2018年欧盟药品政策的五大问题

Yannis Natsis
{"title":"2018年欧盟药品政策的五大问题","authors":"Yannis Natsis","doi":"10.1177/2399202618774510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present analysis looks at the key issues which dominate the EU medicines policy agenda during 2018 namely the proposed regulation on European collaboration on Health Technology Assessment (HTA), the ongoing discussion around the role of intellectual property related incentives in biomedical R&D, the future of initiatives such as BeNeLuxA, the role of the European Medicines Agency and the reaction of the pharmaceutical companies to the unprecedented debate around access to medicines in Europe.","PeriodicalId":74158,"journal":{"name":"Medicine access @ point of care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2399202618774510","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The top 5 issues in EU medicines policy for 2018\",\"authors\":\"Yannis Natsis\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2399202618774510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present analysis looks at the key issues which dominate the EU medicines policy agenda during 2018 namely the proposed regulation on European collaboration on Health Technology Assessment (HTA), the ongoing discussion around the role of intellectual property related incentives in biomedical R&D, the future of initiatives such as BeNeLuxA, the role of the European Medicines Agency and the reaction of the pharmaceutical companies to the unprecedented debate around access to medicines in Europe.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine access @ point of care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2399202618774510\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine access @ point of care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2399202618774510\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine access @ point of care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2399202618774510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本分析着眼于2018年主导欧盟药品政策议程的关键问题,即关于欧洲卫生技术评估合作(HTA)的拟议法规,围绕知识产权相关激励措施在生物医学研发中的作用正在进行的讨论,BeNeLuxA等举措的未来,欧洲药品管理局的作用以及制药公司对欧洲前所未有的药品获取辩论的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The top 5 issues in EU medicines policy for 2018
The present analysis looks at the key issues which dominate the EU medicines policy agenda during 2018 namely the proposed regulation on European collaboration on Health Technology Assessment (HTA), the ongoing discussion around the role of intellectual property related incentives in biomedical R&D, the future of initiatives such as BeNeLuxA, the role of the European Medicines Agency and the reaction of the pharmaceutical companies to the unprecedented debate around access to medicines in Europe.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
A structural equation modeling of supply chain strategies for artemisinin-based combination therapies in Uganda. Antibiotic consumption at community pharmacies: A multicenter repeated prevalence surveillance using WHO methodology. Assessment of proton-pump inhibitor use at a tertiary teaching hospital in Nigeria. Point-of-care high-sensitivity assay on PATHFAST as the backup in the emergency room. Medicine quality in high-income countries: The obstacles to comparative prevalence studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1