使业余爱好者合法化:为美国而教和埃德·克雷德的魅力

IF 0.3 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Berkeley Review of Education Pub Date : 2018-06-10 DOI:10.5070/B8BRE7232956
Davis Clement
{"title":"使业余爱好者合法化:为美国而教和埃德·克雷德的魅力","authors":"Davis Clement","doi":"10.5070/B8BRE7232956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): Clement, Davis | Abstract: Teach For America (TFA) corps members, in reflecting on their experiences, have described their motivations to join the program as idealistic, ambitious, and “profound drives to effect educational change” (Crawford-Garrett, 2012, p. 27) that eventually had to be reconciled with unexpected, harsh realities—both in their placement schools and in the TFA program itself. Matsui (2015) argues that popular culture is the source of this unrealistic idealism about teaching. This hero teacher narrative is a familiar theme in films such as Stand and Deliver, Dangerous Minds, and Freedom Writers, as well as in documentaries such as Waiting for Superman and The Lottery, some of which feature TFA teachers. TFA taps into this vein of popular idealism in its recruitment efforts. This post-intentional phenomenological study sought instances of the hero teacher narrative in the beliefs and motivations of TFA applicants and pre-service corps members—not as post-service reflections, as with many counternarratives, but in pre-service interviews, before conceptions of their initial intentions could be reconstructed by considering actual experiences. Findings suggest that TFA applicants may be pursuing ed cred, a unique conceptualization of legitimacy that blends the competence of professional mystique and the competitive hero teacher narrative with three new experiential variations: the drive for credibility, preference for convenience, and need for a credential. Implications for policy and leadership are discussed.","PeriodicalId":42751,"journal":{"name":"Berkeley Review of Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5070/B8BRE7232956","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legitimizing the Dilettante: Teach For America and the Allure of Ed Cred\",\"authors\":\"Davis Clement\",\"doi\":\"10.5070/B8BRE7232956\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Author(s): Clement, Davis | Abstract: Teach For America (TFA) corps members, in reflecting on their experiences, have described their motivations to join the program as idealistic, ambitious, and “profound drives to effect educational change” (Crawford-Garrett, 2012, p. 27) that eventually had to be reconciled with unexpected, harsh realities—both in their placement schools and in the TFA program itself. Matsui (2015) argues that popular culture is the source of this unrealistic idealism about teaching. This hero teacher narrative is a familiar theme in films such as Stand and Deliver, Dangerous Minds, and Freedom Writers, as well as in documentaries such as Waiting for Superman and The Lottery, some of which feature TFA teachers. TFA taps into this vein of popular idealism in its recruitment efforts. This post-intentional phenomenological study sought instances of the hero teacher narrative in the beliefs and motivations of TFA applicants and pre-service corps members—not as post-service reflections, as with many counternarratives, but in pre-service interviews, before conceptions of their initial intentions could be reconstructed by considering actual experiences. Findings suggest that TFA applicants may be pursuing ed cred, a unique conceptualization of legitimacy that blends the competence of professional mystique and the competitive hero teacher narrative with three new experiential variations: the drive for credibility, preference for convenience, and need for a credential. Implications for policy and leadership are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42751,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Berkeley Review of Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5070/B8BRE7232956\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Berkeley Review of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5070/B8BRE7232956\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkeley Review of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5070/B8BRE7232956","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要:“为美国而教”(Teach For America, TFA)团队成员在反思他们的经历时,将他们加入该计划的动机描述为理想主义的、雄心勃勃的,以及“影响教育变革的深刻动力”(Crawford-Garrett, 2012, p. 27),最终不得不与意想不到的、残酷的现实——无论是在他们的安置学校还是在TFA项目本身——达成和解。Matsui(2015)认为流行文化是这种不切实际的教学理想主义的来源。这种英雄教师叙事是电影《挺身而出》、《危险思想》、《自由作家》以及纪录片《等待超人》和《彩票》中常见的主题,其中一些以TFA教师为主角。TFA在招聘工作中利用了这种流行的理想主义。这项后意向现象学研究在TFA申请人和职前团队成员的信念和动机中寻找英雄教师叙事的实例——不是像许多反叙事那样作为职后反思,而是在职前访谈中,在考虑实际经历重建他们的最初意图概念之前。研究结果表明,TFA申请者可能正在追求学历,这是一种独特的合法性概念,它融合了专业神秘感和竞争英雄教师叙事的能力,以及三种新的经验变化:对可信度的驱动、对便利的偏好和对证书的需求。对政策和领导的影响进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Legitimizing the Dilettante: Teach For America and the Allure of Ed Cred
Author(s): Clement, Davis | Abstract: Teach For America (TFA) corps members, in reflecting on their experiences, have described their motivations to join the program as idealistic, ambitious, and “profound drives to effect educational change” (Crawford-Garrett, 2012, p. 27) that eventually had to be reconciled with unexpected, harsh realities—both in their placement schools and in the TFA program itself. Matsui (2015) argues that popular culture is the source of this unrealistic idealism about teaching. This hero teacher narrative is a familiar theme in films such as Stand and Deliver, Dangerous Minds, and Freedom Writers, as well as in documentaries such as Waiting for Superman and The Lottery, some of which feature TFA teachers. TFA taps into this vein of popular idealism in its recruitment efforts. This post-intentional phenomenological study sought instances of the hero teacher narrative in the beliefs and motivations of TFA applicants and pre-service corps members—not as post-service reflections, as with many counternarratives, but in pre-service interviews, before conceptions of their initial intentions could be reconstructed by considering actual experiences. Findings suggest that TFA applicants may be pursuing ed cred, a unique conceptualization of legitimacy that blends the competence of professional mystique and the competitive hero teacher narrative with three new experiential variations: the drive for credibility, preference for convenience, and need for a credential. Implications for policy and leadership are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Berkeley Review of Education
Berkeley Review of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Nice to Whom?: How Midwestern Niceness Undermines Educational Equity Racial Control and Student Labor From Youth Activism to Youth-Powered Curriculum You Matter: Empowering Youth Voices in Schools Can teacher protests reify what they protest?: Examining the rationalities of recent teacher activism through a Foucauldian analytics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1