评估胎儿吸收剂量的计算机断层扫描检查孕妇:一个系统的回顾

A. Vodovatov, Olga A. Golchenko, I. Mashchenko, Darya V. Alekseeva, L. Chipiga, I. V. Khutornoy, P. V. Kozlova, G. E. Trufanov, P. S. Druzhinina, S. Ryzhov, I. V. Soldatov
{"title":"评估胎儿吸收剂量的计算机断层扫描检查孕妇:一个系统的回顾","authors":"A. Vodovatov, Olga A. Golchenko, I. Mashchenko, Darya V. Alekseeva, L. Chipiga, I. V. Khutornoy, P. V. Kozlova, G. E. Trufanov, P. S. Druzhinina, S. Ryzhov, I. V. Soldatov","doi":"10.17816/dd472150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Currently, no systematic data are available on fetal radiation exposure as a result of radiographic studies during pregnancy. Consequently, there are no approved methods of its calculation that can be used in clinical practice. It is especially relevant for computed tomography scans as it is a widely used and highly informative method of diagnostic imaging associated with high exposure levels. \nAIM: to systematize currently available data on radiation dose absorbed by the fetus from computed tomography scans in pregnant women. \nMATERIALS AND METHODS: The search for publications in Russian and English was conducted in PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar and еLibrary. The final analysis included 12 papers including 8 studies using human body phantoms, 3 retrospective studies and one prospective clinical study. \nRESULTS: Abdominal and pelvic computed tomography scans as well as whole-body scans were found to be associated with the highest fetal radiation exposure. However, in none of the publications the fetal exposure limit was exceeded. \nCONCLUSION: Clinically indicated non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans in pregnant women are not likely to be associated with the fetal absorbed doses that exceed the limit of 100 mGy regardless of the scanned area. However, this limit might be exceeded in case of performing multiple studies or if multiphase abdominal or pelvic computed tomography scans, or whole-body computed tomography scans are performed in patients with multiple trauma. In these cases, a decision regarding the need for these investigations should be made by a multi-disciplinary team (including radiation safety specialists, diagnostic radiologists and clinicians) based on the results of additional risk assessment.","PeriodicalId":34831,"journal":{"name":"Digital Diagnostics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of fetal absorbed doses from computed tomography examinations of pregnant patients: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"A. Vodovatov, Olga A. Golchenko, I. Mashchenko, Darya V. Alekseeva, L. Chipiga, I. V. Khutornoy, P. V. Kozlova, G. E. Trufanov, P. S. Druzhinina, S. Ryzhov, I. V. Soldatov\",\"doi\":\"10.17816/dd472150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: Currently, no systematic data are available on fetal radiation exposure as a result of radiographic studies during pregnancy. Consequently, there are no approved methods of its calculation that can be used in clinical practice. It is especially relevant for computed tomography scans as it is a widely used and highly informative method of diagnostic imaging associated with high exposure levels. \\nAIM: to systematize currently available data on radiation dose absorbed by the fetus from computed tomography scans in pregnant women. \\nMATERIALS AND METHODS: The search for publications in Russian and English was conducted in PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar and еLibrary. The final analysis included 12 papers including 8 studies using human body phantoms, 3 retrospective studies and one prospective clinical study. \\nRESULTS: Abdominal and pelvic computed tomography scans as well as whole-body scans were found to be associated with the highest fetal radiation exposure. However, in none of the publications the fetal exposure limit was exceeded. \\nCONCLUSION: Clinically indicated non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans in pregnant women are not likely to be associated with the fetal absorbed doses that exceed the limit of 100 mGy regardless of the scanned area. However, this limit might be exceeded in case of performing multiple studies or if multiphase abdominal or pelvic computed tomography scans, or whole-body computed tomography scans are performed in patients with multiple trauma. In these cases, a decision regarding the need for these investigations should be made by a multi-disciplinary team (including radiation safety specialists, diagnostic radiologists and clinicians) based on the results of additional risk assessment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digital Diagnostics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digital Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17816/dd472150\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/dd472150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前,由于妊娠期间的放射学研究,没有关于胎儿辐射暴露的系统数据。因此,没有可用于临床实践的经批准的计算方法。它与计算机断层扫描特别相关,因为它是一种广泛使用且信息量大的与高暴露水平相关的诊断成像方法。目的:系统化目前可获得的孕妇计算机断层扫描胎儿吸收辐射剂量的数据。材料和方法:在PubMed/Medline、Google Scholar和еLibrary中搜索俄语和英语出版物。最终分析包括12篇论文,包括8项使用人体模型的研究、3项回顾性研究和一项前瞻性临床研究。结果:腹部和骨盆计算机断层扫描以及全身扫描被发现与最高的胎儿辐射暴露有关。然而,没有一份出版物超过了胎儿暴露限值。结论:无论扫描区域如何,孕妇的非造影增强计算机断层扫描不太可能与超过100 mGy限制的胎儿吸收剂量有关。然而,在进行多项研究的情况下,或者如果对多发性创伤患者进行多期腹部或骨盆计算机断层扫描或全身计算机断层扫描,则可能会超过这一限制。在这些情况下,应由多学科团队(包括辐射安全专家、诊断放射科医生和临床医生)根据额外风险评估的结果,决定是否需要进行这些调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of fetal absorbed doses from computed tomography examinations of pregnant patients: A systematic review
BACKGROUND: Currently, no systematic data are available on fetal radiation exposure as a result of radiographic studies during pregnancy. Consequently, there are no approved methods of its calculation that can be used in clinical practice. It is especially relevant for computed tomography scans as it is a widely used and highly informative method of diagnostic imaging associated with high exposure levels. AIM: to systematize currently available data on radiation dose absorbed by the fetus from computed tomography scans in pregnant women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The search for publications in Russian and English was conducted in PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar and еLibrary. The final analysis included 12 papers including 8 studies using human body phantoms, 3 retrospective studies and one prospective clinical study. RESULTS: Abdominal and pelvic computed tomography scans as well as whole-body scans were found to be associated with the highest fetal radiation exposure. However, in none of the publications the fetal exposure limit was exceeded. CONCLUSION: Clinically indicated non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans in pregnant women are not likely to be associated with the fetal absorbed doses that exceed the limit of 100 mGy regardless of the scanned area. However, this limit might be exceeded in case of performing multiple studies or if multiphase abdominal or pelvic computed tomography scans, or whole-body computed tomography scans are performed in patients with multiple trauma. In these cases, a decision regarding the need for these investigations should be made by a multi-disciplinary team (including radiation safety specialists, diagnostic radiologists and clinicians) based on the results of additional risk assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
A new AI program for the automatic evaluation of scoliosis on frontal spinal radiographs: Accuracy, pros and cons. Conventional and innovative imaging modalities in Bladder Cancer: techniques and applications Possibilities and limitations of MRI diagnostics of endocervical adenocarcinomas of the cervix. An unknown situs viscerum inversus totalis, accidentally discovered after a CT scan The Role of Teleradiology in Interpretation of Ultrasounds Performed in the Emergency Setting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1