罗伯特·潘·沃伦及其持续的事实与观念分裂

IF 0.3 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE American Political Thought Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1086/719263
Douglas S. Van
{"title":"罗伯特·潘·沃伦及其持续的事实与观念分裂","authors":"Douglas S. Van","doi":"10.1086/719263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article I discuss the “terrible division of our age” in Robert Penn Warren’s novel All the King’s Men. I argue that a division between politics and ethics persists through the novel and through Warren’s larger body of work. This schism is meant to be fundamental to modernity, and Warren does not intend a resolution to it. I use his first book, John Brown: The Making of a Martyr, as a lens of analysis to show how his portrayal of John Brown anticipates characteristics of central characters that personify the terrible divide in his seminal publication. In doing so, I demonstrate that Warren forces our attention to an underlying logic of modernity.","PeriodicalId":41928,"journal":{"name":"American Political Thought","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robert Penn Warren and His Persistent Schism between Fact and Idea\",\"authors\":\"Douglas S. Van\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/719263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article I discuss the “terrible division of our age” in Robert Penn Warren’s novel All the King’s Men. I argue that a division between politics and ethics persists through the novel and through Warren’s larger body of work. This schism is meant to be fundamental to modernity, and Warren does not intend a resolution to it. I use his first book, John Brown: The Making of a Martyr, as a lens of analysis to show how his portrayal of John Brown anticipates characteristics of central characters that personify the terrible divide in his seminal publication. In doing so, I demonstrate that Warren forces our attention to an underlying logic of modernity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Political Thought\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Political Thought\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/719263\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Political Thought","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/719263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,我将讨论罗伯特·佩恩·沃伦的小说《所有国王的男人》中“我们这个时代的可怕分裂”。我认为,政治和道德之间的分歧贯穿于小说和沃伦的大部分作品中。这种分裂是现代性的根本,沃伦并不打算解决这个问题。我用他的第一本书《约翰·布朗:一个殉道者的形成》作为分析的镜头,来展示他对约翰·布朗的刻画是如何预见到在他的开创性出版物中体现可怕分歧的中心人物的特征的。在这样做的过程中,我证明了沃伦迫使我们注意到现代性的潜在逻辑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Robert Penn Warren and His Persistent Schism between Fact and Idea
In this article I discuss the “terrible division of our age” in Robert Penn Warren’s novel All the King’s Men. I argue that a division between politics and ethics persists through the novel and through Warren’s larger body of work. This schism is meant to be fundamental to modernity, and Warren does not intend a resolution to it. I use his first book, John Brown: The Making of a Martyr, as a lens of analysis to show how his portrayal of John Brown anticipates characteristics of central characters that personify the terrible divide in his seminal publication. In doing so, I demonstrate that Warren forces our attention to an underlying logic of modernity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Political Thought
American Political Thought POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊最新文献
:In Her Own Name: The Politics of Women’s Rights before Suffrage John Rawls’s Theology of Liberal Toleration Debating African American Political Thought :The Two Moralities: Conservatives, Liberals, and the Roots of Our Political Divide :The Cambridge Companion to “Democracy in America.”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1