股票的低风险效应:来自较早时期行业数据的证据

IF 3.4 3区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Financial Analysts Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-31 DOI:10.1080/0015198X.2022.2158709
C. Conover, Joseph D. Farizo, Andrew C. Szakmary
{"title":"股票的低风险效应:来自较早时期行业数据的证据","authors":"C. Conover, Joseph D. Farizo, Andrew C. Szakmary","doi":"10.1080/0015198X.2022.2158709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Recently, there has been discussion of a “replication crisis” in Finance, where many empirical results in financial research are said not to be replicable. Previous research finds that low-risk stocks have higher returns than higher-risk stocks on a risk-adjusted basis. We reexamine the low-risk effect using a unique dataset for U.S. industries from 1871 to 1925. We confirm the presence of the effect for portfolios of U.S. industries, indicating that the low-risk effect is not due to data mining in previous studies. Comparing the results to that for more recent data, we find that the overall effect is at least as strong in the earlier data. Given that some market frictions were fewer in the earlier period, the results suggest that implicit trading costs, illiquidity, and/or behavioral biases may play an important role in the low-risk effect.","PeriodicalId":48062,"journal":{"name":"Financial Analysts Journal","volume":"79 1","pages":"98 - 119"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Low-Risk Effect in Equities: Evidence from Industry Data in an Earlier Time\",\"authors\":\"C. Conover, Joseph D. Farizo, Andrew C. Szakmary\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0015198X.2022.2158709\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Recently, there has been discussion of a “replication crisis” in Finance, where many empirical results in financial research are said not to be replicable. Previous research finds that low-risk stocks have higher returns than higher-risk stocks on a risk-adjusted basis. We reexamine the low-risk effect using a unique dataset for U.S. industries from 1871 to 1925. We confirm the presence of the effect for portfolios of U.S. industries, indicating that the low-risk effect is not due to data mining in previous studies. Comparing the results to that for more recent data, we find that the overall effect is at least as strong in the earlier data. Given that some market frictions were fewer in the earlier period, the results suggest that implicit trading costs, illiquidity, and/or behavioral biases may play an important role in the low-risk effect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Financial Analysts Journal\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"98 - 119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Financial Analysts Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198X.2022.2158709\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Analysts Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198X.2022.2158709","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要近年来,金融学界出现了“可复制危机”的讨论,许多金融研究的实证结果被认为是不可复制的。先前的研究发现,在风险调整的基础上,低风险股票比高风险股票有更高的回报。我们使用1871年至1925年美国工业的独特数据集重新检验了低风险效应。我们证实了美国行业投资组合效应的存在,表明在以往的研究中,低风险效应不是由于数据挖掘。将结果与最近的数据进行比较,我们发现总体效应至少与早期数据一样强。考虑到早期一些市场摩擦较少,结果表明,隐性交易成本、非流动性和/或行为偏差可能在低风险效应中发挥重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Low-Risk Effect in Equities: Evidence from Industry Data in an Earlier Time
Abstract Recently, there has been discussion of a “replication crisis” in Finance, where many empirical results in financial research are said not to be replicable. Previous research finds that low-risk stocks have higher returns than higher-risk stocks on a risk-adjusted basis. We reexamine the low-risk effect using a unique dataset for U.S. industries from 1871 to 1925. We confirm the presence of the effect for portfolios of U.S. industries, indicating that the low-risk effect is not due to data mining in previous studies. Comparing the results to that for more recent data, we find that the overall effect is at least as strong in the earlier data. Given that some market frictions were fewer in the earlier period, the results suggest that implicit trading costs, illiquidity, and/or behavioral biases may play an important role in the low-risk effect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Financial Analysts Journal
Financial Analysts Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Financial Analysts Journal aims to be the leading practitioner journal in the investment management community by advancing the knowledge and understanding of the practice of investment management through the publication of rigorous, peer-reviewed, practitioner-relevant research from leading academics and practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Choices Matter When Training Machine Learning Models for Return Prediction The Importance of Joining Lifecycle Models with Mean-Variance Optimization Transaction Costs and Capacity of Systematic Corporate Bond Strategies Predicting Corporate Bond Illiquidity via Machine Learning Nonlinear Factor Returns in the US Equity Market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1