{"title":"“矛盾同样真实的地方”","authors":"Jason Whittaker","doi":"10.7227/bjrl.98.1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the more detached and ironic view of Blake that emerged in\n the 1970s compared to appropriations of him in the 1960s, as evident in three\n science-fiction novels: Ray Nelson’s Blake’s\n Progress (1977), Angela Carter’s The Passion of New\n Eve (1977), and J. G. Ballard’s The Unlimited Dream\n Company (1979). In adopting a more antagonistic posture towards\n Blake, all three of these books reflect increasingly ambivalent attitudes\n towards the countercultures of the 1960s, and can be read as critical of some of\n those very energies that the Romantic movement was seen to embody. Thus Nelson\n rewrites the relationship of William and Catherine, in which the engraver comes\n under the influence of a diabolic Urizen, while Carter recasts the Prophet Los\n as a Charles Manson-esque figure. Even Ballard, the most benign of the three,\n views Blakean energy as a release of potentially dangerous psychopathologies. In\n all the novels, we see a contrarian use of misprision, rewriting Blake as Blake\n had rewritten Milton.","PeriodicalId":80816,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin. John Rylands University Library of Manchester","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘The Place Where Contrarieties are Equally True’\",\"authors\":\"Jason Whittaker\",\"doi\":\"10.7227/bjrl.98.1.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores the more detached and ironic view of Blake that emerged in\\n the 1970s compared to appropriations of him in the 1960s, as evident in three\\n science-fiction novels: Ray Nelson’s Blake’s\\n Progress (1977), Angela Carter’s The Passion of New\\n Eve (1977), and J. G. Ballard’s The Unlimited Dream\\n Company (1979). In adopting a more antagonistic posture towards\\n Blake, all three of these books reflect increasingly ambivalent attitudes\\n towards the countercultures of the 1960s, and can be read as critical of some of\\n those very energies that the Romantic movement was seen to embody. Thus Nelson\\n rewrites the relationship of William and Catherine, in which the engraver comes\\n under the influence of a diabolic Urizen, while Carter recasts the Prophet Los\\n as a Charles Manson-esque figure. Even Ballard, the most benign of the three,\\n views Blakean energy as a release of potentially dangerous psychopathologies. In\\n all the novels, we see a contrarian use of misprision, rewriting Blake as Blake\\n had rewritten Milton.\",\"PeriodicalId\":80816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin. John Rylands University Library of Manchester\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin. John Rylands University Library of Manchester\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7227/bjrl.98.1.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin. John Rylands University Library of Manchester","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7227/bjrl.98.1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This article explores the more detached and ironic view of Blake that emerged in
the 1970s compared to appropriations of him in the 1960s, as evident in three
science-fiction novels: Ray Nelson’s Blake’s
Progress (1977), Angela Carter’s The Passion of New
Eve (1977), and J. G. Ballard’s The Unlimited Dream
Company (1979). In adopting a more antagonistic posture towards
Blake, all three of these books reflect increasingly ambivalent attitudes
towards the countercultures of the 1960s, and can be read as critical of some of
those very energies that the Romantic movement was seen to embody. Thus Nelson
rewrites the relationship of William and Catherine, in which the engraver comes
under the influence of a diabolic Urizen, while Carter recasts the Prophet Los
as a Charles Manson-esque figure. Even Ballard, the most benign of the three,
views Blakean energy as a release of potentially dangerous psychopathologies. In
all the novels, we see a contrarian use of misprision, rewriting Blake as Blake
had rewritten Milton.