men who answered based on experiences with women (MSW), 232 women who answered based on experiences with men (WSM), and 56 women who answered based on experiences with women (WSW). Results: MSM were more likely than all other groups to use enticement and more likely than WSM to engage in explicitly nonconsensual sex. WSM were more likely than MSW and WSW to take advantage of their partner's impaired ability to consent. There was no difference among groups in use of verbal pressure. Conclusions: Gendered sexual stereotypes may contribute to the types of tactics used by men and women against men and women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health, the International Journal of Sexual Health promotes sexual health as a state of physical, emotional, mental, and social well-being through a positive approach to sexuality and sexual rights. The journal publishes peer-reviewed scientific papers, editorials, and reviews, using quantitative and qualitative methods, descriptive and critical analysis, instrument development, surveys, and case studies to examine the essential elements of this broad concept. Leading experts from around the world present original work that covers a variety of disciplines, including sexology, biology, medicine, psychology, sociology, anthropology, history, and religion.
期刊最新文献
Discrimination, Heterosexism and Perceived Stress Among Young LGBT Tunisians: Unveiling the Moderation Effects of Self-Esteem Are Specific Sexual Activities During Partnered Sex and Masturbation Related to Sexual Problems in Men? Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy is Self-Reported as a Minimally Effective, and Sometimes Harmful, Treatment for Pudendal Neuralgia: A Cross-Sectional Study Changes in Individual and Dyadic Sexual Behavior Frequencies During Wartime in Israel: How Much, Who, and Why? Perspectives of Thai Transgender Adults on Diagnostic Criteria for Transsexualism, Gender Incongruence, and Gender Dysphoria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1