废墟中的小说:托马斯·阿莫里的古董主义

IF 0.4 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE Eighteenth-Century Fiction Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.3138/ecf.34.s1.517
M. McGowan
{"title":"废墟中的小说:托马斯·阿莫里的古董主义","authors":"M. McGowan","doi":"10.3138/ecf.34.s1.517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This essay considers Thomas Amory’s Memoirs of the Lives of Several Ladies of Great Britain (1755) and The Life and Opinions of John Buncle, Esq. (1756) as experiments in the novel form. Amory’s novels flout many of the genre’s central conventions—like plot and character development—and instead present a deluge of facts, theories, and natural historical and antiquarian descriptions. I argue that these novels offer a peculiar sort of formal or fictional realism that attends not to particular people or places but to the general impressions of objects and ideas. In light of William Stukeley’s antiquarianism, which includes a model for what I label an “ecstatic epistemology” that affectively registers a general sense of the whole in excess of a ruin’s fragments, I read the formal peculiarities of Amory’s novels as a means for producing knowledge about the forms of ideas. By attaching feelings to these ideas—feelings that range from boredom to sublimity— Amory’s novels can give us the general sense of their form.","PeriodicalId":43800,"journal":{"name":"Eighteenth-Century Fiction","volume":"34 1","pages":"517 - 545"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Novel in Ruins: Thomas Amory’s Antiquarianism\",\"authors\":\"M. McGowan\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/ecf.34.s1.517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This essay considers Thomas Amory’s Memoirs of the Lives of Several Ladies of Great Britain (1755) and The Life and Opinions of John Buncle, Esq. (1756) as experiments in the novel form. Amory’s novels flout many of the genre’s central conventions—like plot and character development—and instead present a deluge of facts, theories, and natural historical and antiquarian descriptions. I argue that these novels offer a peculiar sort of formal or fictional realism that attends not to particular people or places but to the general impressions of objects and ideas. In light of William Stukeley’s antiquarianism, which includes a model for what I label an “ecstatic epistemology” that affectively registers a general sense of the whole in excess of a ruin’s fragments, I read the formal peculiarities of Amory’s novels as a means for producing knowledge about the forms of ideas. By attaching feelings to these ideas—feelings that range from boredom to sublimity— Amory’s novels can give us the general sense of their form.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eighteenth-Century Fiction\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"517 - 545\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eighteenth-Century Fiction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/ecf.34.s1.517\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eighteenth-Century Fiction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ecf.34.s1.517","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文考察了托马斯·阿莫里的《英国几位贵妇的生活回忆录》(1755)和《约翰·邦克尔先生的生活与见解》。(1756)作为小说形式的实验。Amory的小说藐视了许多这类小说的中心惯例,比如情节和人物发展,取而代之的是大量的事实、理论、自然历史和古物描述。我认为这些小说提供了一种特殊的形式或虚构的现实主义,不关注特定的人或地点,而是关注对象和思想的一般印象。根据威廉·斯图克利的古物研究,其中包括一个我称之为“狂喜认识论”的模型,它有效地记录了整体的一般意义,而不是废墟的碎片,我读了阿莫里小说的形式特点,作为一种产生关于思想形式的知识的手段。通过给这些想法附加情感——从无聊到崇高的情感——艾默里的小说可以让我们大致了解它们的形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Novel in Ruins: Thomas Amory’s Antiquarianism
Abstract:This essay considers Thomas Amory’s Memoirs of the Lives of Several Ladies of Great Britain (1755) and The Life and Opinions of John Buncle, Esq. (1756) as experiments in the novel form. Amory’s novels flout many of the genre’s central conventions—like plot and character development—and instead present a deluge of facts, theories, and natural historical and antiquarian descriptions. I argue that these novels offer a peculiar sort of formal or fictional realism that attends not to particular people or places but to the general impressions of objects and ideas. In light of William Stukeley’s antiquarianism, which includes a model for what I label an “ecstatic epistemology” that affectively registers a general sense of the whole in excess of a ruin’s fragments, I read the formal peculiarities of Amory’s novels as a means for producing knowledge about the forms of ideas. By attaching feelings to these ideas—feelings that range from boredom to sublimity— Amory’s novels can give us the general sense of their form.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊最新文献
Making the Marvelous: Marie-Catherine d’Aulnoy, Henriette-Julie de Murat, and the Literary Representation of the Decorative Arts by Rori Bloom Small Things in the Eighteenth Century: The Political and Personal Value of the Miniature, ed. Chloe Wigston Smith and Beth Fowkes Tobin Techno-Magism: Media, Mediation, and the Cut of Romanticism by Orrin N.C. Wang Refusing the Fictions of Unmarked Whiteness: Challenging Human Rank, Race, and History “Endeavouring” and Other Eighteenth-Century Fictions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1