学生参与调查的维度评估:对多维双因素模型的支持

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Revista De Psicodidactica Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.psicod.2020.02.001
Richard A. Inman , Paulo A.S. Moreira , Diana Cunha , Jorge Castro
{"title":"学生参与调查的维度评估:对多维双因素模型的支持","authors":"Richard A. Inman ,&nbsp;Paulo A.S. Moreira ,&nbsp;Diana Cunha ,&nbsp;Jorge Castro","doi":"10.1016/j.psicod.2020.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Student School Engagement Survey (SSES) is used to evaluate student engagement interventions run by the National Center for Student Engagement in the U.S. It was designed to measure the behavioral, emotional, and cognitive components of engagement, but its factorial structure has not been validated. To address this limitation, we tested the factorial structure of the Portuguese version of the SSES using a representative sample of 4866 adolescents. An exploratory factor analysis revealed five theoretically meaningful factors describing subtypes of emotional and behavioral engagement, and teacher support for learning. A confirmatory factor analysis supported modelling a shortened version of the SSES with a bifactor model. Bifactor indices indicated total SSES scores are interpretable as a measure of a single student engagement construct. Finally, as evidence of concurrent validity, the scale had a strong positive correlation with an established measure of student engagement. The proposed version of the SSES is a psychometrically adequate measure of student engagement, although cannot be said to measure cognitive engagement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46733,"journal":{"name":"Revista De Psicodidactica","volume":"25 2","pages":"Pages 109-118"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluación de la dimensionalidad del Student School Engagement Survey: apoyo para un modelo multidimensional bifactor\",\"authors\":\"Richard A. Inman ,&nbsp;Paulo A.S. Moreira ,&nbsp;Diana Cunha ,&nbsp;Jorge Castro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psicod.2020.02.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Student School Engagement Survey (SSES) is used to evaluate student engagement interventions run by the National Center for Student Engagement in the U.S. It was designed to measure the behavioral, emotional, and cognitive components of engagement, but its factorial structure has not been validated. To address this limitation, we tested the factorial structure of the Portuguese version of the SSES using a representative sample of 4866 adolescents. An exploratory factor analysis revealed five theoretically meaningful factors describing subtypes of emotional and behavioral engagement, and teacher support for learning. A confirmatory factor analysis supported modelling a shortened version of the SSES with a bifactor model. Bifactor indices indicated total SSES scores are interpretable as a measure of a single student engagement construct. Finally, as evidence of concurrent validity, the scale had a strong positive correlation with an established measure of student engagement. The proposed version of the SSES is a psychometrically adequate measure of student engagement, although cannot be said to measure cognitive engagement.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista De Psicodidactica\",\"volume\":\"25 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 109-118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista De Psicodidactica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1136103420300034\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista De Psicodidactica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1136103420300034","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

学生学校参与调查(ses)用于评估由美国国家学生参与中心运行的学生参与干预措施。它旨在测量参与的行为,情感和认知成分,但其析因结构尚未得到验证。为了解决这一限制,我们使用4866名青少年的代表性样本测试了葡萄牙语版ses的析因结构。探索性因素分析揭示了描述情感和行为投入亚型以及教师学习支持的五个理论上有意义的因素。验证性因子分析支持用双因子模型建模缩短版的社会经济体系。双因素指数表明,总ses分数可以解释为单个学生参与结构的衡量标准。最后,作为同时效度的证据,该量表与学生参与的既定衡量标准有很强的正相关。拟议版本的ses是一个心理计量学上充分衡量学生参与,虽然不能说衡量认知参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluación de la dimensionalidad del Student School Engagement Survey: apoyo para un modelo multidimensional bifactor

The Student School Engagement Survey (SSES) is used to evaluate student engagement interventions run by the National Center for Student Engagement in the U.S. It was designed to measure the behavioral, emotional, and cognitive components of engagement, but its factorial structure has not been validated. To address this limitation, we tested the factorial structure of the Portuguese version of the SSES using a representative sample of 4866 adolescents. An exploratory factor analysis revealed five theoretically meaningful factors describing subtypes of emotional and behavioral engagement, and teacher support for learning. A confirmatory factor analysis supported modelling a shortened version of the SSES with a bifactor model. Bifactor indices indicated total SSES scores are interpretable as a measure of a single student engagement construct. Finally, as evidence of concurrent validity, the scale had a strong positive correlation with an established measure of student engagement. The proposed version of the SSES is a psychometrically adequate measure of student engagement, although cannot be said to measure cognitive engagement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
18
审稿时长
35 days
期刊最新文献
Predicción de la intención docente del profesorado en formación inicial a partir del clima de (des-)empoderamiento creado por el formador del profesorado: un análisis longitudinal basado en la teoría de la autodeterminación Los descansos activos como herramienta para mejorar la atención en el contexto educativo. Una revisión sistemática y meta-análisis Observando lo inadvertido: la autoeficacia docente como mediador entre el contexto escolar y el agotamiento docente en regiones en desarrollo Eficacia de un programa de prevención multirriesgo en internet: Safety.net ¿La percepción de competencia y alfabetización motriz median la relación entre la competencia motriz y la práctica de actividad física?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1