“小心差距”:GSA在不断发展的全球社会中的作用(2017年GSA总统演讲)

Q1 Earth and Planetary Sciences GSA Today Pub Date : 2018-03-01 DOI:10.1130/GSAT17PRSADRS.1
I. Montañez
{"title":"“小心差距”:GSA在不断发展的全球社会中的作用(2017年GSA总统演讲)","authors":"I. Montañez","doi":"10.1130/GSAT17PRSADRS.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Geoscience is the integrator of the natural, physical, and mathematical sciences as our efforts increasingly span across a spectrum of disciplines. As such, we are the stewards of the Earth. Our science, whether basic or applied, has relevance to society. It provides the foundation and path forward for addressing everything from environmental and natural hazard issues to informing discussions on public health, climate change, and global security. And it provides the fundamental context for understanding humanity’s existence in the universe. Should it not follow then that the geosciences are a fundamental science— taught as part of a foundational curriculum in all schools in order to create an earth-literate public? The answer to this rhetorical question is clear. There continues to be broad public support for the nation’s scientific achievements, a trend that has been stable for the past few decades. Approximately 76% of Americans have at least a fair amount of confidence in scientists to act in the public interest (Pew Research Center, Oct. 2016), including an appreciation for the positive impact that science research has on the environment. And about the same number (~70%) think that government investment in basic science research pays off (Pew Research Center, 29 Jan. 2015). There is, however, substantial disparity between how the public and scientists perceive science-related issues and the contribution of scientific efforts to society. For example, the same study (Pew Research Center, 29 Jan. 2015) reveals the divide among the public regarding perceived consensus by scientists on fundamental topics such as the big bang theory, climate change, and evolution (Fig. 1A). The public is also largely pessimistic regarding the role geoscience research plays in guiding clean air, water, and land-use regulations. And despite the fact that nearly 60% of the public appreciates the impending resource limitation due to population growth, 4 in 10 remain confident that “the world will find a way to stretch its existing natural resources” (Fig. 1B). In this context, it is not hard to appreciate why we struggle to generate government and public support for the geoscience enterprise.","PeriodicalId":35784,"journal":{"name":"GSA Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Mind the Gap”: GSA’s Role in an Evolving Global Society (2017 GSA Presidential Address)\",\"authors\":\"I. Montañez\",\"doi\":\"10.1130/GSAT17PRSADRS.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Geoscience is the integrator of the natural, physical, and mathematical sciences as our efforts increasingly span across a spectrum of disciplines. As such, we are the stewards of the Earth. Our science, whether basic or applied, has relevance to society. It provides the foundation and path forward for addressing everything from environmental and natural hazard issues to informing discussions on public health, climate change, and global security. And it provides the fundamental context for understanding humanity’s existence in the universe. Should it not follow then that the geosciences are a fundamental science— taught as part of a foundational curriculum in all schools in order to create an earth-literate public? The answer to this rhetorical question is clear. There continues to be broad public support for the nation’s scientific achievements, a trend that has been stable for the past few decades. Approximately 76% of Americans have at least a fair amount of confidence in scientists to act in the public interest (Pew Research Center, Oct. 2016), including an appreciation for the positive impact that science research has on the environment. And about the same number (~70%) think that government investment in basic science research pays off (Pew Research Center, 29 Jan. 2015). There is, however, substantial disparity between how the public and scientists perceive science-related issues and the contribution of scientific efforts to society. For example, the same study (Pew Research Center, 29 Jan. 2015) reveals the divide among the public regarding perceived consensus by scientists on fundamental topics such as the big bang theory, climate change, and evolution (Fig. 1A). The public is also largely pessimistic regarding the role geoscience research plays in guiding clean air, water, and land-use regulations. And despite the fact that nearly 60% of the public appreciates the impending resource limitation due to population growth, 4 in 10 remain confident that “the world will find a way to stretch its existing natural resources” (Fig. 1B). In this context, it is not hard to appreciate why we struggle to generate government and public support for the geoscience enterprise.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GSA Today\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GSA Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1130/GSAT17PRSADRS.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GSA Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1130/GSAT17PRSADRS.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地球科学是自然科学、物理科学和数学科学的集成者,因为我们的努力越来越多地跨越了一系列学科。因此,我们是地球的管家。我们的科学,无论是基础的还是应用的,都与社会相关。它为解决从环境和自然灾害问题到公共卫生、气候变化和全球安全等各种问题提供了基础和前进道路。它为理解人类在宇宙中的存在提供了基本的背景。那么,地球科学不应该是一门基础科学——作为所有学校基础课程的一部分来教授,以培养对地球有认识的公众吗?这个反问句的答案很清楚。公众对国家的科学成就仍然有广泛的支持,这一趋势在过去几十年里一直很稳定。大约76%的美国人对科学家为公众利益行事至少有相当程度的信心(皮尤研究中心,2016年10月),包括对科学研究对环境的积极影响的赞赏。大约70%的人认为政府对基础科学研究的投资是有回报的(皮尤研究中心,2015年1月29日)。然而,在公众和科学家如何看待与科学有关的问题和科学努力对社会的贡献之间存在着巨大的差异。例如,同一项研究(皮尤研究中心,2015年1月29日)揭示了公众对科学家在大爆炸理论、气候变化和进化等基本问题上的共识的看法分歧(图1A)。公众对地球科学研究在指导清洁空气、水和土地使用法规方面所起的作用也普遍持悲观态度。尽管近60%的公众认识到人口增长导致的资源限制迫在眉睫,但十分之四的人仍然相信“世界将找到一种方法来扩展现有的自然资源”(图1B)。在这种背景下,不难理解为什么我们努力争取政府和公众对地球科学事业的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Mind the Gap”: GSA’s Role in an Evolving Global Society (2017 GSA Presidential Address)
Geoscience is the integrator of the natural, physical, and mathematical sciences as our efforts increasingly span across a spectrum of disciplines. As such, we are the stewards of the Earth. Our science, whether basic or applied, has relevance to society. It provides the foundation and path forward for addressing everything from environmental and natural hazard issues to informing discussions on public health, climate change, and global security. And it provides the fundamental context for understanding humanity’s existence in the universe. Should it not follow then that the geosciences are a fundamental science— taught as part of a foundational curriculum in all schools in order to create an earth-literate public? The answer to this rhetorical question is clear. There continues to be broad public support for the nation’s scientific achievements, a trend that has been stable for the past few decades. Approximately 76% of Americans have at least a fair amount of confidence in scientists to act in the public interest (Pew Research Center, Oct. 2016), including an appreciation for the positive impact that science research has on the environment. And about the same number (~70%) think that government investment in basic science research pays off (Pew Research Center, 29 Jan. 2015). There is, however, substantial disparity between how the public and scientists perceive science-related issues and the contribution of scientific efforts to society. For example, the same study (Pew Research Center, 29 Jan. 2015) reveals the divide among the public regarding perceived consensus by scientists on fundamental topics such as the big bang theory, climate change, and evolution (Fig. 1A). The public is also largely pessimistic regarding the role geoscience research plays in guiding clean air, water, and land-use regulations. And despite the fact that nearly 60% of the public appreciates the impending resource limitation due to population growth, 4 in 10 remain confident that “the world will find a way to stretch its existing natural resources” (Fig. 1B). In this context, it is not hard to appreciate why we struggle to generate government and public support for the geoscience enterprise.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
GSA Today
GSA Today Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geology
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Google Earth Engine Web Applications for Investigating and Teaching Fundamental Geoscience Concepts The Drakensberg Mountains: Southern Africa’s Barrier of Spears Retraversing the Highs and Lows of Cenozoic Sea Levels Facilitating the Critical Mineral Future: Valorization of Kaolin Mining Waste Through Partnerships Beast Quake (Taylor’s Version): Analysis of Seismic Signals Recorded during Two Taylor Swift Concerts in Seattle, July 2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1