“矛盾同样真实的地方”

Jason Whittaker
{"title":"“矛盾同样真实的地方”","authors":"Jason Whittaker","doi":"10.7227/bjrl.98.1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the more detached and ironic view of Blake that emerged in\n the 1970s compared to appropriations of him in the 1960s, as evident in three\n science-fiction novels: Ray Nelson’s Blake’s\n Progress (1977), Angela Carter’s The Passion of New\n Eve (1977), and J. G. Ballard’s The Unlimited Dream\n Company (1979). In adopting a more antagonistic posture towards\n Blake, all three of these books reflect increasingly ambivalent attitudes\n towards the countercultures of the 1960s, and can be read as critical of some of\n those very energies that the Romantic movement was seen to embody. Thus Nelson\n rewrites the relationship of William and Catherine, in which the engraver comes\n under the influence of a diabolic Urizen, while Carter recasts the Prophet Los\n as a Charles Manson-esque figure. Even Ballard, the most benign of the three,\n views Blakean energy as a release of potentially dangerous psychopathologies. In\n all the novels, we see a contrarian use of misprision, rewriting Blake as Blake\n had rewritten Milton.","PeriodicalId":80816,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin. John Rylands University Library of Manchester","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘The Place Where Contrarieties are Equally True’\",\"authors\":\"Jason Whittaker\",\"doi\":\"10.7227/bjrl.98.1.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores the more detached and ironic view of Blake that emerged in\\n the 1970s compared to appropriations of him in the 1960s, as evident in three\\n science-fiction novels: Ray Nelson’s Blake’s\\n Progress (1977), Angela Carter’s The Passion of New\\n Eve (1977), and J. G. Ballard’s The Unlimited Dream\\n Company (1979). In adopting a more antagonistic posture towards\\n Blake, all three of these books reflect increasingly ambivalent attitudes\\n towards the countercultures of the 1960s, and can be read as critical of some of\\n those very energies that the Romantic movement was seen to embody. Thus Nelson\\n rewrites the relationship of William and Catherine, in which the engraver comes\\n under the influence of a diabolic Urizen, while Carter recasts the Prophet Los\\n as a Charles Manson-esque figure. Even Ballard, the most benign of the three,\\n views Blakean energy as a release of potentially dangerous psychopathologies. In\\n all the novels, we see a contrarian use of misprision, rewriting Blake as Blake\\n had rewritten Milton.\",\"PeriodicalId\":80816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin. John Rylands University Library of Manchester\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin. John Rylands University Library of Manchester\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7227/bjrl.98.1.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin. John Rylands University Library of Manchester","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7227/bjrl.98.1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章探讨了与20世纪60年代相比,20世纪70年代出现的对布莱克更为超然和讽刺的看法,这在三部科幻小说中都很明显:雷·纳尔逊的《布莱克的进步》(1977年)、安吉拉·卡特的《除夕的激情》(1977)和J·G·巴拉德的《无限的梦想公司》(1979年)。这三本书对布莱克采取了更为对立的态度,反映了对20世纪60年代反主流文化日益矛盾的态度,可以被解读为对浪漫主义运动所体现的一些能量的批评。因此,纳尔逊改写了威廉和凯瑟琳的关系,在这段关系中,雕刻师受到了恶魔般的乌里岑的影响,而卡特则将先知洛斯重塑为查尔斯·曼森式的人物。即使是三人中最温和的巴拉德,也将布莱克安的能量视为潜在危险精神病的释放。在所有的小说中,我们都看到了对误读的相反使用,就像布莱克重写米尔顿一样重写布莱克。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘The Place Where Contrarieties are Equally True’
This article explores the more detached and ironic view of Blake that emerged in the 1970s compared to appropriations of him in the 1960s, as evident in three science-fiction novels: Ray Nelson’s Blake’s Progress (1977), Angela Carter’s The Passion of New Eve (1977), and J. G. Ballard’s The Unlimited Dream Company (1979). In adopting a more antagonistic posture towards Blake, all three of these books reflect increasingly ambivalent attitudes towards the countercultures of the 1960s, and can be read as critical of some of those very energies that the Romantic movement was seen to embody. Thus Nelson rewrites the relationship of William and Catherine, in which the engraver comes under the influence of a diabolic Urizen, while Carter recasts the Prophet Los as a Charles Manson-esque figure. Even Ballard, the most benign of the three, views Blakean energy as a release of potentially dangerous psychopathologies. In all the novels, we see a contrarian use of misprision, rewriting Blake as Blake had rewritten Milton.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
David Lloyd Roberts (1834–1920), Physician and Gynaecologist Twenty-Three Ur III Texts from Detroit Institute of Arts The Mammal Thing Incunabula at the Manchester Grammar School Littifredi Corbizzi, Johann Anton Ramboux and an Album of Manuscript Cuttings at the John Rylands Library
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1