埃塞俄比亚2019冠状病毒病预防的知识、态度和实践:系统综述和荟萃分析

Dinka Fikadu Gamtesa, H. Tola, Gadissa Gutema, Biniyam Dagne, Bira Bejiga Bedassa
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚2019冠状病毒病预防的知识、态度和实践:系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Dinka Fikadu Gamtesa, H. Tola, Gadissa Gutema, Biniyam Dagne, Bira Bejiga Bedassa","doi":"10.18502/jbe.v7i4.10392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Level of knowledge, Attitude and Practice (KAP) of the community towards corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is important to prevent and control the disease . In Ethiopia there are some studies that assess the KAP’s of different segments of the community and reported different results. However, there is limited review evidence that pooled the proportion of KAP of the community to wards COVID-19 prevention and control of the disease in Ethiopia. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize and pool the proportion of KAP towards COVID-19 prevention and control in general community. \nMethods: A systematic review and meta-analysis study was conducted to estimate the pooled proportion of Knowledge, Attitude and Practice towards COVID-19 prevention and control in general community. Electronic databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar and Science Direct were searched for studies reported in English language without restricting publication year. The search strategy was used by combining the keywords: “Knowledge”, “Attitude”, “Practice”, “COVID-19”, and “Ethiopia” both in Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) and free text terms. Data was analyzed using STATA version 14. Random effects model meta-analysis was employed to estimate pooled proportion of KAP’s towards COVID-19 in general community \nResults: Data on 12391 participants which retrived from 26 studies included into this review .The study was pooled to estimate the pooled proportion of knowledge, attitude and practice towards COVID-19 prevention and control in the community. Our meta-analysis revealed that the pooled proportion of good knowledge was 62% (95% CI: 54%-71%), while favorable attitude 64 %( 95% CI: 58%-71%) and prevention practice 44% (95% CI: 32%-56%). \nConclusion: Our review indicated that the knowledge, attitude and practice towards COVID-19 prevention and control in general community were considerably insufficient. There are several different factors that affects the level of practice towards COVID-19 prevention. Therefore, collaborative efforts should be made by the government, partners and the media to improve the knowledge,attitude and practice of the general community towards COVID-19 preventive practices.","PeriodicalId":34310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biostatistics and Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge, attitude and practice towards Coronavirus disease 2019 prevention in Ethiopia: Systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Dinka Fikadu Gamtesa, H. Tola, Gadissa Gutema, Biniyam Dagne, Bira Bejiga Bedassa\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/jbe.v7i4.10392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Level of knowledge, Attitude and Practice (KAP) of the community towards corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is important to prevent and control the disease . In Ethiopia there are some studies that assess the KAP’s of different segments of the community and reported different results. However, there is limited review evidence that pooled the proportion of KAP of the community to wards COVID-19 prevention and control of the disease in Ethiopia. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize and pool the proportion of KAP towards COVID-19 prevention and control in general community. \\nMethods: A systematic review and meta-analysis study was conducted to estimate the pooled proportion of Knowledge, Attitude and Practice towards COVID-19 prevention and control in general community. Electronic databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar and Science Direct were searched for studies reported in English language without restricting publication year. The search strategy was used by combining the keywords: “Knowledge”, “Attitude”, “Practice”, “COVID-19”, and “Ethiopia” both in Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) and free text terms. Data was analyzed using STATA version 14. Random effects model meta-analysis was employed to estimate pooled proportion of KAP’s towards COVID-19 in general community \\nResults: Data on 12391 participants which retrived from 26 studies included into this review .The study was pooled to estimate the pooled proportion of knowledge, attitude and practice towards COVID-19 prevention and control in the community. Our meta-analysis revealed that the pooled proportion of good knowledge was 62% (95% CI: 54%-71%), while favorable attitude 64 %( 95% CI: 58%-71%) and prevention practice 44% (95% CI: 32%-56%). \\nConclusion: Our review indicated that the knowledge, attitude and practice towards COVID-19 prevention and control in general community were considerably insufficient. There are several different factors that affects the level of practice towards COVID-19 prevention. Therefore, collaborative efforts should be made by the government, partners and the media to improve the knowledge,attitude and practice of the general community towards COVID-19 preventive practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biostatistics and Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biostatistics and Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/jbe.v7i4.10392\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biostatistics and Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jbe.v7i4.10392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:社区对2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)的知识、态度和实践水平(KAP)对于预防和控制该疾病至关重要。在埃塞俄比亚,有一些研究评估了社区不同阶层的KAP,并报告了不同的结果。然而,有限的审查证据表明,将埃塞俄比亚社区KAP与新冠肺炎预防和控制病房的比例汇总在一起。本系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是总结和汇总KAP在普通社区新冠肺炎预防和控制中的比例。方法:通过系统回顾和元分析研究,估计普通社区对新冠肺炎防控的知识、态度和实践的汇总比例。在PubMed、Google Scholar和Science Direct等电子数据库中搜索以英语报告的研究,但不限制发表年份。搜索策略是通过结合医学主题标题(MeSH)和自由文本术语中的关键词:“知识”、“态度”、“实践”、“新冠肺炎”和“埃塞俄比亚”来使用的。使用STATA版本14对数据进行分析。采用随机效应模型荟萃分析来估计一般社区中KAP对新冠肺炎的汇总比例。结果:从纳入本综述的26项研究中检索的12391名参与者的数据。该研究被汇总以估计社区中对新冠肺炎预防和控制的知识、态度和实践的汇总比例。我们的荟萃分析显示,良好知识的综合比例为62%(95%CI:54%-71%),而良好态度的综合比例是64%(95%CI:58%-71%)和预防实践的综合比例则是44%(95%CI:32%-56%)。结论:社区对新冠肺炎防控的认识、态度和实践存在较大不足。有几个不同的因素影响新冠肺炎预防实践的水平。因此,政府、合作伙伴和媒体应共同努力,提高公众对新冠肺炎预防措施的认识、态度和实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Knowledge, attitude and practice towards Coronavirus disease 2019 prevention in Ethiopia: Systematic review and meta-analysis
Introduction: Level of knowledge, Attitude and Practice (KAP) of the community towards corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is important to prevent and control the disease . In Ethiopia there are some studies that assess the KAP’s of different segments of the community and reported different results. However, there is limited review evidence that pooled the proportion of KAP of the community to wards COVID-19 prevention and control of the disease in Ethiopia. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize and pool the proportion of KAP towards COVID-19 prevention and control in general community. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis study was conducted to estimate the pooled proportion of Knowledge, Attitude and Practice towards COVID-19 prevention and control in general community. Electronic databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar and Science Direct were searched for studies reported in English language without restricting publication year. The search strategy was used by combining the keywords: “Knowledge”, “Attitude”, “Practice”, “COVID-19”, and “Ethiopia” both in Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) and free text terms. Data was analyzed using STATA version 14. Random effects model meta-analysis was employed to estimate pooled proportion of KAP’s towards COVID-19 in general community Results: Data on 12391 participants which retrived from 26 studies included into this review .The study was pooled to estimate the pooled proportion of knowledge, attitude and practice towards COVID-19 prevention and control in the community. Our meta-analysis revealed that the pooled proportion of good knowledge was 62% (95% CI: 54%-71%), while favorable attitude 64 %( 95% CI: 58%-71%) and prevention practice 44% (95% CI: 32%-56%). Conclusion: Our review indicated that the knowledge, attitude and practice towards COVID-19 prevention and control in general community were considerably insufficient. There are several different factors that affects the level of practice towards COVID-19 prevention. Therefore, collaborative efforts should be made by the government, partners and the media to improve the knowledge,attitude and practice of the general community towards COVID-19 preventive practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Copula Frailty defective models in presence of Cure Fraction The Pattern of Motorcyclists' Death Due to Accidents and a Three-year Forecast in East Azerbaijan Province, Iran: A Time Series Study Factors Affecting Loneliness in Older Adults: Evidence from Ardakan Cohort Study on Aging (ACSA) Understanding Knowledge and Behaviors Related To the Covid-19 Epidemic in Medical Students in Morocco Survival Prognostic Factors of Male Breast Cancer Using Appropriate Survival Analysis for Small Sample Size: Three Center Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1