变革性司法和恢复性司法:美国基于性别的暴力和另类司法观

IF 1.5 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY International Review of Victimology Pub Date : 2020-11-26 DOI:10.1177/0269758020970414
Mimi E. Kim
{"title":"变革性司法和恢复性司法:美国基于性别的暴力和另类司法观","authors":"Mimi E. Kim","doi":"10.1177/0269758020970414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the United States, the contemporary feminist movement against gender-based violence started in the early 1970s, just as ideologies and policies supporting mass criminalization launched what became a five-fold rise in U.S. rates of incarceration. Since the new millennium, people of color have taken the lead in re-envisioning fundamental notions of justice given the dramatic backdrop of mass incarceration and the recent upsurge in prison abolitionist possibilities. Central to this reformulation has been a social justice critique that recognizes the intersection of gender-based violence and other forms of interpersonal violence with the violence of the state, most concentrated within U.S. carceral institutions. While the U.S. roots of violence as well as resistance to this violence extend back to the earliest days of colonial occupation, the contemporary manifestation of the anti-violence struggle has taken on the labels of restorative justice and, more recently, transformative justice. This conceptual paper relies upon historical analysis of the contemporary anti-violence movement, secondary legal literature, and insider social movement knowledge to trace recent trends in the movement to redefine notions of justice in its application to gender-based violence, the contrasting trajectories of restorative justice and transformative justice, and the liberatory vision and practices of transformative justice.","PeriodicalId":45622,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Victimology","volume":"27 1","pages":"162 - 172"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0269758020970414","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transformative justice and restorative justice: Gender-based violence and alternative visions of justice in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Mimi E. Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0269758020970414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the United States, the contemporary feminist movement against gender-based violence started in the early 1970s, just as ideologies and policies supporting mass criminalization launched what became a five-fold rise in U.S. rates of incarceration. Since the new millennium, people of color have taken the lead in re-envisioning fundamental notions of justice given the dramatic backdrop of mass incarceration and the recent upsurge in prison abolitionist possibilities. Central to this reformulation has been a social justice critique that recognizes the intersection of gender-based violence and other forms of interpersonal violence with the violence of the state, most concentrated within U.S. carceral institutions. While the U.S. roots of violence as well as resistance to this violence extend back to the earliest days of colonial occupation, the contemporary manifestation of the anti-violence struggle has taken on the labels of restorative justice and, more recently, transformative justice. This conceptual paper relies upon historical analysis of the contemporary anti-violence movement, secondary legal literature, and insider social movement knowledge to trace recent trends in the movement to redefine notions of justice in its application to gender-based violence, the contrasting trajectories of restorative justice and transformative justice, and the liberatory vision and practices of transformative justice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Victimology\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"162 - 172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0269758020970414\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Victimology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0269758020970414\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Victimology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0269758020970414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

在美国,反对基于性别的暴力的当代女权主义运动始于20世纪70年代初,当时支持大规模刑事定罪的意识形态和政策使美国的监禁率上升了五倍。自新千年以来,鉴于大规模监禁的戏剧性背景和最近监狱废奴主义可能性的激增,有色人种率先重新设想了正义的基本概念。这一重新表述的核心是社会正义批判,它承认基于性别的暴力和其他形式的人际暴力与国家暴力的交叉点,最集中在美国的尸体机构中。虽然美国暴力的根源以及对这种暴力的抵抗可以追溯到殖民占领的早期,但反暴力斗争的当代表现形式已经被贴上了恢复性正义的标签,最近又被贴上变革性正义的帽子。这篇概念性论文基于对当代反暴力运动的历史分析、二级法律文献和内部社会运动知识,追踪了这场运动的最新趋势,以重新定义司法概念,将其应用于基于性别的暴力,恢复性司法和变革性司法的对比轨迹,以及变革性正义的解放性愿景和实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Transformative justice and restorative justice: Gender-based violence and alternative visions of justice in the United States
In the United States, the contemporary feminist movement against gender-based violence started in the early 1970s, just as ideologies and policies supporting mass criminalization launched what became a five-fold rise in U.S. rates of incarceration. Since the new millennium, people of color have taken the lead in re-envisioning fundamental notions of justice given the dramatic backdrop of mass incarceration and the recent upsurge in prison abolitionist possibilities. Central to this reformulation has been a social justice critique that recognizes the intersection of gender-based violence and other forms of interpersonal violence with the violence of the state, most concentrated within U.S. carceral institutions. While the U.S. roots of violence as well as resistance to this violence extend back to the earliest days of colonial occupation, the contemporary manifestation of the anti-violence struggle has taken on the labels of restorative justice and, more recently, transformative justice. This conceptual paper relies upon historical analysis of the contemporary anti-violence movement, secondary legal literature, and insider social movement knowledge to trace recent trends in the movement to redefine notions of justice in its application to gender-based violence, the contrasting trajectories of restorative justice and transformative justice, and the liberatory vision and practices of transformative justice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Review of Victimology
International Review of Victimology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
‘My trust in strangers has disappeared completely’: How hate crime, perceived risk, and the concealment of sexual orientation affect fear of crime among Swedish LGBTQ students ‘Doesn’t anyone care anymore?’ – Bystander intervention to hate crime The impact of top-down and bottom-up factors in shaping the status of the victim: A study of recent victim empowerment shifts in Slovenia From ecocide to ecocentrism: Conceptualising environmental victimhood at the International Criminal Court Virtual item trade scams: A typology of young victims
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1