厌恶的时间分散:或者,通过直接视频恐怖重新认识类型

IF 2.4 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Television & New Media Pub Date : 2023-05-03 DOI:10.1177/15274764231171118
Caetlin Benson-Allott
{"title":"厌恶的时间分散:或者,通过直接视频恐怖重新认识类型","authors":"Caetlin Benson-Allott","doi":"10.1177/15274764231171118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many scholars have noted that the US video rental boom of the mid-1980s led to a surge in horror production, yet few acknowledge that these features were not in fact films. Direct-to-video (DTV) horror movies like Breeders–The Sexual Invasion and Video Violence were not made for and never received theatrical release, yet they were repeatedly pilloried as failed films. Dispensing with the preconception that DTV movies would or should follow the same genre norms as films, this essay argues that DTV horror movies demonstrate their creators’ exploration and creation of a new medium. The conventions of 1980s DTV horror are not the same as those of contemporaneous US horror films, and contrasting them shows how genre helped DTV creators develop the automatisms of videotape and how DTV horror can help scholars identify the norms and logic of contemporary on-demand culture.","PeriodicalId":51551,"journal":{"name":"Television & New Media","volume":"24 1","pages":"499 - 509"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal Dispersions of Disgust: Or, Reconceiving Genre Through Direct-to-Video Horror\",\"authors\":\"Caetlin Benson-Allott\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15274764231171118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many scholars have noted that the US video rental boom of the mid-1980s led to a surge in horror production, yet few acknowledge that these features were not in fact films. Direct-to-video (DTV) horror movies like Breeders–The Sexual Invasion and Video Violence were not made for and never received theatrical release, yet they were repeatedly pilloried as failed films. Dispensing with the preconception that DTV movies would or should follow the same genre norms as films, this essay argues that DTV horror movies demonstrate their creators’ exploration and creation of a new medium. The conventions of 1980s DTV horror are not the same as those of contemporaneous US horror films, and contrasting them shows how genre helped DTV creators develop the automatisms of videotape and how DTV horror can help scholars identify the norms and logic of contemporary on-demand culture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Television & New Media\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"499 - 509\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Television & New Media\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15274764231171118\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Television & New Media","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15274764231171118","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多学者指出,20世纪80年代中期美国视频租赁热潮导致了恐怖片制作的激增,但很少有人承认这些特征实际上不是电影。《繁殖者——性侵犯》和《视频暴力》等直接视频恐怖电影不是为之制作的,也从未在影院上映,但它们一再被嘲笑为失败的电影。本文摒弃了数字电视电影将或应该遵循与电影相同的类型规范的先入为主的观念,认为数字电视恐怖电影展示了创作者对新媒介的探索和创造。20世纪80年代数字电视恐怖片的惯例与同时代的美国恐怖片不同,对比它们可以看出类型如何帮助数字电视创作者发展录像带的自动化,以及数字电视恐怖如何帮助学者识别当代点播文化的规范和逻辑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Temporal Dispersions of Disgust: Or, Reconceiving Genre Through Direct-to-Video Horror
Many scholars have noted that the US video rental boom of the mid-1980s led to a surge in horror production, yet few acknowledge that these features were not in fact films. Direct-to-video (DTV) horror movies like Breeders–The Sexual Invasion and Video Violence were not made for and never received theatrical release, yet they were repeatedly pilloried as failed films. Dispensing with the preconception that DTV movies would or should follow the same genre norms as films, this essay argues that DTV horror movies demonstrate their creators’ exploration and creation of a new medium. The conventions of 1980s DTV horror are not the same as those of contemporaneous US horror films, and contrasting them shows how genre helped DTV creators develop the automatisms of videotape and how DTV horror can help scholars identify the norms and logic of contemporary on-demand culture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Television & New Media explores the field of television studies, focusing on audience ethnography, public policy, political economy, cultural history, and textual analysis. Special topics covered include digitalization, active audiences, cable and satellite issues, pedagogy, interdisciplinary matters, and globalization, as well as race, gender, and class issues.
期刊最新文献
Ideology as/of Platform Affordance and Black Feminist Conceptualizations of “Canceling”: Reading Twitter Calling out Feminists: Antifeminist Hijacking of Cancel Culture in South Korea The Platformisation of Cancel Culture “Alex, DO NOT BACKPEDAL ON SANDY HOOK!”: Reactionary Fandom, Cancel Culture, and the Possibility of ‘Audience Capture’ on YouTube Cancel Culture and Trigger-Ready Fragmented Interest Groups: The Case of Depp Versus Amber Heard
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1