新型起搏器ID算法手机应用程序用于心脏设备识别的单次试验与多次试验的准确性

K. Ferrick, Alexander Conant, Jay J Chudow, Syona S Shetty, Rahul Grover, John D Fisher, A. Krumerman
{"title":"新型起搏器ID算法手机应用程序用于心脏设备识别的单次试验与多次试验的准确性","authors":"K. Ferrick, Alexander Conant, Jay J Chudow, Syona S Shetty, Rahul Grover, John D Fisher, A. Krumerman","doi":"10.31487/j.jicoa.2022.03.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fast and accurate identification of cardiac devices can facilitate device programming and interrogation in various medical settings. We have previously demonstrated the accuracy of the PacemakerID machine learning algorithm for mobile phone cardiac device identification. However, the questions of the reproducibility of this algorithm and whether a single trial sufficiently maximizes accuracy have yet to be answered. Here, we examine 502 chest x-rays performed at a single institution on patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and permanent pacemakers. The PacemakerID mobile phone application was used for five sequential trials on each image and the accuracy of one, three, and five trials were compared. A single trial resulted in a 79% accuracy and 82% positive predictive value with no significant difference (p=0.69) as compared to five trials at identifying device manufacturers. Across all devices, the results of a single trial were not significantly different from those of five trials. Our data demonstrate that a single trial is sufficient to maximize diagnostic accuracy with the PacemakerID mobile phone application, facilitating rapid identification for prompt programming and interrogation of cardiac devices.","PeriodicalId":93027,"journal":{"name":"Journal of integrative cardiology open access","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of a Single Versus Multiple Trials of Novel Pacemaker ID Algorithm Mobile Phone App for Identification of Cardiac Devices\",\"authors\":\"K. Ferrick, Alexander Conant, Jay J Chudow, Syona S Shetty, Rahul Grover, John D Fisher, A. Krumerman\",\"doi\":\"10.31487/j.jicoa.2022.03.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fast and accurate identification of cardiac devices can facilitate device programming and interrogation in various medical settings. We have previously demonstrated the accuracy of the PacemakerID machine learning algorithm for mobile phone cardiac device identification. However, the questions of the reproducibility of this algorithm and whether a single trial sufficiently maximizes accuracy have yet to be answered. Here, we examine 502 chest x-rays performed at a single institution on patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and permanent pacemakers. The PacemakerID mobile phone application was used for five sequential trials on each image and the accuracy of one, three, and five trials were compared. A single trial resulted in a 79% accuracy and 82% positive predictive value with no significant difference (p=0.69) as compared to five trials at identifying device manufacturers. Across all devices, the results of a single trial were not significantly different from those of five trials. Our data demonstrate that a single trial is sufficient to maximize diagnostic accuracy with the PacemakerID mobile phone application, facilitating rapid identification for prompt programming and interrogation of cardiac devices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of integrative cardiology open access\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of integrative cardiology open access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.jicoa.2022.03.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of integrative cardiology open access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.jicoa.2022.03.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

快速准确地识别心脏设备可以促进各种医疗环境中的设备编程和询问。我们之前已经证明了PacemakerID机器学习算法用于手机心脏设备识别的准确性。然而,该算法的再现性以及单次试验是否足以使准确性最大化的问题还有待回答。在这里,我们检查了在一家机构对植入型心律转复除颤器和永久性起搏器的患者进行的502次胸部x光检查。PacemakerID手机应用程序在每张图像上进行了五次连续试验,并比较了一次、三次和五次试验的准确性。与确定设备制造商的五项试验相比,一项试验的准确率为79%,阳性预测值为82%,无显著差异(p=0.69)。在所有设备中,单个试验的结果与五个试验的结果没有显著差异。我们的数据表明,一次试验就足以最大限度地提高PacemakerID手机应用程序的诊断准确性,有助于快速识别心脏设备的即时编程和询问。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accuracy of a Single Versus Multiple Trials of Novel Pacemaker ID Algorithm Mobile Phone App for Identification of Cardiac Devices
Fast and accurate identification of cardiac devices can facilitate device programming and interrogation in various medical settings. We have previously demonstrated the accuracy of the PacemakerID machine learning algorithm for mobile phone cardiac device identification. However, the questions of the reproducibility of this algorithm and whether a single trial sufficiently maximizes accuracy have yet to be answered. Here, we examine 502 chest x-rays performed at a single institution on patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and permanent pacemakers. The PacemakerID mobile phone application was used for five sequential trials on each image and the accuracy of one, three, and five trials were compared. A single trial resulted in a 79% accuracy and 82% positive predictive value with no significant difference (p=0.69) as compared to five trials at identifying device manufacturers. Across all devices, the results of a single trial were not significantly different from those of five trials. Our data demonstrate that a single trial is sufficient to maximize diagnostic accuracy with the PacemakerID mobile phone application, facilitating rapid identification for prompt programming and interrogation of cardiac devices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cross-Sectional, Non-Randomized, Single-Blinded, and Single-Center Study for the Accuracy of 12 Lead Smartphone ECG in the Detection of Ventricular Arrhythmias A Single Blinded, Cross-Sectional, Single-Center Study for the Validation of Atrial Fibrillation Detection using Spandan Smartphone ECG Bridging Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy with a Wearable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Case Report of Protruded Implantable Cardiac Device through Chest in 50 Years Old Male Giant Hematoma of Rectus Abdominis Muscle in a Patient with Schistosomiasis without Periportal Abnormalities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1