{"title":"轻水反应堆核电站商品成本动因分析","authors":"Karen J. Dawson, P. Sabharwall","doi":"10.1504/ijnest.2020.10030866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Construction costs constitute the largest outlay of a nuclear power plant. Direct costs, such as the cost of materials and installation of materials and equipment, make up the majority of construction expenditures. The purpose of this study is to quantify the cost of the two most abundant materials: concrete and steel. This study shows that a 1% reduction in concrete installation rate results in a 0.6% reduction in concrete costs, and a 1% reduction in the steel installation rate creates a 0.3% reduction in steel costs. The additional cost paid for nuclear-quality concrete is shown to be 23% of total concrete budget. The additional cost paid for nuclear-quality steel is shown to be 41% of the total steel expenditures. These results show that focus on decreasing commodity expenditures (through increasing installation rate) can improve the cost of constructing nuclear power plants.","PeriodicalId":35144,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nuclear Energy Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Light water reactor nuclear power plant commodity cost driver analysis\",\"authors\":\"Karen J. Dawson, P. Sabharwall\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/ijnest.2020.10030866\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Construction costs constitute the largest outlay of a nuclear power plant. Direct costs, such as the cost of materials and installation of materials and equipment, make up the majority of construction expenditures. The purpose of this study is to quantify the cost of the two most abundant materials: concrete and steel. This study shows that a 1% reduction in concrete installation rate results in a 0.6% reduction in concrete costs, and a 1% reduction in the steel installation rate creates a 0.3% reduction in steel costs. The additional cost paid for nuclear-quality concrete is shown to be 23% of total concrete budget. The additional cost paid for nuclear-quality steel is shown to be 41% of the total steel expenditures. These results show that focus on decreasing commodity expenditures (through increasing installation rate) can improve the cost of constructing nuclear power plants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nuclear Energy Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nuclear Energy Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijnest.2020.10030866\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Energy\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nuclear Energy Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijnest.2020.10030866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Energy","Score":null,"Total":0}
Light water reactor nuclear power plant commodity cost driver analysis
Construction costs constitute the largest outlay of a nuclear power plant. Direct costs, such as the cost of materials and installation of materials and equipment, make up the majority of construction expenditures. The purpose of this study is to quantify the cost of the two most abundant materials: concrete and steel. This study shows that a 1% reduction in concrete installation rate results in a 0.6% reduction in concrete costs, and a 1% reduction in the steel installation rate creates a 0.3% reduction in steel costs. The additional cost paid for nuclear-quality concrete is shown to be 23% of total concrete budget. The additional cost paid for nuclear-quality steel is shown to be 41% of the total steel expenditures. These results show that focus on decreasing commodity expenditures (through increasing installation rate) can improve the cost of constructing nuclear power plants.
期刊介绍:
Today, nuclear reactors generate nearly one quarter of the electricity in nations representing two thirds of humanity, and other nuclear applications are integral to many aspects of the world economy. Nuclear fission remains an important option for meeting energy requirements and maintaining a balanced worldwide energy policy; with major countries expanding nuclear energy"s role and new countries poised to introduce it, the key issue is not whether the use of nuclear technology will grow worldwide, even if public opinion concerning safety, the economics of nuclear power, and waste disposal issues adversely affect the general acceptance of nuclear power, but whether it will grow fast enough to make a decisive contribution to the global imperative of sustainable development.