圣体禁食一年的反思

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION Liturgy Pub Date : 2021-07-03 DOI:10.1080/0458063X.2021.1951085
Stephanie Perdew
{"title":"圣体禁食一年的反思","authors":"Stephanie Perdew","doi":"10.1080/0458063X.2021.1951085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On Maundy Thursday 2021, I tasted the bread and cup of holy communion along with my congregants, for the first time since the First Sunday in Lent 2020. That was the day my local congregation of the United Church of Christ (UCC) last celebrated the sacrament of holy communion as the coronavirus was spreading across the globe and gaining a foothold in the United States. Beginning on the Third Sunday in Lent 2020, we responded to our governor’s mandate to shelter in place and closed our sanctuary doors. As we did so, we also decided that we would not celebrate holy communion in a virtual context. Even though we had the technological means to do so, our theological decision was not to celebrate holy communion in virtual space. This article is a pastoral and theological reflection on how one Protestant congregation in the Reformed tradition made the decision to enter a pandemic time of eucharistic fasting instead of celebrating communion online, and what the congregation and I as their pastor experienced spiritually during that time. It is not meant to suggest that all congregations should have made this choice, but it does offer insight into how it was discerned and why. This reflection offers a timeline of the decision-making and ensuing theological conversations and is undertaken with reference to several different denominational statements about the celebration of online communion. It refers as well to theological discussion during the time of pandemic in social media forums, on blogs, and in articles published in this journal. Finally, it raises further questions for reflection for those Protestants who did celebrate holy communion online during pandemic and for those who did not. In this journal we appreciate the connections between the parish and the academy, and the conversations between and among pastoral practitioners (practical theologians)—those writing from the academy, and those writing in the blogosphere. What pastors may be realizing after a year of pastoring in the pandemic in real time needs to be shared with those whose work it is to guide our theological reflection from the denominational offices and the academy. This is part of the work of reflective practice, and an inclusion of voices not always heard in theological conversation that is supposed to be about the local church.","PeriodicalId":53923,"journal":{"name":"Liturgy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reflections on a Year of Eucharistic Fasting\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Perdew\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0458063X.2021.1951085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On Maundy Thursday 2021, I tasted the bread and cup of holy communion along with my congregants, for the first time since the First Sunday in Lent 2020. That was the day my local congregation of the United Church of Christ (UCC) last celebrated the sacrament of holy communion as the coronavirus was spreading across the globe and gaining a foothold in the United States. Beginning on the Third Sunday in Lent 2020, we responded to our governor’s mandate to shelter in place and closed our sanctuary doors. As we did so, we also decided that we would not celebrate holy communion in a virtual context. Even though we had the technological means to do so, our theological decision was not to celebrate holy communion in virtual space. This article is a pastoral and theological reflection on how one Protestant congregation in the Reformed tradition made the decision to enter a pandemic time of eucharistic fasting instead of celebrating communion online, and what the congregation and I as their pastor experienced spiritually during that time. It is not meant to suggest that all congregations should have made this choice, but it does offer insight into how it was discerned and why. This reflection offers a timeline of the decision-making and ensuing theological conversations and is undertaken with reference to several different denominational statements about the celebration of online communion. It refers as well to theological discussion during the time of pandemic in social media forums, on blogs, and in articles published in this journal. Finally, it raises further questions for reflection for those Protestants who did celebrate holy communion online during pandemic and for those who did not. In this journal we appreciate the connections between the parish and the academy, and the conversations between and among pastoral practitioners (practical theologians)—those writing from the academy, and those writing in the blogosphere. What pastors may be realizing after a year of pastoring in the pandemic in real time needs to be shared with those whose work it is to guide our theological reflection from the denominational offices and the academy. This is part of the work of reflective practice, and an inclusion of voices not always heard in theological conversation that is supposed to be about the local church.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Liturgy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Liturgy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0458063X.2021.1951085\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liturgy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0458063X.2021.1951085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在2021年的濯足节星期四,我和会众一起品尝了面包和圣餐,这是自2020年四旬斋的第一个主日以来的第一次。那天是我们当地的联合基督教会(UCC)会众最后一次庆祝圣餐礼的日子,因为冠状病毒正在全球蔓延,并在美国站稳脚跟。从2020年四旬斋的第三个星期日开始,我们响应州长的命令,将避难所安置到位,关闭了避难所的大门。当我们这样做的时候,我们也决定我们不会在虚拟的环境中庆祝圣餐。尽管我们有技术手段这样做,但我们的神学决定不是在虚拟空间庆祝圣餐。这篇文章是对一个改革宗传统的新教会众如何决定进入圣餐禁食的大流行时期,而不是在网上庆祝圣餐,以及会众和我作为他们的牧师在那段时间里的精神经历的牧师和神学反思。这并不是说所有的教会都应该做出这样的选择,但它确实提供了关于如何辨别以及为什么要这样做的见解。这个反思提供了一个决策和随后的神学对话的时间表,并参考了几个不同教派关于庆祝在线共融的声明。它也指在疫情大流行期间,在社交媒体论坛、博客和本杂志发表的文章中出现的神学讨论。最后,它提出了进一步的问题,值得那些在大流行期间在网上庆祝圣餐的新教徒和那些没有庆祝圣餐的新教徒进行反思。在这本杂志中,我们欣赏教区和学院之间的联系,以及牧灵实践者(实践神学家)之间的对话——那些来自学院的写作,以及那些在博客世界中写作的人。牧师们在疫情中实时牧养了一年之后可能意识到的东西,需要与那些工作是指导我们从宗派办公室和学院进行神学反思的人分享。这是反思实践的一部分,包含了神学对话中不常听到的声音,这些声音应该是关于当地教会的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reflections on a Year of Eucharistic Fasting
On Maundy Thursday 2021, I tasted the bread and cup of holy communion along with my congregants, for the first time since the First Sunday in Lent 2020. That was the day my local congregation of the United Church of Christ (UCC) last celebrated the sacrament of holy communion as the coronavirus was spreading across the globe and gaining a foothold in the United States. Beginning on the Third Sunday in Lent 2020, we responded to our governor’s mandate to shelter in place and closed our sanctuary doors. As we did so, we also decided that we would not celebrate holy communion in a virtual context. Even though we had the technological means to do so, our theological decision was not to celebrate holy communion in virtual space. This article is a pastoral and theological reflection on how one Protestant congregation in the Reformed tradition made the decision to enter a pandemic time of eucharistic fasting instead of celebrating communion online, and what the congregation and I as their pastor experienced spiritually during that time. It is not meant to suggest that all congregations should have made this choice, but it does offer insight into how it was discerned and why. This reflection offers a timeline of the decision-making and ensuing theological conversations and is undertaken with reference to several different denominational statements about the celebration of online communion. It refers as well to theological discussion during the time of pandemic in social media forums, on blogs, and in articles published in this journal. Finally, it raises further questions for reflection for those Protestants who did celebrate holy communion online during pandemic and for those who did not. In this journal we appreciate the connections between the parish and the academy, and the conversations between and among pastoral practitioners (practical theologians)—those writing from the academy, and those writing in the blogosphere. What pastors may be realizing after a year of pastoring in the pandemic in real time needs to be shared with those whose work it is to guide our theological reflection from the denominational offices and the academy. This is part of the work of reflective practice, and an inclusion of voices not always heard in theological conversation that is supposed to be about the local church.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Liturgy
Liturgy RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Taizé: Brand or Anti-Brand? UnMute Yourself: Musings on the Obstacles of Worship’s Impact on Ethics When a Brand is Tainted: The Ethics of Song Selection in Corporate Worship “What Is Not Assumed Is Not Redeemed”: Worship Lifestyle Branding at Bethel Church UnMute Yourself: Surfing the Synthesis of the Academic and Pastoral
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1