绞刑架与各各他:17世纪贵格会墓地地名继承中的病态习俗

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Quaker Studies Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.3828/QUAKER.2021.26.1.5
Thomas J. Farrow
{"title":"绞刑架与各各他:17世纪贵格会墓地地名继承中的病态习俗","authors":"Thomas J. Farrow","doi":"10.3828/QUAKER.2021.26.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nIn the mid to late seventeenth century Quaker burial grounds were established throughout Britain on land donated by Friends or purchased specifically for the purpose. Among purchased sites, a small but consistent minority bear nominal association with gallows and gibbets through place-names inherited from prior land use. This suggests that a pattern of land acquisition relating to prior morbid use may be drawn. In the present work it is proposed that such undesirable land would not only have been cheap and convenient to acquire but that its connotation of liminality held further symbolic significance and purpose within early Quaker establishments. Two key case studies are provided and their conceptual significance investigated. Frameworks of enquiry are then theorised, culminating in suggestions for further research.","PeriodicalId":36790,"journal":{"name":"Quaker Studies","volume":"26 1","pages":"137-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gallows and Golgotha: Morbid Conventions in the Inherited Place-names of Seventeenth-century Quaker Burial Grounds\",\"authors\":\"Thomas J. Farrow\",\"doi\":\"10.3828/QUAKER.2021.26.1.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nIn the mid to late seventeenth century Quaker burial grounds were established throughout Britain on land donated by Friends or purchased specifically for the purpose. Among purchased sites, a small but consistent minority bear nominal association with gallows and gibbets through place-names inherited from prior land use. This suggests that a pattern of land acquisition relating to prior morbid use may be drawn. In the present work it is proposed that such undesirable land would not only have been cheap and convenient to acquire but that its connotation of liminality held further symbolic significance and purpose within early Quaker establishments. Two key case studies are provided and their conceptual significance investigated. Frameworks of enquiry are then theorised, culminating in suggestions for further research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quaker Studies\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"137-147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quaker Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3828/QUAKER.2021.26.1.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaker Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/QUAKER.2021.26.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

17世纪中后期,贵格会墓地在英国各地建立,由朋友捐赠或专门为此购买。在购买的场地中,一小部分但始终如一的少数人通过从以前的土地使用中继承的地名与绞刑架和长臂猿有着名义上的联系。这表明,可以绘制出与先前病态使用有关的土地征用模式。在目前的工作中,有人提出,这种不受欢迎的土地不仅价格低廉,获取方便,而且其边缘性的内涵在早期贵格会机构中具有进一步的象征意义和目的。提供了两个关键的案例研究,并探讨了它们的概念意义。然后对调查框架进行理论化,最终提出进一步研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gallows and Golgotha: Morbid Conventions in the Inherited Place-names of Seventeenth-century Quaker Burial Grounds
In the mid to late seventeenth century Quaker burial grounds were established throughout Britain on land donated by Friends or purchased specifically for the purpose. Among purchased sites, a small but consistent minority bear nominal association with gallows and gibbets through place-names inherited from prior land use. This suggests that a pattern of land acquisition relating to prior morbid use may be drawn. In the present work it is proposed that such undesirable land would not only have been cheap and convenient to acquire but that its connotation of liminality held further symbolic significance and purpose within early Quaker establishments. Two key case studies are provided and their conceptual significance investigated. Frameworks of enquiry are then theorised, culminating in suggestions for further research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quaker Studies
Quaker Studies Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
John Woolman’s Intersecting Testimonies against Enslavement, Colonialism and the Rum Trade John Woolman and ‘The Meek Shall Inherit the Earth’ Selecting from the Writings of John Woolman: ‘On Christian Moderation’ The Seed and the Day of Small Things: Finding Power and Powerlessness in Quaker Theology John Woolman Special Issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1