继续

IF 0.4 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Alternative Investments Pub Date : 2019-07-03 DOI:10.3905/jai.2019.1.079
M. Czasonis, B. Pamir, D. Turkington
{"title":"继续","authors":"M. Czasonis, B. Pamir, D. Turkington","doi":"10.3905/jai.2019.1.079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The carry trade in foreign currencies is known for delivering positive returns, on average, and for occasionally suffering large losses. While these characteristics prevail, on average, across time and across currency pairs, the authors find that interest rate differentials on their own are not sufficient to identify conditions in which currencies reliably exhibit these return and risk attributes. They use three variables—valuation, crowding, and volatility—to identify time periods and cross-sections of currencies in which the carry trade performs best. They document a substantial difference in performance between the carry trade applied to high-volatility versus low-volatility currency pairs. In the full sample from 1984 to 2017, carry in high-volatility pairs has consisted of currencies that are undervalued, on average, experience greater swings in valuation, and have boom and bust cycles aligned with investor crowding. This finding is consistent with the notion that carry represents a risk premium. Carry in low-volatility pairs has the opposite characteristics. Though both strategies performed well prior to the 2008 financial crisis, only carry in high-volatility pairs has worked since. TOPICS: Currency, quantitative methods, analysis of individual factors/risk premia","PeriodicalId":45142,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alternative Investments","volume":"22 1","pages":"100 - 111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carry On\",\"authors\":\"M. Czasonis, B. Pamir, D. Turkington\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jai.2019.1.079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The carry trade in foreign currencies is known for delivering positive returns, on average, and for occasionally suffering large losses. While these characteristics prevail, on average, across time and across currency pairs, the authors find that interest rate differentials on their own are not sufficient to identify conditions in which currencies reliably exhibit these return and risk attributes. They use three variables—valuation, crowding, and volatility—to identify time periods and cross-sections of currencies in which the carry trade performs best. They document a substantial difference in performance between the carry trade applied to high-volatility versus low-volatility currency pairs. In the full sample from 1984 to 2017, carry in high-volatility pairs has consisted of currencies that are undervalued, on average, experience greater swings in valuation, and have boom and bust cycles aligned with investor crowding. This finding is consistent with the notion that carry represents a risk premium. Carry in low-volatility pairs has the opposite characteristics. Though both strategies performed well prior to the 2008 financial crisis, only carry in high-volatility pairs has worked since. TOPICS: Currency, quantitative methods, analysis of individual factors/risk premia\",\"PeriodicalId\":45142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Alternative Investments\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"100 - 111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Alternative Investments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jai.2019.1.079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alternative Investments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jai.2019.1.079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

外汇套息交易以平均收益为正而闻名,偶尔也会遭受巨额损失。虽然这些特征普遍存在,但平均而言,跨越时间和货币对,作者发现,利率差异本身不足以确定货币可靠地表现出这些回报和风险属性的条件。他们使用三个变量——估值、拥挤度和波动性——来确定套利交易表现最佳的时间段和货币横截面。他们记录了适用于高波动性货币对和低波动性货币对的套息交易之间的显著差异。在1984年至2017年的全部样本中,高波动性货币对的套利交易由平均被低估的货币组成,它们的估值波动更大,其繁荣和萧条周期与投资者拥挤程度一致。这一发现与利差代表风险溢价的观点是一致的。在低波动性货币对中进行套利则具有相反的特征。尽管这两种策略在2008年金融危机之前都表现良好,但自那以来,只有在高波动性货币对中进行套利交易才奏效。主题:货币,定量方法,个体因素/风险溢价分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Carry On
The carry trade in foreign currencies is known for delivering positive returns, on average, and for occasionally suffering large losses. While these characteristics prevail, on average, across time and across currency pairs, the authors find that interest rate differentials on their own are not sufficient to identify conditions in which currencies reliably exhibit these return and risk attributes. They use three variables—valuation, crowding, and volatility—to identify time periods and cross-sections of currencies in which the carry trade performs best. They document a substantial difference in performance between the carry trade applied to high-volatility versus low-volatility currency pairs. In the full sample from 1984 to 2017, carry in high-volatility pairs has consisted of currencies that are undervalued, on average, experience greater swings in valuation, and have boom and bust cycles aligned with investor crowding. This finding is consistent with the notion that carry represents a risk premium. Carry in low-volatility pairs has the opposite characteristics. Though both strategies performed well prior to the 2008 financial crisis, only carry in high-volatility pairs has worked since. TOPICS: Currency, quantitative methods, analysis of individual factors/risk premia
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alternative Investments (JAI) provides you with cutting-edge research and expert analysis on managing investments in hedge funds, private equity, distressed debt, commodities and futures, energy, funds of funds, and other nontraditional assets. JAI is the official publication of the Chartered Alternative Investment Analyst Association (CAIA®). JAI provides you with challenging ideas and practical tools to: •Profit from the growth of hedge funds and alternatives •Determine the optimal mix of traditional and alternative investments •Measure and track portfolio performance •Manage your alternative investment portfolio with proven risk management practices
期刊最新文献
Commodity Futures and Trend Inflation Inflation Hedging Potential of Infrastructure Sector and Sub-Sector Returns—Evidence from Emerging Markets Listed Real Estate in a Multi-Asset World: Does It Add Value? Too Much of A Good Thing? Drawbacks of Stressing Measurement of Impact Investing Editor’s Letter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1