局部区域治疗加索拉非尼治疗经动脉化疗栓塞难治的中期肝细胞癌患者的疗效

IF 0.3 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Advances in Digestive Medicine Pub Date : 2022-02-09 DOI:10.1002/aid2.13317
Tzu-Chun Hong, Hong-Ming Tsai, Yih-Jyh Lin, Chiung-Yu Chen, Chiao-Hsiung Chuang, I-Chin Wu, Ting-Tsung Chang, Meng-Zhi Han, Sheng-Hsiang Lin, Shang-Hung Chen, Hao-Chen Wang, Po-Jun Chen, Ming-Tsung Hsieh, Hsueh-Chien Chiang, Chieh-Yen Liu, Hsin-Yu Kuo
{"title":"局部区域治疗加索拉非尼治疗经动脉化疗栓塞难治的中期肝细胞癌患者的疗效","authors":"Tzu-Chun Hong,&nbsp;Hong-Ming Tsai,&nbsp;Yih-Jyh Lin,&nbsp;Chiung-Yu Chen,&nbsp;Chiao-Hsiung Chuang,&nbsp;I-Chin Wu,&nbsp;Ting-Tsung Chang,&nbsp;Meng-Zhi Han,&nbsp;Sheng-Hsiang Lin,&nbsp;Shang-Hung Chen,&nbsp;Hao-Chen Wang,&nbsp;Po-Jun Chen,&nbsp;Ming-Tsung Hsieh,&nbsp;Hsueh-Chien Chiang,&nbsp;Chieh-Yen Liu,&nbsp;Hsin-Yu Kuo","doi":"10.1002/aid2.13317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Sorafenib treatment is suggested for patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) refractory to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). This study aimed to study if combining local-regional treatment with sorafenib adds benefit to patients who had tumor progression after three sessions of TACE within 12 months. We retrospectively analyzed the treatment outcomes of sorafenib alone and combined treatment of sorafenib and local-regional therapies in intermediate-stage HCC patients after using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Forty-nine patients were enrolled; 28 patients were treated with sorafenib alone, whereas 21 patients received TACE or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in addition to sorafenib. After IPTW, the two groups were well-balanced for most baseline characteristics. The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were significantly higher in the sorafenib-combination group than the sorafenib-alone group (ORR: 41.3% vs 10.0%, <i>P</i> = .001; DCR: 44.6% vs 22.1%). The PFS was also significantly longer in the patients of the sorafenib-combination group than the alone group (median 5.3 vs 3.0 months, HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.35-0.88). The risk of extrahepatic metastases was significantly lower in the sorafenib-combination group (HR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01-0.50). The incidence of adverse events was comparable between sorafenib-combination and sorafenib-alone groups. Loco-regional therapy may be still able to exert additional survival benefit to patients taking sorafenib for TACE-refractory intermediate-stage HCC showing a better PFS and lower risk of extrahepatic metastases without causing significant liver dysfunction. Further investigations to identify patients who will be more likely to benefit from the combination of sorafenib with local-regional therapy are needed.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7278,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Digestive Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aid2.13317","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of local-regional treatment plus sorafenib in intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma patients refractory to transarterial chemoembolization\",\"authors\":\"Tzu-Chun Hong,&nbsp;Hong-Ming Tsai,&nbsp;Yih-Jyh Lin,&nbsp;Chiung-Yu Chen,&nbsp;Chiao-Hsiung Chuang,&nbsp;I-Chin Wu,&nbsp;Ting-Tsung Chang,&nbsp;Meng-Zhi Han,&nbsp;Sheng-Hsiang Lin,&nbsp;Shang-Hung Chen,&nbsp;Hao-Chen Wang,&nbsp;Po-Jun Chen,&nbsp;Ming-Tsung Hsieh,&nbsp;Hsueh-Chien Chiang,&nbsp;Chieh-Yen Liu,&nbsp;Hsin-Yu Kuo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aid2.13317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>Sorafenib treatment is suggested for patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) refractory to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). This study aimed to study if combining local-regional treatment with sorafenib adds benefit to patients who had tumor progression after three sessions of TACE within 12 months. We retrospectively analyzed the treatment outcomes of sorafenib alone and combined treatment of sorafenib and local-regional therapies in intermediate-stage HCC patients after using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Forty-nine patients were enrolled; 28 patients were treated with sorafenib alone, whereas 21 patients received TACE or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in addition to sorafenib. After IPTW, the two groups were well-balanced for most baseline characteristics. The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were significantly higher in the sorafenib-combination group than the sorafenib-alone group (ORR: 41.3% vs 10.0%, <i>P</i> = .001; DCR: 44.6% vs 22.1%). The PFS was also significantly longer in the patients of the sorafenib-combination group than the alone group (median 5.3 vs 3.0 months, HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.35-0.88). The risk of extrahepatic metastases was significantly lower in the sorafenib-combination group (HR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01-0.50). The incidence of adverse events was comparable between sorafenib-combination and sorafenib-alone groups. Loco-regional therapy may be still able to exert additional survival benefit to patients taking sorafenib for TACE-refractory intermediate-stage HCC showing a better PFS and lower risk of extrahepatic metastases without causing significant liver dysfunction. Further investigations to identify patients who will be more likely to benefit from the combination of sorafenib with local-regional therapy are needed.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Digestive Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aid2.13317\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Digestive Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aid2.13317\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Digestive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aid2.13317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

索拉非尼治疗建议用于经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)难治性中期肝细胞癌(HCC)患者。本研究旨在研究局部-局部联合索拉非尼治疗是否对在12个月内接受三次TACE治疗后肿瘤进展的患者有益。我们采用治疗加权逆概率(IPTW),回顾性分析索拉非尼单用和索拉非尼联合局部局部治疗对中期HCC患者的治疗结果。49例患者入组;28例患者单独接受索拉非尼治疗,而21例患者在接受索拉非尼治疗的同时接受TACE或射频消融(RFA)。IPTW后,两组在大多数基线特征上都达到了很好的平衡。索拉非尼联合治疗组的总缓解率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)显著高于索拉非尼单独治疗组(ORR: 41.3% vs 10.0%, P = .001;DCR: 44.6% vs 22.1%)。索拉非尼联合组患者的PFS也明显长于单用组(中位5.3个月vs 3.0个月,HR, 0.55;95% ci, 0.35‐0.88)。索拉非尼联合用药组肝外转移风险显著降低(HR, 0.04;95% ci, 0.01‐0.50)。索拉非尼联合组和索拉非尼单独组的不良事件发生率具有可比性。局部治疗可能仍然能够对服用索拉非尼治疗TACE难治性中期HCC的患者施加额外的生存益处,显示出更好的PFS和更低的肝外转移风险,而不会引起显著的肝功能障碍。需要进一步的研究来确定哪些患者更有可能从索拉非尼联合局部-区域治疗中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of local-regional treatment plus sorafenib in intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma patients refractory to transarterial chemoembolization

Sorafenib treatment is suggested for patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) refractory to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). This study aimed to study if combining local-regional treatment with sorafenib adds benefit to patients who had tumor progression after three sessions of TACE within 12 months. We retrospectively analyzed the treatment outcomes of sorafenib alone and combined treatment of sorafenib and local-regional therapies in intermediate-stage HCC patients after using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Forty-nine patients were enrolled; 28 patients were treated with sorafenib alone, whereas 21 patients received TACE or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in addition to sorafenib. After IPTW, the two groups were well-balanced for most baseline characteristics. The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were significantly higher in the sorafenib-combination group than the sorafenib-alone group (ORR: 41.3% vs 10.0%, P = .001; DCR: 44.6% vs 22.1%). The PFS was also significantly longer in the patients of the sorafenib-combination group than the alone group (median 5.3 vs 3.0 months, HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.35-0.88). The risk of extrahepatic metastases was significantly lower in the sorafenib-combination group (HR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01-0.50). The incidence of adverse events was comparable between sorafenib-combination and sorafenib-alone groups. Loco-regional therapy may be still able to exert additional survival benefit to patients taking sorafenib for TACE-refractory intermediate-stage HCC showing a better PFS and lower risk of extrahepatic metastases without causing significant liver dysfunction. Further investigations to identify patients who will be more likely to benefit from the combination of sorafenib with local-regional therapy are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Digestive Medicine
Advances in Digestive Medicine GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Advances in Digestive Medicine is the official peer-reviewed journal of GEST, DEST and TASL. Missions of AIDM are to enhance the quality of patient care, to promote researches in gastroenterology, endoscopy and hepatology related fields, and to develop platforms for digestive science. Specific areas of interest are included, but not limited to: • Acid-related disease • Small intestinal disease • Digestive cancer • Diagnostic & therapeutic endoscopy • Enteral nutrition • Innovation in endoscopic technology • Functional GI • Hepatitis • GI images • Liver cirrhosis • Gut hormone • NASH • Helicobacter pylori • Cancer screening • IBD • Laparoscopic surgery • Infectious disease of digestive tract • Genetics and metabolic disorder • Microbiota • Regenerative medicine • Pancreaticobiliary disease • Guideline & consensus.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The nursing roles in caring for patients with inflammatory bowel disease A comparative analysis of radiation exposure in endoscopic ultrasound‐guided drainage versus endoscopic transpapillary drainage for acute cholecystitis An unusual subepithelial tumor of gastritis cystica profunda Unusual gastric polyp
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1