剖宫产术后新生儿早期死亡的危险因素

E. Nkwabong, Manuella Frida Magnoui, F. Fouelifack Ymele
{"title":"剖宫产术后新生儿早期死亡的危险因素","authors":"E. Nkwabong, Manuella Frida Magnoui, F. Fouelifack Ymele","doi":"10.31579/2690-1919/202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To identify the risk factors for early neonatal death (NND) despite cesarean section (CS). Methods: This case-control study was carried out between 1st February and 31st May, 2019. Files of women whose newborns died within seven days following CS and those of women whose newborns were alive seven days after CS were examined. The main variables recorded included maternal age, educational level, gestational age at delivery, number of antenatal visits done, whether the woman was referred or not, intrapartum fever or hemorrhage, indication of CS, decision delivery interval, birthweight and sex of newborn. Data were analyzed using SPSS 21.0. Fisher exact test, t-test and logistic regression were used for comparison. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Our frequency of NND after CS was 4.8% (51/1053). Significant risk factors for NND after CS were birth weight <2000g (aOR 48.18, 95%CI 12.97-152.21), intra-partum hemorrhage (aOR 12.15, 95%CI 5.77-25.97), intra-partum fever (aOR 5.64, 95%CI 1.81-17.66), ˂4 antenatal visits (aOR 4.13, 95%CI 2.71-6.74), arrival ˃1h after referral (aOR 3.09, 95%CI 1.67-5.71) and primary school education level (aOR 2.39, 95%CI 1.16-4.92). Conclusion: From the risk factors identified above, we can recommend that women, especially those with primary school education level, should be counselled to attend at least four antenatal visits to allow the diagnosis and treatment of some diseases. Moreover, CS should be carried out as fast as possible in the cases of intrapartum hemorrhage. Women with intrapartum fever needs particular attention. Lastly, referral should be organized so that the woman arrives earlier.","PeriodicalId":93114,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical research and reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Factors for Early Neonatal Death despite Cesarean Section\",\"authors\":\"E. Nkwabong, Manuella Frida Magnoui, F. Fouelifack Ymele\",\"doi\":\"10.31579/2690-1919/202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To identify the risk factors for early neonatal death (NND) despite cesarean section (CS). Methods: This case-control study was carried out between 1st February and 31st May, 2019. Files of women whose newborns died within seven days following CS and those of women whose newborns were alive seven days after CS were examined. The main variables recorded included maternal age, educational level, gestational age at delivery, number of antenatal visits done, whether the woman was referred or not, intrapartum fever or hemorrhage, indication of CS, decision delivery interval, birthweight and sex of newborn. Data were analyzed using SPSS 21.0. Fisher exact test, t-test and logistic regression were used for comparison. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Our frequency of NND after CS was 4.8% (51/1053). Significant risk factors for NND after CS were birth weight <2000g (aOR 48.18, 95%CI 12.97-152.21), intra-partum hemorrhage (aOR 12.15, 95%CI 5.77-25.97), intra-partum fever (aOR 5.64, 95%CI 1.81-17.66), ˂4 antenatal visits (aOR 4.13, 95%CI 2.71-6.74), arrival ˃1h after referral (aOR 3.09, 95%CI 1.67-5.71) and primary school education level (aOR 2.39, 95%CI 1.16-4.92). Conclusion: From the risk factors identified above, we can recommend that women, especially those with primary school education level, should be counselled to attend at least four antenatal visits to allow the diagnosis and treatment of some diseases. Moreover, CS should be carried out as fast as possible in the cases of intrapartum hemorrhage. Women with intrapartum fever needs particular attention. Lastly, referral should be organized so that the woman arrives earlier.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical research and reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical research and reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1919/202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical research and reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1919/202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨剖宫产术后新生儿早期死亡的危险因素。方法:本病例对照研究于2019年2月1日至5月31日进行。对CS后7天内新生儿死亡的妇女和CS后7天后新生儿存活的妇女的档案进行了检查。记录的主要变量包括产妇年龄、教育水平、分娩时的胎龄、产前检查次数、是否转诊、产时发烧或出血、CS指征、决定分娩间隔、出生体重和新生儿性别。数据采用SPSS 21.0。采用Fisher精确检验、t检验和逻辑回归进行比较。P<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:CS后NND发生率为4.8%(51/1053)。CS后NND的显著危险因素是出生体重<2000g(aOR 48.18,95%CI 12.97-152.21)、产后出血(aOR 12.15,95%CI 5.77-25.97)、产后发烧(aOR 5.64,95%CI 1.81-17.66)、4次产前检查(aOR 4.13,95%CI 2.71-6.74),转诊后1h到达(aOR 3.09,95%CI 1.67-5.71)和小学教育水平(aOR 2.39,95%CI 1.16-4.92)。此外,在产时出血的情况下,应尽快进行CS。产时发热的妇女需要特别注意。最后,应组织转诊,以便妇女能更早到达。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk Factors for Early Neonatal Death despite Cesarean Section
Objective: To identify the risk factors for early neonatal death (NND) despite cesarean section (CS). Methods: This case-control study was carried out between 1st February and 31st May, 2019. Files of women whose newborns died within seven days following CS and those of women whose newborns were alive seven days after CS were examined. The main variables recorded included maternal age, educational level, gestational age at delivery, number of antenatal visits done, whether the woman was referred or not, intrapartum fever or hemorrhage, indication of CS, decision delivery interval, birthweight and sex of newborn. Data were analyzed using SPSS 21.0. Fisher exact test, t-test and logistic regression were used for comparison. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Our frequency of NND after CS was 4.8% (51/1053). Significant risk factors for NND after CS were birth weight <2000g (aOR 48.18, 95%CI 12.97-152.21), intra-partum hemorrhage (aOR 12.15, 95%CI 5.77-25.97), intra-partum fever (aOR 5.64, 95%CI 1.81-17.66), ˂4 antenatal visits (aOR 4.13, 95%CI 2.71-6.74), arrival ˃1h after referral (aOR 3.09, 95%CI 1.67-5.71) and primary school education level (aOR 2.39, 95%CI 1.16-4.92). Conclusion: From the risk factors identified above, we can recommend that women, especially those with primary school education level, should be counselled to attend at least four antenatal visits to allow the diagnosis and treatment of some diseases. Moreover, CS should be carried out as fast as possible in the cases of intrapartum hemorrhage. Women with intrapartum fever needs particular attention. Lastly, referral should be organized so that the woman arrives earlier.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ayurvedic Perspective of Yoga for Physical and Emotional Well-Being Hypoxia of the Brain and Mechanisms of its Development Cadmium Toxicity: Insight into Sources, Toxicokinetics, and Effect on Vital Organs and Embryos Paroxysmal Emotionality in a Group of Adolescents with Behavioral Disorders To Assess the Effect of Hospitalization on Adult Patients’ Mental Health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1