聚合物驱——微观驱替效率重要吗?

IF 0.1 Q4 ENERGY & FUELS Fuentes el Reventon Energetico Pub Date : 2018-11-20 DOI:10.18273/REVFUE.V16N2-2018006
Guangyuan Sun, B. Crouse, D. Freed, R. Xu, Juan Bautista, Raoyang Zhang, H. Otomo, Yong Li, Hudong Chen, Hongli Fan, M. Dressler
{"title":"聚合物驱——微观驱替效率重要吗?","authors":"Guangyuan Sun, B. Crouse, D. Freed, R. Xu, Juan Bautista, Raoyang Zhang, H. Otomo, Yong Li, Hudong Chen, Hongli Fan, M. Dressler","doi":"10.18273/REVFUE.V16N2-2018006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Polymer flooding is an enhanced oil recovery (EOR) technique that aims to enhance the stability of the flood front in order to increase sweep efficiency and thereby increase hydrocarbon recovery. Polymer flooding studies often focus on large-scale sweep efficiency and neglect the impact of the pore-scale displacement efficiency of the multi-phase flow. This work explores the pore-scale behavior of water vs polymer flooding, and examines the impact of rock surface wettability on the microscopic displacement efficiency using digital rock physics. In this study, a micro-CT image of a sandstone rock sample was numerically simulated for both water and polymer flooding under oil-wet and water-wet conditions. All simulations were performed at a capillary number of 1E-5, corresponding to a capillary dominated flow regime. Results of the four two-phase flow imbibition simulations are analyzed with respect to displacement character, water phase break-through, viscous/capillary fingering, and trapped oil. In the water-wet scenario, differences between water flood and polymer flood are small, with the flood front giving a piston-like displacement and breakthrough occurring at about 0.4 pore volume (PV) for both types of injected fluid. On the other hand, for the oil-wet scenario, water flood and polymer flood show significant differences. In the water flood, fingering occurs and much of the oil is bypassed early on, whereas the polymer flood displaces more oil and thereby provides better microscopic sweep efficiency throughout the flood and especially around breakthrough. Overall the results for this rock sample indicate that water flood and polymer flood provide similar recovery for a water-wet condition, while the reduced mobility ratio of polymer flood gives significantly improved recovery for an oil-wet condition by avoiding the onset of microscopic (pore-scale) fingering that occurs in the water flood. This study suggests that depending on the rock-fluid conditions, the use of polymer can impact microscopic sweep efficiency, in addition to the well-known effect on macroscopic sweep behavior","PeriodicalId":41949,"journal":{"name":"Fuentes el Reventon Energetico","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Polymer flooding – Does Microscopic Displacement Efficiency Matter?\",\"authors\":\"Guangyuan Sun, B. Crouse, D. Freed, R. Xu, Juan Bautista, Raoyang Zhang, H. Otomo, Yong Li, Hudong Chen, Hongli Fan, M. Dressler\",\"doi\":\"10.18273/REVFUE.V16N2-2018006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Polymer flooding is an enhanced oil recovery (EOR) technique that aims to enhance the stability of the flood front in order to increase sweep efficiency and thereby increase hydrocarbon recovery. Polymer flooding studies often focus on large-scale sweep efficiency and neglect the impact of the pore-scale displacement efficiency of the multi-phase flow. This work explores the pore-scale behavior of water vs polymer flooding, and examines the impact of rock surface wettability on the microscopic displacement efficiency using digital rock physics. In this study, a micro-CT image of a sandstone rock sample was numerically simulated for both water and polymer flooding under oil-wet and water-wet conditions. All simulations were performed at a capillary number of 1E-5, corresponding to a capillary dominated flow regime. Results of the four two-phase flow imbibition simulations are analyzed with respect to displacement character, water phase break-through, viscous/capillary fingering, and trapped oil. In the water-wet scenario, differences between water flood and polymer flood are small, with the flood front giving a piston-like displacement and breakthrough occurring at about 0.4 pore volume (PV) for both types of injected fluid. On the other hand, for the oil-wet scenario, water flood and polymer flood show significant differences. In the water flood, fingering occurs and much of the oil is bypassed early on, whereas the polymer flood displaces more oil and thereby provides better microscopic sweep efficiency throughout the flood and especially around breakthrough. Overall the results for this rock sample indicate that water flood and polymer flood provide similar recovery for a water-wet condition, while the reduced mobility ratio of polymer flood gives significantly improved recovery for an oil-wet condition by avoiding the onset of microscopic (pore-scale) fingering that occurs in the water flood. This study suggests that depending on the rock-fluid conditions, the use of polymer can impact microscopic sweep efficiency, in addition to the well-known effect on macroscopic sweep behavior\",\"PeriodicalId\":41949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fuentes el Reventon Energetico\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fuentes el Reventon Energetico\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18273/REVFUE.V16N2-2018006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fuentes el Reventon Energetico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18273/REVFUE.V16N2-2018006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

聚合物驱是一种提高原油采收率(EOR)的技术,其目的是提高前缘的稳定性,从而提高波及效率,从而提高油气采收率。聚合物驱研究往往关注大尺度波及效率,而忽视了多相流孔隙尺度驱替效率的影响。这项工作探讨了水驱与聚合物驱的孔隙尺度行为,并利用数字岩石物理学研究了岩石表面润湿性对微观驱油效率的影响。在这项研究中,对砂岩样品在油湿和水湿条件下的水驱和聚合物驱的微ct图像进行了数值模拟。所有的模拟都是在毛细管数为1E-5的情况下进行的,对应于毛细管主导的流动状态。从驱替特征、水相突破、粘滞/毛细指动、困油等方面分析了四种两相流吸胀模拟的结果。在水湿情景下,水驱与聚合物驱的差异很小,两种注入流体的驱前都产生了类似活塞的驱替,并在0.4孔隙体积(PV)左右发生了突破。另一方面,对于油湿情景,水驱和聚合物驱表现出显著差异。在水驱过程中,会发生指动现象,大部分油在早期被绕过,而聚合物驱可以取代更多的油,从而在整个驱油过程中,特别是在突破段周围,提供更好的微观波及效率。总体而言,该岩石样品的结果表明,水驱和聚合物驱在水湿条件下的采收率相似,而聚合物驱的迁移率降低,通过避免水驱中发生的微观(孔隙尺度)指移,显著提高了油湿条件下的采收率。该研究表明,除了众所周知的对宏观波及行为的影响外,聚合物的使用还会影响微观波及效率,这取决于岩石流体条件
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Polymer flooding – Does Microscopic Displacement Efficiency Matter?
Polymer flooding is an enhanced oil recovery (EOR) technique that aims to enhance the stability of the flood front in order to increase sweep efficiency and thereby increase hydrocarbon recovery. Polymer flooding studies often focus on large-scale sweep efficiency and neglect the impact of the pore-scale displacement efficiency of the multi-phase flow. This work explores the pore-scale behavior of water vs polymer flooding, and examines the impact of rock surface wettability on the microscopic displacement efficiency using digital rock physics. In this study, a micro-CT image of a sandstone rock sample was numerically simulated for both water and polymer flooding under oil-wet and water-wet conditions. All simulations were performed at a capillary number of 1E-5, corresponding to a capillary dominated flow regime. Results of the four two-phase flow imbibition simulations are analyzed with respect to displacement character, water phase break-through, viscous/capillary fingering, and trapped oil. In the water-wet scenario, differences between water flood and polymer flood are small, with the flood front giving a piston-like displacement and breakthrough occurring at about 0.4 pore volume (PV) for both types of injected fluid. On the other hand, for the oil-wet scenario, water flood and polymer flood show significant differences. In the water flood, fingering occurs and much of the oil is bypassed early on, whereas the polymer flood displaces more oil and thereby provides better microscopic sweep efficiency throughout the flood and especially around breakthrough. Overall the results for this rock sample indicate that water flood and polymer flood provide similar recovery for a water-wet condition, while the reduced mobility ratio of polymer flood gives significantly improved recovery for an oil-wet condition by avoiding the onset of microscopic (pore-scale) fingering that occurs in the water flood. This study suggests that depending on the rock-fluid conditions, the use of polymer can impact microscopic sweep efficiency, in addition to the well-known effect on macroscopic sweep behavior
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
EVALUATION OF AN HPHT UNIT COUPLED WITH NIR PROBE TO DETERMINE ASPHALTENES PRECIPITATION ONSET UNDER DIFFERENT PRESSURES SISTEMAS FOTOVOLTAICOS EN SECTORES DEL ECUADOR CON DIFÍCIL ACCESO Y/O DESPROVISTOS DE SERVICIO ELÉCTRICO: UN ESTUDIO DESDE LAS EXPERIENCIAS LATINOAMERICANAS ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND SECONDARY RECOVERY: TWO MANAGEMENT OPTIONS FOR A MATURE FIELD IN ECUADOR LA TRANSICIÓN DESDE LA MIRADA DE UNA REVISTA VIABILIDADE DE IMPLEMENTAÇÃO DA ENERGIA MAREMOTRIZ EM PLATAFORMAS PETROLÍFERAS OFFSHORE NA BACIA DO FOZ DO AMAZONAS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1