加强precarity吗?对英国(苏格兰)教育和培训项目的批判性分析

IF 3.2 3区 管理学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Education and Training Pub Date : 2022-12-15 DOI:10.1108/et-03-2022-0122
L. Doyle, Geng Wang
{"title":"加强precarity吗?对英国(苏格兰)教育和培训项目的批判性分析","authors":"L. Doyle, Geng Wang","doi":"10.1108/et-03-2022-0122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe aim of this paper is to examine the provision of education and training programmes for young people in Scotland for work and lifelong learning within the context of the skills ecosystem approach adopted by the Scottish Government.Design/methodology/approachThe research drew upon findings from a large EU-funded multi-country project which ran from 2016 to 2019 that comprised experiences and perspectives with young people who were affected by these programmes as well as the managers and practitioners tasked with delivering them. The work was conducted in Aberdeenshire and Glasgow and included in-depth interviews with young people and programme managers and practitioners.FindingsThe research showed that there is a gap between the rhetoric of the intentions of the policies and how those involved at ground level experience the programmes enacted under policies which draw on a skill ecosystem approach. Whilst there was public funding for training, it was not clear from the enactment of the relevant policies where employers' responsibilities lie. Locating the findings in the skills ecosystem model highlights the weak engagement of employers in their pivotal role in the education and training system and the resulting increased precarity of the young people's futures.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper sheds light on the shape of education and training provision in Scotland, the range of participants engaged in the provision and the commitment of providers in comparison to policy language and intentions.Originality/valueThrough the skill ecosystem approach, this paper draws together policy narratives and the experiences of young people.","PeriodicalId":47994,"journal":{"name":"Education and Training","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strengthening precarity? A critical analysis of education and training programmes in the UK (Scotland)\",\"authors\":\"L. Doyle, Geng Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/et-03-2022-0122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThe aim of this paper is to examine the provision of education and training programmes for young people in Scotland for work and lifelong learning within the context of the skills ecosystem approach adopted by the Scottish Government.Design/methodology/approachThe research drew upon findings from a large EU-funded multi-country project which ran from 2016 to 2019 that comprised experiences and perspectives with young people who were affected by these programmes as well as the managers and practitioners tasked with delivering them. The work was conducted in Aberdeenshire and Glasgow and included in-depth interviews with young people and programme managers and practitioners.FindingsThe research showed that there is a gap between the rhetoric of the intentions of the policies and how those involved at ground level experience the programmes enacted under policies which draw on a skill ecosystem approach. Whilst there was public funding for training, it was not clear from the enactment of the relevant policies where employers' responsibilities lie. Locating the findings in the skills ecosystem model highlights the weak engagement of employers in their pivotal role in the education and training system and the resulting increased precarity of the young people's futures.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper sheds light on the shape of education and training provision in Scotland, the range of participants engaged in the provision and the commitment of providers in comparison to policy language and intentions.Originality/valueThrough the skill ecosystem approach, this paper draws together policy narratives and the experiences of young people.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education and Training\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education and Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/et-03-2022-0122\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/et-03-2022-0122","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是在苏格兰政府采用的技能生态系统方法的背景下,研究为苏格兰年轻人提供工作和终身学习的教育和培训计划。该研究借鉴了欧盟资助的一个大型多国项目的结果,该项目于2016年至2019年进行,包括受这些项目影响的年轻人以及负责实施这些项目的管理人员和从业者的经验和观点。这项工作是在阿伯丁郡和格拉斯哥进行的,包括对年轻人、项目经理和从业人员的深入采访。研究结果表明,政策意图的修辞与基层参与者如何体验利用技能生态系统方法的政策制定的计划之间存在差距。虽然有公共资金用于培训,但从相关政策的颁布来看,雇主的责任并不明确。将调查结果置于技能生态系统模型中,凸显了雇主在教育和培训系统中发挥关键作用的力度不够,从而增加了年轻人未来的不稳定性。研究的局限性/意义本文揭示了苏格兰教育和培训提供的形式,参与提供的参与者的范围和提供者的承诺,与政策语言和意图相比较。独创性/价值通过技能生态系统方法,本文将政策叙述和年轻人的经验结合在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Strengthening precarity? A critical analysis of education and training programmes in the UK (Scotland)
PurposeThe aim of this paper is to examine the provision of education and training programmes for young people in Scotland for work and lifelong learning within the context of the skills ecosystem approach adopted by the Scottish Government.Design/methodology/approachThe research drew upon findings from a large EU-funded multi-country project which ran from 2016 to 2019 that comprised experiences and perspectives with young people who were affected by these programmes as well as the managers and practitioners tasked with delivering them. The work was conducted in Aberdeenshire and Glasgow and included in-depth interviews with young people and programme managers and practitioners.FindingsThe research showed that there is a gap between the rhetoric of the intentions of the policies and how those involved at ground level experience the programmes enacted under policies which draw on a skill ecosystem approach. Whilst there was public funding for training, it was not clear from the enactment of the relevant policies where employers' responsibilities lie. Locating the findings in the skills ecosystem model highlights the weak engagement of employers in their pivotal role in the education and training system and the resulting increased precarity of the young people's futures.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper sheds light on the shape of education and training provision in Scotland, the range of participants engaged in the provision and the commitment of providers in comparison to policy language and intentions.Originality/valueThrough the skill ecosystem approach, this paper draws together policy narratives and the experiences of young people.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Education and Training
Education and Training EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.90%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Education + Training addresses the increasingly complex relationships between education, training and employment and the impact of these relationships on national and global labour markets. The journal gives specific consideration to young people, looking at how the transition from school/college to employment is achieved and how the nature of partnerships between the worlds of education and work continues to evolve. The journal explores vocationalism in learning and efforts to address employability within the curriculum, together with coverage of innovative themes and initiatives within vocational education and training. The journal is read by policy makers, educators and academics working in a wide range of fields including education, learning and skills development, enterprise and entrepreneurship education and training, induction and career development. Coverage: Managing the transition from school/college to work New initiatives in post 16 vocational education and training Education-Business partnerships and collaboration Links between education and industry The graduate labour market Work experience and placements The recruitment, induction and development of school leavers and graduates Young person employability and career development E learning in further and higher education Research news Reviews of recent publications.
期刊最新文献
Education and training for industry 4.0: a case study of a manufacturing ecosystem Block scheduling for LARC in a family medicine residency program Creating a Virtual Palliative Care Curriculum for Family Medicine Residents The Association between Residency Characteristics and Graduates Caring for Pregnant People: An FM-ROP Study Graduating Medical Students’ Knowledge Compared to Their Confidence in Treating Diabetes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1