马丁·路德的很多疾病我一直都是些不知名的恶魔

M. Stolberg, Tilmann Walter
{"title":"马丁·路德的很多疾病我一直都是些不知名的恶魔","authors":"M. Stolberg, Tilmann Walter","doi":"10.14315/arg-2018-1090105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article provides an edition of a medical consilium for Martin Luther by Matthäus Ratzenberger (1501–1559). So far overlooked by Luther’s biographers, it is the only known direct source for the therapeutic communication between the reformer and his personal physicians. In this article, Ratzenberger’s consilium is taken as a starting point for a discussion of the challenges and pitfalls of retrospective diagnosis. While some historians have rejected retrospective diagnosis in toto, the authors take a more nuanced position. They argue that, in Luther’s case, certain diagnoses – for instance, that he had kidneyor bladder-stones, gout or angina pectoris – are much more plausible and pro bable than others. The crucial and frequently underestimated problem, the authors argue, however, is that modern diagnostic terms do not do justice to the very different contemporary notions and experiences of the body and its diseases in early modern Europe. The authors illustrate this by a series of examples, mostly taken from Ratzen berger’s consilium and his account of Luther’s life and death. These range from the different understanding of syphilis and the reasons why contemporaries attributed 85. Jebisch, lies: Eibisch. Stolberg, Walter ARG_109_Inhalt_DD.indd 150 10.09.2018 12:49:35","PeriodicalId":42621,"journal":{"name":"ARCHIV FUR REFORMATIONSGESCHICHTE-ARCHIVE FOR REFORMATION HISTORY","volume":"109 1","pages":"126 - 151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.14315/arg-2018-1090105","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Martin Luthers viele Krankheiten. Ein unbekanntes Konsil von Matthäus Ratzenberger und die Problematik der retrospektiven Diagnose\",\"authors\":\"M. Stolberg, Tilmann Walter\",\"doi\":\"10.14315/arg-2018-1090105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article provides an edition of a medical consilium for Martin Luther by Matthäus Ratzenberger (1501–1559). So far overlooked by Luther’s biographers, it is the only known direct source for the therapeutic communication between the reformer and his personal physicians. In this article, Ratzenberger’s consilium is taken as a starting point for a discussion of the challenges and pitfalls of retrospective diagnosis. While some historians have rejected retrospective diagnosis in toto, the authors take a more nuanced position. They argue that, in Luther’s case, certain diagnoses – for instance, that he had kidneyor bladder-stones, gout or angina pectoris – are much more plausible and pro bable than others. The crucial and frequently underestimated problem, the authors argue, however, is that modern diagnostic terms do not do justice to the very different contemporary notions and experiences of the body and its diseases in early modern Europe. The authors illustrate this by a series of examples, mostly taken from Ratzen berger’s consilium and his account of Luther’s life and death. These range from the different understanding of syphilis and the reasons why contemporaries attributed 85. Jebisch, lies: Eibisch. Stolberg, Walter ARG_109_Inhalt_DD.indd 150 10.09.2018 12:49:35\",\"PeriodicalId\":42621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARCHIV FUR REFORMATIONSGESCHICHTE-ARCHIVE FOR REFORMATION HISTORY\",\"volume\":\"109 1\",\"pages\":\"126 - 151\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.14315/arg-2018-1090105\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARCHIV FUR REFORMATIONSGESCHICHTE-ARCHIVE FOR REFORMATION HISTORY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14315/arg-2018-1090105\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCHIV FUR REFORMATIONSGESCHICHTE-ARCHIVE FOR REFORMATION HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14315/arg-2018-1090105","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章提供了Matthäus Ratzenberger(1501-1559)为马丁·路德撰写的医学论文的一个版本。到目前为止,路德的传记作者忽视了这一点,它是改革者和他的私人医生之间治疗交流的唯一已知的直接来源。在这篇文章中,Ratzenberger的consilium被作为讨论回顾性诊断的挑战和陷阱的起点。虽然一些历史学家完全拒绝回顾性诊断,但作者的立场更为微妙。他们认为,在路德的案例中,某些诊断——例如,他患有肾脏或膀胱结石、痛风或心绞痛——比其他诊断更可信、更可能。然而,作者们认为,一个关键且经常被低估的问题是,现代诊断术语并不能公正地反映现代欧洲早期对身体及其疾病的截然不同的当代观念和经历。作者通过一系列的例子来说明这一点,这些例子大多取自Ratzen berger的著作和他对路德生死的描述。这些包括对梅毒的不同理解以及同时代人将其归因于85的原因。杰比施,谎言:艾比施。沃尔特·斯托尔贝格ARG_109_Inhart_DD.indd 150 2018年9月10日12:49:35
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Martin Luthers viele Krankheiten. Ein unbekanntes Konsil von Matthäus Ratzenberger und die Problematik der retrospektiven Diagnose
This article provides an edition of a medical consilium for Martin Luther by Matthäus Ratzenberger (1501–1559). So far overlooked by Luther’s biographers, it is the only known direct source for the therapeutic communication between the reformer and his personal physicians. In this article, Ratzenberger’s consilium is taken as a starting point for a discussion of the challenges and pitfalls of retrospective diagnosis. While some historians have rejected retrospective diagnosis in toto, the authors take a more nuanced position. They argue that, in Luther’s case, certain diagnoses – for instance, that he had kidneyor bladder-stones, gout or angina pectoris – are much more plausible and pro bable than others. The crucial and frequently underestimated problem, the authors argue, however, is that modern diagnostic terms do not do justice to the very different contemporary notions and experiences of the body and its diseases in early modern Europe. The authors illustrate this by a series of examples, mostly taken from Ratzen berger’s consilium and his account of Luther’s life and death. These range from the different understanding of syphilis and the reasons why contemporaries attributed 85. Jebisch, lies: Eibisch. Stolberg, Walter ARG_109_Inhalt_DD.indd 150 10.09.2018 12:49:35
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Medicine and Healing in Martin Luther’s Thought Die Vermessung der Arche Noah. Mosaische Physik im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert Historia Persecutionum Ecclesiae Bohemicae between History, Identity, and Martyrology Inhalt The Early Salvation Theology of Juan de Valdés: Luther Once Again
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1