中国平台商业集团:硅谷模式的替代品?

IF 2.4 3区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Journal of Chinese Governance Pub Date : 2021-02-01 DOI:10.1080/23812346.2021.1877446
Kai Jia, M. Kenney
{"title":"中国平台商业集团:硅谷模式的替代品?","authors":"Kai Jia, M. Kenney","doi":"10.1080/23812346.2021.1877446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The current understanding of platform expansion is based upon the experience of US West Coast firms. China, with its largely protected but enormous internal market, provides an ideal ‘experiment’ for examining how platform business models might develop different evolutionary trajectories in different environments. Based upon a study of the two largest platform firms, Tencent and Alibaba, and the far smaller but dominant Chinese online travel agency platform, Trip.com, we demonstrate that a different business model has emerged in China. In contrast to the West Coast model—in which the expansion occurs through internal development and introduction, acquisition, and venture capital investment—Chinese firms have employed two other strategies. The first is listing some of their existing operations separately on the stock market (what we term a ‘sell off’) but not giving up control. The second strategy is interfirm cross investments. The use of these two strategies has led to the formation of an organizational form, that we term the ‘platform business group (PBG)’, which extends and transforms the existing Chinese business group model. We discuss the environmental conditions that enable PBGs to pursue business strategies in a different manner than their Western counterparts and to identify the key conditions that allowed the PBG model to develop. Our extension of platform studies to China enriches and extends theoretical and practical understanding of Chinese platforms. Finally, we discuss the difficulties that PBG firms face in employing their business model internationally.","PeriodicalId":45091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Governance","volume":"7 1","pages":"58 - 80"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23812346.2021.1877446","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Chinese platform business group: an alternative to the Silicon Valley model?\",\"authors\":\"Kai Jia, M. Kenney\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23812346.2021.1877446\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The current understanding of platform expansion is based upon the experience of US West Coast firms. China, with its largely protected but enormous internal market, provides an ideal ‘experiment’ for examining how platform business models might develop different evolutionary trajectories in different environments. Based upon a study of the two largest platform firms, Tencent and Alibaba, and the far smaller but dominant Chinese online travel agency platform, Trip.com, we demonstrate that a different business model has emerged in China. In contrast to the West Coast model—in which the expansion occurs through internal development and introduction, acquisition, and venture capital investment—Chinese firms have employed two other strategies. The first is listing some of their existing operations separately on the stock market (what we term a ‘sell off’) but not giving up control. The second strategy is interfirm cross investments. The use of these two strategies has led to the formation of an organizational form, that we term the ‘platform business group (PBG)’, which extends and transforms the existing Chinese business group model. We discuss the environmental conditions that enable PBGs to pursue business strategies in a different manner than their Western counterparts and to identify the key conditions that allowed the PBG model to develop. Our extension of platform studies to China enriches and extends theoretical and practical understanding of Chinese platforms. Finally, we discuss the difficulties that PBG firms face in employing their business model internationally.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chinese Governance\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"58 - 80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23812346.2021.1877446\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chinese Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2021.1877446\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chinese Governance","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2021.1877446","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

摘要目前对平台扩展的理解是基于美国西海岸公司的经验。中国拥有很大程度上受到保护但巨大的内部市场,为研究平台商业模式如何在不同环境中发展不同的进化轨迹提供了一个理想的“实验”。基于对腾讯和阿里巴巴这两家最大的平台公司以及规模小得多但占主导地位的中国在线旅行社平台Trip.com的研究,我们证明了中国已经出现了一种不同的商业模式。与西海岸模式不同的是,中国企业采用了另外两种策略。在西海岸模式中,扩张是通过内部开发和引进、收购和风险投资来实现的。第一种是在股票市场上单独列出他们现有的一些业务(我们称之为“出售”),但不放弃控制权。第二种策略是企业间交叉投资。这两种策略的使用导致了一种组织形式的形成,我们称之为“平台企业集团”,它扩展和改变了现有的中国企业集团模式。我们讨论了使PBG能够以不同于西方同行的方式追求商业战略的环境条件,并确定了允许PBG模式发展的关键条件。我们将平台研究扩展到中国,丰富和扩展了对中国平台的理论和实践理解。最后,我们讨论了PBG公司在国际上采用其商业模式时面临的困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Chinese platform business group: an alternative to the Silicon Valley model?
Abstract The current understanding of platform expansion is based upon the experience of US West Coast firms. China, with its largely protected but enormous internal market, provides an ideal ‘experiment’ for examining how platform business models might develop different evolutionary trajectories in different environments. Based upon a study of the two largest platform firms, Tencent and Alibaba, and the far smaller but dominant Chinese online travel agency platform, Trip.com, we demonstrate that a different business model has emerged in China. In contrast to the West Coast model—in which the expansion occurs through internal development and introduction, acquisition, and venture capital investment—Chinese firms have employed two other strategies. The first is listing some of their existing operations separately on the stock market (what we term a ‘sell off’) but not giving up control. The second strategy is interfirm cross investments. The use of these two strategies has led to the formation of an organizational form, that we term the ‘platform business group (PBG)’, which extends and transforms the existing Chinese business group model. We discuss the environmental conditions that enable PBGs to pursue business strategies in a different manner than their Western counterparts and to identify the key conditions that allowed the PBG model to develop. Our extension of platform studies to China enriches and extends theoretical and practical understanding of Chinese platforms. Finally, we discuss the difficulties that PBG firms face in employing their business model internationally.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Reconceptualizing policy change in China: from soft to harder forms of law in the household registration system reform Administrative states as moral hazards: four dimensions Party-led public participation in neighborhood governance: a comparative analysis of two forms of social networks Beyond state law: everyday rules and the fragile public Does china’s national carbon market function well? A perspective on effective market design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1