K. Ferrick, Alexander Conant, Jay J Chudow, Syona S Shetty, Rahul Grover, John D Fisher, A. Krumerman
{"title":"新型起搏器ID算法手机应用程序用于心脏设备识别的单次试验与多次试验的准确性","authors":"K. Ferrick, Alexander Conant, Jay J Chudow, Syona S Shetty, Rahul Grover, John D Fisher, A. Krumerman","doi":"10.31487/j.jicoa.2022.03.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fast and accurate identification of cardiac devices can facilitate device programming and interrogation in various medical settings. We have previously demonstrated the accuracy of the PacemakerID machine learning algorithm for mobile phone cardiac device identification. However, the questions of the reproducibility of this algorithm and whether a single trial sufficiently maximizes accuracy have yet to be answered. Here, we examine 502 chest x-rays performed at a single institution on patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and permanent pacemakers. The PacemakerID mobile phone application was used for five sequential trials on each image and the accuracy of one, three, and five trials were compared. A single trial resulted in a 79% accuracy and 82% positive predictive value with no significant difference (p=0.69) as compared to five trials at identifying device manufacturers. Across all devices, the results of a single trial were not significantly different from those of five trials. Our data demonstrate that a single trial is sufficient to maximize diagnostic accuracy with the PacemakerID mobile phone application, facilitating rapid identification for prompt programming and interrogation of cardiac devices.","PeriodicalId":93027,"journal":{"name":"Journal of integrative cardiology open access","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of a Single Versus Multiple Trials of Novel Pacemaker ID Algorithm Mobile Phone App for Identification of Cardiac Devices\",\"authors\":\"K. Ferrick, Alexander Conant, Jay J Chudow, Syona S Shetty, Rahul Grover, John D Fisher, A. Krumerman\",\"doi\":\"10.31487/j.jicoa.2022.03.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fast and accurate identification of cardiac devices can facilitate device programming and interrogation in various medical settings. We have previously demonstrated the accuracy of the PacemakerID machine learning algorithm for mobile phone cardiac device identification. However, the questions of the reproducibility of this algorithm and whether a single trial sufficiently maximizes accuracy have yet to be answered. Here, we examine 502 chest x-rays performed at a single institution on patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and permanent pacemakers. The PacemakerID mobile phone application was used for five sequential trials on each image and the accuracy of one, three, and five trials were compared. A single trial resulted in a 79% accuracy and 82% positive predictive value with no significant difference (p=0.69) as compared to five trials at identifying device manufacturers. Across all devices, the results of a single trial were not significantly different from those of five trials. Our data demonstrate that a single trial is sufficient to maximize diagnostic accuracy with the PacemakerID mobile phone application, facilitating rapid identification for prompt programming and interrogation of cardiac devices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of integrative cardiology open access\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of integrative cardiology open access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.jicoa.2022.03.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of integrative cardiology open access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.jicoa.2022.03.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Accuracy of a Single Versus Multiple Trials of Novel Pacemaker ID Algorithm Mobile Phone App for Identification of Cardiac Devices
Fast and accurate identification of cardiac devices can facilitate device programming and interrogation in various medical settings. We have previously demonstrated the accuracy of the PacemakerID machine learning algorithm for mobile phone cardiac device identification. However, the questions of the reproducibility of this algorithm and whether a single trial sufficiently maximizes accuracy have yet to be answered. Here, we examine 502 chest x-rays performed at a single institution on patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and permanent pacemakers. The PacemakerID mobile phone application was used for five sequential trials on each image and the accuracy of one, three, and five trials were compared. A single trial resulted in a 79% accuracy and 82% positive predictive value with no significant difference (p=0.69) as compared to five trials at identifying device manufacturers. Across all devices, the results of a single trial were not significantly different from those of five trials. Our data demonstrate that a single trial is sufficient to maximize diagnostic accuracy with the PacemakerID mobile phone application, facilitating rapid identification for prompt programming and interrogation of cardiac devices.